With the stunning news that the Milwaukee Bucks decided Monday not to make a qualifying offer to Charlie Villanueva came confirmation of what we already knew: This is going to be a strange free-agent signing period in the NBA, one in which conventional wisdom need not apply.
By dumping Richard Jefferson on the Spurs, the Bucks seemed to be clearing cap space to keep restricted free agents Ramon Sessions and Villanueva. But Sessions got a qualifying offer and Villanueva didn't, making him an unrestricted free agent at midnight Wednesday.
In a league that is increasingly becoming about the haves and have-nots, one team's problem is another team's savior. Fresh off their pre-draft acquisition of Shaquille O'Neal, the Cavs are looking for a versatile big man to complement the Big Cuyahoga while at the same time not clogging the floor for LeBron James. Enter Villanueva, who would appear to be an ideal piece for GM Danny Ferry's plan of making a serious championship run this season.
When the Cavs acquired Shaq, Villanueva wrote the following on his Twitter account: "Very interesting, Shaq to Cleveland, nice, all Cleveland [needs] is a PF now."
Also in that mix is Pistons unrestricted Rasheed Wallace, who could be an attractive option for Cleveland and Orlando, among others.
The problem is, the best the Cavs could offer Villanueva is the mid-level exception of about $5.5 million. Short of that, a sign-and-trade would work, but the Cavs divested themselves of their two most tradable assets -- Ben Wallace and Sasha Pavlovic -- in the Shaq trade. The Villanueva decision also has a direct impact on the Pistons, who are among the teams with the most money to spend on free agents. Joe Dumars is believed to be targeting Carlos Boozer and/or Hedo Turkoglu. But the availability of Villanueva makes his decision a lot more interesting.
UPDATE: The Bucks' thinking behind not extending a qualifying offer to Villanueva was discussed internally at least two dozen times, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The person, who is familiar with the team's strategy, said matching Villanueva's offers as a restricted free agent -- or possibly keeping him on the one-year tender for about $4.7 million -- would've rolled back the flexibility general manager John Hammond had just achieved by trading Jefferson, who was due $29.2 million over the next two seasons.
Whereas most observers -- including rival team executives -- believed the Jefferson trade opened the door for Milwaukee to re-sign both Villanueva and Sessions, there's a chance the team won't keep either one. The organization is determined to get out of the rut caused by overpaying the likes of Bobby Simmons, Charlie Bell, and Dan Gadzuric in similar situations in the past. If the offers received by Sessions on the restricted market are fair, Milwaukee will match. If not, the team is planning to hold the line on not overpaying.
Another factor with Villanueva is that, given the economy and dearth of teams with cap space to sign free agents, the organization believes it is feasible that Villanueva won't be blown away by free-agent offers and thus would have been inclined to accept the one-year offer for $4.7 million. The Bucks didn't want to be in a position of having to rescind the non-binding qualifying offer, which would've hampered Villanueva's efforts to land a free-agent deal. Having chosen to get their financial house in order and preserve the possibility of being as much as $7 million under the cap in 2010, the Bucks' hierarchy felt it was better to be up front with Villanueva and allow him unfettered access to the free-agent market. Although a sign-and-trade technically remains an option, the Bucks aren't interested in jeopardizing their roster and cap flexibility by taking on the kind of contracts that would come back in such a deal.
___
Clearing up one piece of draft business: While one of the many executives who spoke with the Nets on draft night came away convinced that the team had selected Terrence Williams for someone else with the No. 11 pick, a person with knowledge of the situation said Monday that T-Will is most likely to stay in New Jersey. On the heels of trading Vince Carter in the hours before the draft, the Nets had conversations with numerous teams involving, among other things, the No. 11 pick. Nothing came to fruition, and while the Nets are still listening, it appears that Williams is staying put for now.
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? (UPDATE)
Posted on: June 29, 2009 6:18 pm
Edited on: June 29, 2009 11:32 pm
Comments Add a Comment
|
cshep26 |
Posted on: June 30, 2009 10:48 am
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? (UPDATE)Right, and he will still get 20 min. a game, Shaq is not playing 40 min.
|
|
WMU Bronco |
Posted on: June 30, 2009 10:21 am
$$$Check out the Cavs current salary position
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/cleve land.htm How are they going to free up space to sign Villanueva? He ain't going to play for just the mid-level. You can't get rid of Z. Who would want that contract and I agree that O'Neal doesn't have 40 minutes a night in him. The odds of Villanueva ending up in Cleveland aren't good. Someone is going to give him a real contract and he is going to take it. |
|
RavenDefense |
Posted on: June 30, 2009 5:17 am
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? (UPDATE)Trading Z now is a must. He opens up cap space and could help a team. This guy is too valuable to merely pick up scrap minutes left over from Shaq. He is still a 25-30 minute guy.When was the last time you saw Shaq play man? He isn't a 35-40 minute guy anymore. He is more like a 20-25 minute MAXIMUM guy now. Meaning a quality center to rotate with him is NECESSARY. Trading away Z would be insane. They are both older guys on the downswing of their career. Neither of them can play huge minutes anymore. They play two very different styles making it more difficult for opposing big men to get into any defensive rhythm against them. Oh and the biggest reason why keeping Z is absolutely necessary... so Shaq NEVER has to be on the floor in late game free throw situations. EVER. If Cleveland trades Z, not only will it make the Shaq deal completely useless, they will be lucky to get past the 1st round of next years playoffs. Period.
|
|
devo348 |
Posted on: June 30, 2009 2:05 am
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? (UPDATE)Cracks me up but so true!
|
|
greatbenji |
Posted on: June 29, 2009 11:55 pm
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? (UPDATE)Coming from a guy who has seen Villanueva play probably more than a lot of you guys because who outside Milwaukee watches the Bucks unless they're playing their team. The guy doesn't play defense at all, he refuses to be a PF, just a tall SF that shoots 3s and jump shots. He can take his tweets to Cleveland for all I care. When a team as bad as the Bucks drafts a PG, has Luke Ridnour and still decides that they'd rather have a 3rd PG(actually 4th PG) instead of a 6'10" PF that should tell you something. I hope Cleveland offers Villanueva a huge contract. They will not win a NBA championship with this guy. This team is going to turn into the Cleveland Bucks and Lebron if you keep this up. Please do.
|
|
Jim F13 |
Posted on: June 29, 2009 11:55 pm
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? (UPDATE)I saw a lot of Charlie V in Toronto and I love his game. He was a 6'3" guard that suddenly grew into a power forward so his ballhandling skills are solid. He is a great offensive threat from 3 or inside or just picking up garbage points. His D is ok.. but most importantly he is a character guy; a team player- no complaining; just goes out and does what he is told to do.
With Shaq and Lebron the headliners, guys need to be satisfied being the supporting cast. Charlie V would be a fantastic pickup for the Cavs; a much better choice than Sheed with his T's, his up and down work ethic and his attitude. Also Charlie brings a different style to the front court- finesse to complement Shaq's power. They would contend but look out- Orlando will be better and a healthy Boston could be tough. |
|
bihawkfan |
Posted on: June 29, 2009 11:19 pm
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece?  
; This is a very interesting idea. Charlie's play actually fits with Cleveland. I'm a Cleveland fan but, You have to keep Z because I don't believe Shaq can stay in games too long during the season. You have to keep him fresh throughout the year. Not to mention, you will need the fouls during the playoffs. I really believe the Shaq signing wasn't bad but, very overblown as far impact to promised land. But back to Charlie. He can hit jumpers and rebound. He can also hit free throws. Something Shaq can't do. |
|
SMOKINGGUNS |
Posted on: June 29, 2009 11:00 pm
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece? Trading Z a mustTrading Z now is a must. He opens up cap space and could help a team. This guy is too valuable to merely pick up scrap minutes left over from Shaq. He is still a 25-30 minute guy.
|
|
Strikatuine |
Posted on: June 29, 2009 10:00 pm
Villanueva: Cavs' missing piece?If they get him they'll be real tough this year.
|




