powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 

Stop living in denial: Get used to Clausen as No. 1 Sports News
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | MaxPreps | Mobile | Shop  
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

Stop living in denial: Get used to Clausen as No. 1

Under the radar, flying where no Notre Dame quarterback has flown before, Jimmy Clausen is the top-rated in college football.

I know, I know. That sentence is startling in about five different places, starting with the very first words. Under the radar? The quarterback at Notre Dame? Over the years, Catholic guilt or the media machine or the pope or Beano Cook made sure the quarterback at Notre Dame had more hype than anyone. Four Notre Dame quarterbacks have won the Heisman, including Paul Hornung, the only winner from a losing team. Notre Dame was a lowly 2-8 in 1956, so what Herculean numbers did Hornung put up to win the Heisman over a field that included Johnny Majors and Jim Brown? He, um, ran for 420 yards. And he threw for 917 yards. All season. Yeesh.

Whether it was Hornung winning the Heisman or Ron Powlus being anointed (by Cook) as a multiple Heisman winner before playing his first game at Notre Dame or unimpressive Tony Rice almost winning the Heisman in 1989 or Joe Theismann changing the pronunciation of his name to rhyme with Heisman ... the quarterback at Notre Dame has been, historically speaking, the most overrated player in college football.

Key word in that last sentence: Historically.

History changes, and we've moved into a different era. The media has changed. Catholic guilt and the pope have lost their influence. So has Beano Cook. After years of getting more TV time, headlines and awards than his play deserved -- whoever he was -- the quarterback at Notre Dame no longer has the wind at his back. Now the wind is in his face, and it's a wet wind. From everyone spitting at him.

Which is why I'm sticking up for Jimmy Clausen, even if he has made some major tactical errors over the years. He's the guy who committed to Notre Dame in 2006 and was so impressed with himself that he held the commitment ceremony at the College Football Hall of Fame. Clausen showed up in a stretch Hummer limousine. Full of himself? You could say that.

Notre Dame has had a lot of great recruits over the years -- combine the words "Parade All-American" and "verbal commitment" and "Notre Dame" and watch it rain hyperbole -- but nothing like Clausen. He was showing up just as Brady Quinn was leaving for the NFL, and less than two years after Charlie Weis had descended to South Bend and gone 19-6 in his first two seasons with the Irish. Clausen was Weis' first superstar quarterback recruit.

It was the perfect storm of hype, and we pretty much rebelled against it. The media rebelled. Blogs. Radio shows. Fans. And then when the games began in 2007 and Clausen was overmatched that first season -- like most true freshman quarterbacks are overmatched that first season -- we rejoiced. Full of yourself now, Jimmy?

And then we turned the page. All of us did.

And we missed a hell of a story. Because Jimmy Clausen has become the best passer in college football.

Jimmy Clausen is completing 67.6 percent of his passes and has a passer rating of 179.25. (Getty Images)  
Jimmy Clausen is completing 67.6 percent of his passes and has a passer rating of 179.25. (Getty Images)  
Did I say "the best quarterback"? I did not. Florida's Tim Tebow can't throw like Clausen, but he can run and lead and make speeches. Texas' Colt McCoy is a smaller, sleeker Tebow. Neither is a better passer than Clausen, but you could make the argument that they're a better quarterback. Nationally, there is no argument. Last year's three Heisman finalists were Tebow, McCoy and eventual winner Sam Bradford of Oklahoma. All returned this season, and they have plenty of quarterback company jockeying for Heisman position this season: Cincinnati's Tony Pike, Kansas' Todd Reesing, Arkansas' Ryan Mallett, Miami's Jacory Harris ...

There are some fabulous quarterbacks in college football.

None of them throws the football better than the guy at Notre Dame.

This is not an easy position for me to take. All that stuff about the arrogance of Clausen and the hype of Notre Dame? That was me three years ago. Clausen stepped out of that Hummer limo in 2006 and I despised him for it. I might even have written a few words about it at the time. Did I take some glee in his early struggles? It's possible. And I wasn't the only one, believe that.

But stories change. Clausen isn't the overmatched freshman of 2007 putting up putrid numbers like a 56.3 completion percentage or a 7-to-6 ratio of touchdowns to interceptions or a 103.85 passer rating that would rank No. 102 in the country this season.

Nor is he the solid sophomore of 2008: 60.9 completion percentage, 25 touchdowns and 17 interceptions, and a 132.5 passer rating (would be 57th nationally this season).

Nope. Clausen has blossomed into an absolute stud. He is completing 67.6 percent of his passes. He averages 315 passing yards per game. He has 12 touchdowns. Just two interceptions. And his passer rating of 179.25?

It leads the country.

Clausen deserves every bit of praise normally afforded the quarterback at Notre Dame -- only, he's not getting it. And neither is Notre Dame. The Irish don't deserve a spot in the BCS title conversation, but at 4-1 with a loss only in the final seconds at Michigan, they deserve better than the No. 25 ranking in both major polls this week.

And Clausen deserves a place in the Heisman Trophy ballot. I mean, high up the ballot -- maybe on that line next to the No. 1. He has led Notre Dame to a series of close victories, and in the fourth quarter (and overtime) he has gone 29 for 45 for 396 yards and four touchdowns. No interceptions.

Clausen is on pace to throw for almost 3,800 yards, 29 touchdowns and five picks. Those are Heisman numbers, and not just because he plays at Notre Dame, where Angelo Bertelli won the Heisman over Otto Graham in 1943, and where Johnny Lujack won over Doak Walker, Bobby Layne and Chuck Bednarik in 1947, and where John Huarte won the Heisman over Dick Butkus in 1964.

Jimmy Clausen has Heisman numbers because he's the top-rated quarterback in college football. Whether you like it or not.

 
 

Talk Back
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 25, 2006

October 14, 2009 9:55 pm
would make such a bold and ridiculous statement.  Clausen is a joke. I cannot wait for him to play USC's defense and get picked 3 times.  Then you silly ND fans will face the reality that by beating the lower echelon teams in the Big 10 doesn't warrant you high marks.  Michigan is 4-2 and two weeks ago they were 4-0 and UNRANKED!!!  That means the voters of the AP saw the same ...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 22, 2006

October 14, 2009 11:45 am
I personally want to see what he can do against USC this weekend. I do agree that this article is a bit premature, but overall it is accurate, and I agree that he has developed quite nicely over his time at Notre Dame.

If he goes out, and without Floyd, shreds USC's secondary apart, it will then be aparent that he should be leading the Heisman race going into week 7.

I,
...(more)
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 21, 2009

October 13, 2009 9:10 pm
I can't remember Clausen starting a game, against a ranked team (in any poll), in which Notre Dame has won.  Correct me if I'm wrong on that point, I don't care to do the research, I will apologize if I'm wrong.  Wouldn't a QB wanting to be compared to the best in the nation need to win a few of these kind of games.  I don't really care what one's passer rating is, I would much ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 30, 2007

October 13, 2009 6:46 pm
First and foremost, I will, as always, disclose I am an ND fan, graduate, and biased.  But not Lou Holtz/Beano Cook biased.  If you read Doyel's article, he makes a solid point.  Clausen is the best passer in college football, not the best QB.  You cannot say he is the best QB because he doesn't have the winning resume of a Tebow or McCoy or Bradford.  They are in ano ...(more)
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 28, 2009

October 14, 2009 11:52 am
I watched the Detroit game this past weekend and as a fan it was hard to watch yet another team creep back in the closing seconds of the game. Our Defense has proven it can stop the run, but time after time the center of the field is wide open and we let teams just drive down the field to get back into the game. This is so hard to watch when our offense has been so successful especially with Rasha ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 15, 2009

October 13, 2009 9:12 pm
I'm not really making a comment on this column, just wanted to explain something about the 1956 Heisman Trophy voting, which Paul Hornung won.

Hornung didn't win the award for being a great QB. He won it as an all-around player. Offense AND defense AND punting AND kick returns.

In the 1956 season, he led his team offensively in passing, rushing, scoring, kickoff and punt
...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 30, 2007

October 13, 2009 6:51 pm
I can't say that I completely agree; but in the past month I have heard MORT, McShay, and Kiper all say that the best pure passing quarterbacks in college football are Clausen and Locker, in that order.  So Doyel is not that crazy in his statement, even if his sudo-balanced article is meant to get a rise out of both pro and anti-Notre Damers.  People have to seperate great college quarte ...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 11, 2009

October 13, 2009 11:58 am

Do you look over your articles after you write them?  Here's a gem of a contradiction: you start off by saying "Clausen is nation's top QB" and "Jimmy Clausen is the top quarterback in college football."  Then about half-way down you say "Did I say the best quarterback?  I did not."  YES YOU DID.  Wow Doyel.  That's bad, even for you.& ...(more)

Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 28, 2009

October 13, 2009 3:05 pm

Clausen is a very talented QB, the comebacks alone should give him more respect than he is getting right now. The part about this article I agree upon the most is that he is the best passer is college football right now. I think Sambradford had he not been hurt earlier in the season would be putting up similar numbers. Now it looks like Clausen's #1 target Floyd will be back way sooner th ...(more)

Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 3, 2009

October 13, 2009 7:50 pm
Please Hasselbeck, stay healthy the rest of the year and win this terrible division the Seahawks are in.  I don't want either Clauson or Jake Locker.  They're the same, unproven quarterback.  And they kind of look alike.  Neither is really all that impressive.  Both are potential busts.   And both are potential Seahawks.  Sigh.  I trust the Parcells for ...(more)
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 9, 2009

October 13, 2009 9:12 pm
While there are many valid points to this story, there is one major problem with the theory that Jimmy Clausen is the first underrated quarterback in Notre Dame history and that every previous quarterback was overrated.

Joe Montana. A name which is conspicuously absent from this story. Montana was not overrated, and like Clausen, he flew slightly under the radar in college. Everybody is
...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 14, 2008

October 13, 2009 4:23 pm
Doyel is spot-on in mentioning some of the QBs on the incredibly long list of Notre Dame players massively overblown and over-rated over the years just because they were on the Irish. Doyel makes the error though, in correctly noting this trend, then falling victim to it: you are over-rating Clausen the same way the other jokers were in the past.

Who has this guy dominated? Not one team
...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jul 17, 2008

October 13, 2009 3:17 pm
You know I was just having this same conversation with a buddy of mine before ND went on their bye week.  Claussen is the most efficient and precise passer in college football right now.  I am an ND fan, probably the most objective, and I really didn't care much for them over the past decade or so.  Changing coaches like underwear and pandering to their elitest almuni were great rea ...(more)
Reputation:88
Level:All-Star
Since:Aug 19, 2008

October 14, 2009 12:20 am
How many times do I have to hear "ND hasn't played anybody"?  Schedules are made years in advance and ND has no control over how the teams on their schedule appear (especially this early in the season) to others.  That being said, let's take a look at who ND has played:


Nevada (2-3) - After a tough early schedule (ND, Colorado St., and Mizzo
...(more)
Reputation:87
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 4, 2006

October 13, 2009 7:28 pm
MaizeCraze you are an idiot.  The best WR in College football broke his collarbone so that only leaves Tate and Rudolph for good players to throw to.  And as for him not facing tough teams.  ND plays a tougher schedule than half of the top 25.  The "bad" teams that you are talking about have suprised alot of people.  Teams on thier schedule include Michigan (4-2) ...(more)
 
 
 
 
Gregg Doyel
Recent Columns
 
Headlines
 
 
 
CBS Sports Store