powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 

Don't buy NFL's declaration of independent concussion specialists Sports News
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | MaxPreps | Mobile | Shop  
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

Don't buy NFL's declaration of independent concussion specialists

There are many things the NFL does well. The handling of its injured players has never been one of them.

Bodies in, bodies out: That's professional football's unofficial motto. Always has been, always will be. It's safer to work around spent nuclear fuel rods in a bikini than it is to have a long football career.

It's no coincidence that this concussion addendum comes after the House Judiciary Committee hammered Roger Goodell. (Getty Images)  
It's no coincidence that this concussion addendum comes after the House Judiciary Committee hammered Roger Goodell. (Getty Images)  
It was that way early last century when players died on the field, it was that way when they were paralyzed and it's that way now as players are slowly concussed into zombie-ism.

Even when the NFL tries to lessen the carnage -- and slowly, oh-so slowly, they have over many decades -- they somehow screw it up.

Case in point: The NFL just announced teams will soon be required by the NFL to supplement their medical staffs with an independent neurologist or neurosurgeon that will specifically monitor concussions.

"... each club is identifying local neurosurgeons or neurologists who will be available to provide an independent 'second opinion' in cases involving players who have had a concussion and been removed from a game or practice," the NFL announced. "Before these players return to practice or play, they must be evaluated and cleared by both their team doctor and the independent neurologist or neurosurgeon."

That sounds great, right? Finally, the league is looking out for concussed players.

Except there's one problem, and it has to do with the word "independent."

You see, the doctors won't really be "independent." They'll be paid by the teams.

Is the NFL trying to pull a Bill Clinton? Depends on what the meaning of "independent" is?

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello, in an e-mail to CBSSports.com, explained, "Yes, per the CBA, the teams and league pay for all player medical expenses. This is not a new concussion policy. It is expanding the use of specialists in the area of concussions so that every team can [have] a highly qualified neurologist or neurosurgeon for its players that will be approved [by] the league and the union."

I've known Aiello for 20 years and he is a truthful guy and good person, but the fact remains these specialists won't have much of an impact -- or truly look out for the players -- unless they are wholly independent. And that means unless they are paid by some other entity than the teams themselves.

The NFL shouldn't use the CBA as a shield on this issue. The CBA isn't the Magna Carta. It's a living organism that the NFL and players have occasionally circumvented before and will again.

The players should create their own pool of money for concussion and head-trauma specialists, CBA be damned.

Any time a player would suffer a head injury, he'd be required to go see this specialist, a truly independent specialist, who doesn't earn a paycheck from the NFL or its teams.

What the league has done is create something that superficially looks comprehensive but is built upon a bed of straw. A specialist paid by a franchise will have the team's and league's interest first, not the player's. Of course that's the case. Next lesson: Consuming too much tequila makes you drunk.

Some are hailing the NFL's policy shift, but that's because they still believe the specialists are independent. Nothing's really changed except who's doing the kowtowing for the NFL.

This policy addendum is really a response to the ass-whuppin' commissioner Roger Goodell received before the House Judiciary Committee last month, in which the NFL was blasted for downplaying the effects of concussions and was compared to tobacco executives. The NFL had to do something in response, and this concussion addendum was just the ticket.

"I don't want to call it forced, but it's been strongly urged because of the awareness of the issue these days," Chester Pitts, a lineman and union representative for the Houston Texans, told the New York Times. "When you have Congress talking about the antitrust exemption and them calling them the tobacco industry, that's pretty big. But it's a good thing it's transpiring."

Even some union members themselves are fooled because I don't think they truly comprehend the doctors aren't independent.

Having another medical viewpoint with a concussed player is a nice initial step, but having a non-independent specialist that's paid by the teams is like asking a hooker to evaluate your performance.

Not that I have any experience with that.

But I digress.

The Times reported that when Philadelphia Eagles running back Brian Westbrook went to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center for a third-party consultation over his second concussion in as many weeks, the group of specialists included the Steelers' team neurosurgeon as well as the league's director of neurological testing.

That had to be a bit intimidating for Westbrook. How was he supposed to have confidence that these two experts -- one who works for the NFL, the other for an NFL team -- had his best interests in mind?

The new policy might make things slightly better, but not much.

It'll mostly be concussed business as usual.

Bodies in, bodies out.

 
For more from Mike Freeman, check him out on Twitter: @realfreemancbs
 

Talk Back
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 18, 2006

November 26, 2009 11:16 am
Every player in the NFL knows the risks and are paid very well for it. They are playing a very dangerous game that at times is life threatening. They are very well aware of it and are willing to take the risk for all of the great rewards that come with it. They could make the game risk free and nobody would want to watch it would they.It is the danger and the risk that makes it what it is, makes f ...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 31, 2009

November 25, 2009 2:12 pm

Freeman, you need to have a little faith in doctors.  They take a pledge to do no harm.  They can lose their license to practice if they go against this pledge, but you are automatically assuming that a few NFL dollars will have all of these guys rushing injured players onto the field.  Even current team doctors hold players out of games when the player and coach think they can p ...(more)

Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 10, 2008

November 25, 2009 12:25 pm
If there truly was an independent doctor analysis, then Ben Roethlisberger should sit out this week.  I would say the same thing if it was Peyton Manning.  Is there any Steeler fan who truly thinks Roethlisberger should play this Sunday?  If you do, then you're part of the problem.

Also, it appears the new Riddell Revolution helmets are not the panacea everyone thoug
...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 4, 2006

November 25, 2009 5:02 pm
Your shrink should be independent, paid by a third party. I'ts obvious that the only reason he's saying you're sane enough to write for public consumption is because you're footing the bill.
 
 
 
 
Mike Freeman
Recent Columns
 
Headlines
 
 
 
CBS Sports Store
Reebok New Orleans Saints Super Bowl XLIV Champions Locker Room Hat
New Orleans Saints XLIV Super Bowl Champs
Get your Gear Shop Now