The 1998 U.S. Open apparently is going to be the stalking horse for an expansion to 32 seeds at the Grand Slams and if you're as disappointed by this news as I am, you ought to drop a strongly worded note to tournament director Jay Snyder at your earliest convenience.
Something along these lines should turn the trick: "Hey, Jay. I kind of like the idea of a seed being a special player with the top 16 getting the privilege. I don't find anything special in having someone seeded No. 31 or 32. Furthermore, I'm a fan. And one of the best things about the opening rounds of the Slams is that you can get these great matchups between, say, a No. 1 seed and a No. 17 player in the world.
"WELL, YOU CAN KISS THOSE matchups goodbye under your new seeding plan. File this idea in the shredder.
"Sincerely, (your name here).''
Why is it a bad idea?
No doubt expanding the number of seeds has strong support from both the ATP Tour and the Corel WTA Tour.
If you're the No. 30 player in the world, it's great to know you won't have to play a seed until the third round at the earliest (round of 32).
If you're a top player, you'll love knowing you won't have to face some red-hot player who has just cracked the top 30. Those are just the kind of first-round matchups the top players hate. You want a challenging but not difficult time getting through that first match of a Slam.
BUT WITH THIS ISSUE, HANG the players. The game belongs to the fans and the idea of seeding 32 players cheapens the concept of the seed.
Real tennis fans can't wait for a Grand Slam draw to be pulled. That's when they start looking for early-round matchups. By seeding 32 players, you're taking away a lot of that. It's a throwback to the days when the first couple of rounds were gimmes for the top players.
The idea of seeding 32 at the Slams is past the concept stage. It's deep into the serious discussion stage. But it needs to go back into the deep freezer.
|
|
'Dunlop grapefruits' are giving Marcelo Rios headaches and elbow problems. (Allsport)
|
The problem is an inflamed tendon, which wasn't too bad when he was training in Florida in December, but got worse when he got to Australia and started hitting the heavier balls used at the Open.
He let it slide when he came back to the United States. He was hitting lighter balls that were not aggravating the injury. But the tendon also was not getting the rest it needed. He was fine winning the Lipton, using the ATP Tour balls, which are light.
But when he played Davis Cup in Argentina, he found himself hitting what he referred to as "Dunlop grapefruits." That's where the elbow really flared up.
The Unites States could host the final in December against Sweden and people in South Florida would love to have it at Crandon Park on Key Biscayne, home of the Lipton. But that's unlikely.
More likely is some indoor arena with 15,000-plus seats. Translation: New York, Boston or Philadelphia.
Charles Bricker covers tennis for The Sun-Sentinel in Fort Lauderdale
Return to the Wiseguys Corner