Blog Entry

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

Posted on: May 2, 2011 4:32 pm
Edited on: May 2, 2011 6:42 pm
 
MIAMI -- Paul Pierce will not face further disciplinary action for his altercation with James Jones in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference semifinals, a league source confirmed Monday to CBSSports.com. Whether the rest of the Celtics will show up with him for Game 2 against the Heat remains to be seen.

After reviewing the incident that resulted in the first of Pierce's two technical fouls in Miami's 99-90 victory in Game 1, league officials decided Pierce's actions did not warrant a fine or suspension. Before practicing Monday at the University of Miami, Pierce said he was "definitely worried" about how the league would view the incident, but the Celtics clearly have more problems to worry about as they try to avoid falling behind 0-2 in a playoff series for the first time in the Big Three era.

"I was surprised at getting kicked out, yeah," Pierce said. "I didn’t think what I did warranted an ejection. But sometimes, players get caught in the heat of the game and sometimes the refs do, too."

Pierce and Jones received technicals after Jones wrapped Pierce up as the Celtics star pump-faked him into the air with 7:59 left Sunday. Pierce and Celtics coach Doc Rivers said Monday they believed that play, as well as a later altercation between Dwyane Wade and Pierce, should have resulted in flagrant fouls on the Heat. 

Instead, Pierce was assessed his second technical foul after Wade tried to run through him on a screen with 7:00 left. Referee Ed Malloy gave Pierce a technical, and crew chief Dan Crawford explained after the game that Pierce received it -- and the accompanying automatic ejection -- for a "verbal taunt." 

UPDATE: After reviewing the incidents Monday, NBA officials rescinded Jones' flagrant foul from the Pierce incident but charged him with a flagrant foul, penalty-one for striking Pierce around the neck. In addition, the league office downgraded Jermaine O'Neal's flagrant-one with 2:30 left in the third quarter to a personal foul. The call was devastating to the Celtics, resulting in a five-point swing when Jones made both free throws and Mike Bibby added a 3-pointer that gave the heata 72-58 lead.

While Rivers disagreed with the explanations given by Crawford after the game, he expertly turned the tables on his team Monday -- essentially taunting his players for allowing the Heat to dictate everything in Game 1, including the physical tone and an aggressive defensive posture that forced the Celtics into a timid, impatient offensive approach.

"Miami wants to show us they’re physical," Rivers said. "That’s cool with us. And we just want to play the way we play. I honestly don’t know if that’s physical or not. That’s for everyone else to say. But at the end of the day, they’re going to play their style, we’re going to play our style, and somebody’s style is going to win."

This is the fourth time the Celtics have trailed 1-0 in a playoff series during the Big Three era; they've yet to lose a Game 2. In 2009, Boston lost Game 1 of the conference semifinals to Orlando at home and lost the series in seven games. The other two instances came on the road during the 2010 playoffs: against the Cavaliers in the conference semis (Boston won the series in six games) and in the NBA Finals against the Lakers (Boston lost the series in seven).

"This is the first time we’ve been in the playoffs with this team," Rajon Rondo said. "It’s different. Obviously, the Big Three have been here. But it’s only five guys now -- myself and Baby (Glen Davis) -- and everyone else hasn’t been in a playoff series with them. So it’s a different team. But we’re confident that we can win Game 2."

How do the Celtics avoid falling behind 0-2 for the first time since Pierce teamed with Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen in 2007? Five things:

1) Listen to Rivers and be the aggressor: Rivers has such a good feel for the personality of his team, and he knows how insulted his players will be when hearing him belabor the point about how Miami dictated the physical tone in Game 1. Look for the Celtics to come out much more assertively at the start. This means A) clean but hard screens and fouls from the get-go from the Celtics, and B) the officials will have their hands full even more than in Game 1. If you thought that was physical, chippy, cheap, or whatever, just wait until Tuesday night.

2) Channel the aggression into better execution: It's not enough to be aggressive. It has to come with a plan. Rivers has needled his players in recent days by publicly stating again and again how much more athletic the Heat are, saying at one point that if this were an Olympics, Miami would win. That may be true, but this is a basketball game. Rondo has to be in attack mode, but under control and with a purpose. He also has to limit his turnovers; he had five of Boston's 13 in Game 1. The Celtics have to get into their offensive sets early, and stay with them long enough to get to the second or third option instead of letting Miami's athleticism break them down into isolation or desperation -- or worse, turnovers, which activate Miami's unstoppable transition game.

3) Find James Jones: In the film session at the team hotel Monday morning, Rivers highlighted how Jones got free for seven 3-point attempts (he made five) without being forced to take a single dribble. "That's poor defense," Rivers said.

4) Win the matchups they should win: The Celtics actually got decent production from the bench (23 points), but they need more from Rondo and Garnett -- especially when both teams' starters are on the floor. Rondo vs. Mike Bibby and Garnett vs. Chris Bosh should be clear-cut advantages for the Celtics, but Rivers admitted they got away from going into the post to Garnett too early in Game 1.

5) Hope the Heat shoot too many jumpers ... again: The Celtics actually should have been pleased with Miami's shot selection in Game 1. Especially early in the game, Miami fell in love with the jumper. According to Synergy Sports Technology, 43 of Miami's 68 field-goal attempts were jump shots. That plays right into the Celtics' hand. Unless, of course, they go in.



Comments

Since: Mar 15, 2010
Posted on: May 3, 2011 10:24 am
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

He should of got a game suspension, but David Stern will protect the integrity of play offs at the expense of the Heat and Jones.


What a idiotic statement!

Why should he be suspended? He didn't punch anyone! He didn't headbutt anyone! It was close but that wasn't a headbutt!




Since: Aug 20, 2008
Posted on: May 3, 2011 8:30 am
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

He should of got a game suspension, but David Stern will protect the integrity of play offs at the expense of the Heat and Jones.



Since: Mar 15, 2011
Posted on: May 3, 2011 2:19 am
 

lebron rules

heat win this series in 5 games---mark it down.  Lebron will not let the heat lose.  Then, after an easy win over chicago, which is overrated, Lebron will take down kobe and the lakers. 



Since: Sep 27, 2007
Posted on: May 2, 2011 11:28 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

your taking away from the true story of the game. chris bosh played horrible and still outplayed KG. do you think he is gonna have another game where he only scores 7 points. all i keep hearing is james jones won't be able to do that again. like it was luck or something. well keep leaving him open and that's whats gonna happen. bibby won't miss all them shots and neither will mario chalmers. Lebron didn't really get off and now you got wade engaged in the series. so for all you people who keep making excuses for the celtics and saying they are the better team and this and that remember miami didn't play their A game. and must I remind you that it's now two games in a row that the heat have beaten the celtics and beat them convincing in both



Since: Mar 10, 2008
Posted on: May 2, 2011 9:45 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

Check the score again.. Prior to Pierce being ejected the Celts was making a run and cut it to 7.Pierce is the Celts slasher to the hoop and took away a shooter that get Allen free.Heat has a tendancy to choke and not close out games. To say they were in control is an understatement.



Since: May 3, 2007
Posted on: May 2, 2011 8:44 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

aPul Pierce probably got off easy in not having a game suspension.  But, he better watch out now.  Don't think the refs are going to put up with his antics much longer.  I thought the Heat really looked strong in the first game.  They were much more aggressive than the Celtics and showed their athleticism advantage.  Boston is just too old to go far in these playoffs, and showed that in this game.  I look for Miami to keep the pressure on Boston, and quite simply wear them out.  Miami just has too much talent for Boston to deal with.  Now that the triad has come together, I really can't see anyone hanging with them.  They could easily go down as one of the best teams ever in the NBA.  A couple of moves needed in the off season, but I really don't think Riley will back off from that.  What a marvelous beginning for the Miami Heat.  This is going to be a lot of fun.



Since: Mar 21, 2007
Posted on: May 2, 2011 8:40 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

The Heat were up by what? 12 when Pierce got ejected?  The Heat were clearly in control the whole game, and the Celtics actually played a little better once Pierce left.  This call did not affect the outcome of the game!  



Since: May 25, 2007
Posted on: May 2, 2011 8:29 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

Glad Paul Pierce is cleared to go in this series with the Heat.  I don't even want to get in to whether the refs were right or not.  What difference does it make.  My opinion certainly won't change anything they do.  I don't think their actions affected the outcome of the first game of this series, the Heat won it fair and square.  I'm looking for the Celtics to have much greater focus and effort in game 2, and the remainder of the series.  I thought they were very much in slow motion in game 1.  I think they get game 2 and really put the Heat in a bind.  Boston is just a much more complete team than the Heat, and we really didn't see that in game 1.  And I agree with others here that having the week off really hurt the Celtics in game 1.  Doubt we'll see that again in this series.  Should be a real good one for us to watch.



Since: Dec 7, 2006
Posted on: May 2, 2011 8:20 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

So answer me this:
Paul Pierce was given a technical foul and ejection for the play with Dwayne Wade...however, wasn't the actual foul on Wade?  The way I hear everyone talking, it sounds like Paul Pierce was wrong for setting the screen.  It looked legit and fair????  Wasn't Doc Rivers correct when he said Dwayne Wade should have been given a flagrant foul, for trying to run through a screen...with his shoulder lowered???

Go Celtics!!



Since: Mar 6, 2011
Posted on: May 2, 2011 8:12 pm
 

Pierce OK for Game 2; will Celts respond?

How diplomatic, "sometimes the refs do to", in other words I think the refs lost complete control over the emotions of that game but if I come out and say that I'll get fined. Don't want the Celtics to go down 2-0 but remember they only have to win 1 in Miami as long as they win 4 games I'll be happy



The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com