Bob Stoops calls SEC's reputation 'propaganda'

By Jerry Hinnen | College Football Writer

Bob Stoops doesn't think much of the bottom half of the SEC. (USATSI)
Bob Stoops doesn't think much of the bottom half of the SEC. (USATSI)

Plenty of fans across the country have said the SEC isn't nearly as strong as its reputation -- or standing in the polls -- might suggest, seven consecutive BCS titles or not. But even if they'd agree in private, few coaches have agreed in public as strongly as Bob Stoops did in a Tuesday story in the Tulsa World.

"So they've had the best team in college football," Stoops said at a "Sooner Caravan" Sooner fan gathering. "They haven't had the whole conference. Because, again, half of 'em haven't done much at all. I'm just asking you. You tell me ...

"So you're listening to a lot of propaganda that gets fed out to you," Stoops continued. "You can look at the top two, three, four, five, six teams, and you can look at the bottom six, seven, eight, whatever they are. How well are they all doing?

"What'd we [the Big 12] have, eight of 10 teams in bowl games this year? Again, you figure it all out."

Stoops isn't wrong when he argues that the bottom rungs of the SEC haven't offered much in recent years, or even that the Big 12 has been a deeper league of late; the latter actually put nine of its 10 teams in bowl games in 2012. Meanwhile, Kentucky and Auburn both finished a miserable 0-8 in SEC play with Arkansas, Missouri and Tennessee all falling short of the postseason. All told, over the past two seasons, 38 percent of the SEC has failed to make a bowl game, compared to just 15 percent of the Big 12 -- and that's despite the Big 12 playing nine conference games to the SEC's eight.

But why should that make any difference to Stoops, really? No one -- well, no one whose opinion matters, anyway -- would argue that Kentucky is better than Oklahoma, or even that Kentucky's better than, say, Iowa State. The SEC teams against which the Sooners are judged are the ones in its top half, the ones that have played eight BCS championship games against teams from other conferences and have won all eight -- including, in both 2003 and 2008, games against none other than Stoops' own Sooners.

The one way in which one league or the other's bottom half might matter to the top teams in another is gauging which national title contender has played a more difficult schedule -- a factor that didn't seem to make much difference to pollsters choosing between Alabama and Oklahoma State in 2011, but might matter substantially more with the forthcoming playoff selection committee. But again, even if the bottom end of the Big 12 offers more of a challenge than the bottom end of the SEC, does it matter when the SEC boasts four or five legitimate national title contenders to the Big 12's two or three?

Again, Stoops can speak to that difference first-hand, since it was just January when his Sooners met Texas A&M -- the SEC West's third-place team in 2012, one that lost games to two SEC teams that didn't make the SEC title game -- and were destroyed, 41-13.

In short: is the SEC really so strong that teams like last season's train wreck of an Arkansas squad deserve the benefit of the doubt? No. Is it strong enough that Bob Stoops should probably find other targets at which to aim his "propaganda" barbs? Yes.

CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre

College Football Video

January 22, 2015
USC Recruiting Update (3:45)
January 22, 2015
Potential College Football Recruits that could flip
(5:14)
January 15, 2015
Jim Rome: Cardale Jones staying put
(2:01)
January 15, 2015
Cardale Jones to return to Ohio State
(1:02)

Latest

Most Popular

CBSSports.com Shop