Mike Slive: Plus-one 'not necessarily in the best interests' of college football
After Larry Scott floated the possibility of reviving the plus-one Thursday, Mike Slive became the latest conference commissioner to voice his opposition to it Saturday.
Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott turned heads Thursday by saying that the post-bowl "plus-one" -- a postseason proposal supposedly discarded at the previous round of BCS meetings -- might have been revived by the new SEC-Big 12 "Champions Bowl."
But given that the plus-one would prevent those same Big 12 and SEC champions from playing for the national title against each other (a major problem if they proved to be the No. 1 and No. 2 teams at the end of the season), no one would be surprised if or when those league's commissioners came out in opposition to it. And sure enough, after the Big 12's Chuck Neinas did so when speaking to CBSSports.com Thursday, the SEC's Mike Slive followed suit Saturday.
Speaking at the SEC baseball tournament in Hoover (Ala.), Slive told the Birmingham News that a plus-one would shape the postseason "in a way that's not necessarily in the best interests of all of the conferences."
"It's interesting because clearly what we did (in introducing the "Champions Bowl") created a lot of thinking by a lot of people," Slive said. "I appreciate people thinking about that. But I think what's in the best interest of college football is a four-team playoff. I think it's better for everyone involved in the game."
Slive briefly addressed the process by which those four playoff teams would be chosen, saying a selection committee would be "difficult, but doable."
The SEC commissioner has done little in recent weeks to hide his support for the seeded four-team playoff or his unwillingness to support proposals from the Pac-12/Big Ten axis that might limit his league's postseason influence, such as on-campus semifinals, limiting the field to conference champions, or now the plus-one.
Though not addressing the "conference champions only" proposal directly, Slive did say he opposed "gerrymandering" the selection of the playoff teams.
With Slive, Neinas, and the ACC's John Swofford all on record as supporting the playoff over the plus-one -- not to mention the plus-one's previous rejection at the commissioners' last meeting -- it seems Scott may have spoken too soon. While the "Champions Bowl" may or may not prove to be the "game-changer" Scott called it, the overwhelming support for the playoff suggests that the plus-one is one game it won't change.
Keep up with the latest college football news from around the country. From the opening kick of the year all the way through the offseason, CBSSports.com has you covered with this daily newsletter. View a preview.
Ohio State is favored to win the Big Ten, but is it the best bet?
USC enters as the favorite, but are the Trojans the best bet?
Jim Harbaugh's Michigan staff will be at FAU on June 5
These five coaches will be hot names on the market after the 2017 season
The Big 12 could be wide open in 2017 ... we mean it this time
Rhule's stance on sexual violence is much-needed for a program that's been submerged in co...