powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 

To err is human -- and potentially lucrative for your conference Sports News
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | MaxPreps | Mobile | Shop  
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

To err is human -- and potentially lucrative for your conference

All these blatant officiating mistakes in college football? Like the potentially $17 million blown call Saturday that helped No. 3 Alabama stay undefeated against LSU? It's not a conspiracy.

But it's not an accident, either.

Coaches and conference referees see each other year after year. (Getty Images)  
Coaches and conference referees see each other year after year. (Getty Images)  
It's human frailty. That's all it is. It's outrageous, the way officials are screwing up this season -- missing some calls and inventing others, usually in favor of BCS-bound teams -- but it's understandable. To me, that's where this conversation needs to start: With an understanding that, as infuriating as these mistakes have been, they've not been made with intent.

They've been made by human beings who, consciously, understand that a crucial call can decide not just the outcome of the LSU-Alabama game, but the placement of their conference in the BCS standings. A crucial call that goes one way can lead to a BCS bowl lineup with one SEC team. But if that crucial call goes another way, the BCS bowl lineup could have two SEC teams, meaning millions of additional dollars for the conference. Those are facts every game official, on the field and in the replay booth, are consciously aware of.

And it leads to subconscious mistakes. Bad ones. The kind that you or I, if you or I were on the field or in the replay booth, probably wouldn't make. If we were in the replay booth for the LSU-Alabama game, for instance, we would have seen enough evidence that LSU cornerback Patrick Peterson definitely came down with one foot inbounds -- and might have had two feet down -- with 5:54 left and LSU trailing by six points. (Here's the video. Nice and concise.)

But that wasn't you or me in the replay booth. That was an SEC employee who wants to stay an SEC employee. And so on a judgment call, his brain tricked his eyes into seeing something only the Alabama fans among us saw. He saw a lack of conclusive evidence. Alabama kept the ball and drove for the field goal that put the game out of reach, 24-15.

The same thing happened the week before in the Big Ten. Iowa was undefeated and ranked No. 4 in the BCS standings, but Iowa was getting its butt kicked by Indiana. The officials came to the rescue in a way I've not seen before, calling every close play the Hawkeyes' way and most egregiously overturning an Indiana touchdown catch. The evidence on the replay definitely wasn't enough to overturn the call on the field, but that's what the replay official did. (And here's that video.) He overturned the call on the field. Do I think he consciously cheated Indiana? No.

But I think he subconsciously helped the Big Ten.

It's the most basic human element there is: self-protection. It happens in other areas of sports, too, like the team doctor who tells the football coach that his star player, coming off a concussion, can play in the next game. The team doctor wants to stay the team doctor, and he's not going to do that by telling the coach his best player can't play. So that factors into the decision. It's subconscious, and the doctor himself would be outraged at the idea, but I believe it's a factor. I believe that with all my heart.

More links

Miles, Saban voice support for SEC officials

Saturday: Alabama 24, LSU 15

Dodd: No masterpiece for SEC officials

Blogs

Dennis Dodd
Given the chance to lash out at the SEC, both Nick Saban and Les Miles went all cuddly Monday. Read more

Just like I believe with all my heart that game officials are helping their league's teams -- and their leagues -- stay in position for BCS consideration. But I believe it's subconscious. A game official reading this is probably furious. He's convinced that he would never, ever make a call based on a possible multimillion-dollar BCS payout for his league. And you keep telling yourself that, Mr. Official. You keep telling yourself that you're innocent of such unintended bias. But understand this:

The coaches in your league think you're guilty as hell.

Little-known fact, people, so pay attention here. The contract drawn up between schools for almost every non-conference game in college football has a clause determining which officials will call the game. When Texas plays Ohio State, for example, Texas wants a Big 12 crew. Ohio State wants a Big Ten crew.

In most cases the visiting team picks the officials, but that's not set in stone. It's negotiable, along with the payment to the visiting team. In some cases, a visiting team will sacrifice tens of thousands of dollars to be allowed to bring "its" officials.

So let me ask the question: If game officials are truly above having biases, why do coaches want it in writing that "their" officials will call the game?

More than a decade ago, coaches insisted on split crews, meaning four officials from the SEC would join three from the Pac-10 if Georgia were to play Washington. But the lack of familiarity between officials made the situation untenable, and there were other problems. After No. 1 Texas kicked a last-second field goal to tie No. 5 Oklahoma 15-15 in 1984 -- back when Texas was in the Southwest Conference, and Oklahoma was in the Big Eight -- OU coach Barry Switzer was furious about a disallowed interception that would have ended Texas' final drive. An SWC official ruled the OU defender out of bounds, leading Switzer to lament to the Associated Press, "There's a Big Eight official standing there watching him catch the ball. He's looking at the Southwest Conference guy signal him out of bounds -- and [the Big Eight guy] won't fight for us!"

Coaches expect allowances from officials. Why? Because they so often get allowances from officials. You remember that awful Oklahoma-Oregon game from 2006, when the replay official from the Pac-10 blew two late calls that helped Oregon stun the Sooners 34-33. The Pac-10 apologized. Lot of good that did Oklahoma.

And you remember two other examples from this season: An SEC crew called an excessive celebration penalty on Georgia that helped No. 4 LSU escape with its perfect record and BCS dreams intact on Oct. 3, and then that same crew invented a late personal foul against Arkansas that helped No. 1 Florida escape with a last-second victory. The SEC suspended that crew for a week, but the damage was done.

Rather, the good was done -- the SEC was one week closer to multiple BCS bids. How could that happen? Simple: Officials are human, and in related news, millions of dollars is a lot of money.

 
 

Talk Back
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 3, 2006

November 10, 2009 5:53 pm
That's not the formal name, but it's certainly looking like the correct name this season.  Adding the BCS NCG a few years ago made the problem worse.  There are now 4 at-large bids instead of 2.  Conferences know that the best way of getting 2 teams in the multi-million dollar bowls is two keep them undefeated as long a ...(more)
Reputation:76
Level:Pro
Since:Nov 22, 2008

November 11, 2009 1:56 pm
The problem with all these arguments is that you are assuming events would have been differnt if the play was called differently. If they do give LSU the ball do they score? I don't know and you can't either. If Georgia doesn't get the excessive celebration can you say for certain that they would have been able to stop LSU from marching down the field and scoring? THe point is you cannot ass ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 24, 2008

November 10, 2009 11:50 am
I actually agree with Doyle that the officials are thinking of their conferences first, and the easiest way to fix the bad officiating problem is to have the officials employed by the NCAA or a seperate governing body and not by the conferences. If the officials are employed by the Big 10, Big 12, SEC, ACC, etc. then of course they are going to make calls that better the conferences standing and t ...(more)
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 2, 2006

November 11, 2009 11:21 am
If you want to stir up controversy -- if you think you need to call attention to something ridiculous, try this --

LSU's rank in the Coaches poll. It's ridiculous.


They are the THIRD ranked two loss team in the Coaches rankings. THIRD . They've lost to the freakin' #1 and #3 tea
...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 7, 2007

November 10, 2009 5:04 pm
I completely agree. I'm not so sure the bias is unintentional, but the bias is there. There is no denying it. My friend at work just sent me a still photograph of the Peterson interception showing him holding the ball with both hands and with both feet inbounds.

The officiating is getting just stupid. I wonder if these guys are trying out to become NBA officials.
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 21, 2006

November 10, 2009 5:36 pm
The only reason they might want officials from their own conference, other than Doyel's valid point, is that those officials are more familiar with the way they play. But really, that shouldn't matter.

The solution is to either eliminate conference affiliation, or hire neutral crews for non-conference games. For instance, if Oklahoma plays Oregon, get a Mountain West crew for the game
...(more)
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 18, 2006

November 10, 2009 12:10 pm
Come on don't sugar coat it. Don't write an article that does everything but say it. The game was fixed. Anyone that thinks that big sports games don't get "helped" by the refs is out of their minds. There is no other explaination for it. These guys are not blind they are not stupid. They are paid off to "help" the team they are working for to win if possible. And calls like th ...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 22, 2007

November 10, 2009 11:42 am
I agree it is a weird season for officiating especially in the SEC...it's like the Summer of the Shark or something...I dont' know the cause or the answer, but thought you might like hear this excerpt from our local sports radio.

I live in Nashville, we have a good sports radio team George Plaster on The Zone 1045.5 last week they had the head of SEC officiating on for an interv
...(more)
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 2, 2006

November 11, 2009 10:36 am
Patrick Peterson definitely came down with one foot inbounds -- and might have had two feet down -- with 5:54 left and LSU trailing by six points. (Here's the video. Nice and concise.) You know, I looked at that video YET AGAIN and it's "nice and concise" all right.

Concisely INCONCL ...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 7, 2007

November 11, 2009 12:29 pm
Julio Jones was out of bounds and touched the ball before it was intercepted. The play was dead right there, no pick, no conspiracy
Reputation:89
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 28, 2006

November 10, 2009 12:51 pm
All BCS bowls pay pretty much the same amount, and there is no situation in which the SEC is not going to have two teams in BCS bowls.  If LSU had beaten Alabama and gone to the SEC Championship game, the Sugar Bowl would have chosen between the loser of the SEC Championship game and Alabama.
Might it help with ratings for the SEC Championship and might it help recruiting to have an unde
...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 5, 2008

November 10, 2009 11:58 am
Just do away with legue officials altogether. Referees should be hired and trained by the NCAA. That would aleviate all of the conference bias. It says a lot that schools are negotiating contracts around who officiates the games. That tells me that this "cheating" has been going on for years. How else could you explain this?
Do you agree with conference affiliation with referees?
Reputation:88
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 2, 2008

November 10, 2009 1:58 pm
... why can't people spell GREGG DOYEL's name correctly when it's posted right atop the column he just wrote!?

Is it conspiracy? Or, is it human laziness? Or, are people just generally stupid?

Perhaps the answer to this is also the answer to what's behind the refs' calls this year.
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 29, 2006

November 11, 2009 11:07 am


Jordan"?  Sorry, couldn't resist.
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 5, 2007

November 11, 2009 11:16 am
If it were not for pay per click advertising you, simply put, would be unemployed. The video is not conclusive and you know it. IT IS NOT C-O-N-C-L-U-S-I-V-E you stupid Pri*k.
 
 
 
 
Gregg Doyel
Recent Columns
 
Headlines
 
 
 
CBS Sports Store