Appeals court denies NCAA attempt to delay Ed O'Bannon trial
Two NCAA attempts to delay or redefine the June 9 trial have been denied in the past two days. Two more NCAA motions are pending as the trial date looms.
Another obstacle to delay or redefine the Ed O’Bannon case was removed Tuesday when the 9th U.S. Circuit of Court denied the NCAA’s attempt for an emergency appeal before the scheduled June 9 trial in Oakland.
The NCAA sought to have an appeals panel rule that U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken had erred by certifying the case as a class action. The three-judge panel denied the urgent petition without comment.
“It’s one step closer to removing all obstacles to the trial starting on schedule,” said Michael Hausfeld, the lead attorney for the O’Bannon plaintiffs. “I think it’s a clear indication that the 9th Circuit wants to proceed with the trial.”
NCAA spokeswoman Stacey Osburn said the association has no comment at this time.
The NCAA has seen two appeal attempts denied in the past two days. On Monday, Wilken rejected the NCAA’s appeal that it should be allowed to argue it can’t pay football and men’s basketball players due to providing financial support to women’s and non-revenue men’s sports.
Two more motions are pending by the NCAA to delay or redefine the trial. The parties have a status conference on Thursday.
The O’Bannon plaintiffs are seeking an injunction that would prohibit the NCAA from restricting football and men’s basketball players from being compensated for use of their names, images and likenesses.
Have fun with this, SEC defenders
Making plays on the over/under for all 12 teams in the Pac-12
Mike Gundy and the Cowboys know there's one monster they have to contend with in their own...
The initiative has been put forth to offset the burden of declining freshman enrollment
How will the Big 12 shape up in 2017? Let's take a team-by-team look
Kush went 176-54-1 in 22 seasons at Arizona State