Blog Entry

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Posted on: February 28, 2012 2:17 pm
By C. Trent Rosecrans

Last week Ryan Braun held a press conference to tell his side of his positive test, casting doubt and innuendo on the collector of his sample. He didn't name Dino Laurenzi Jr., but his name came out anyway shortly after Braun's press conference.

On Tuesday, Laurenzi released a statement:
On February 24th, Ryan Braun stated during his press conference that "there were a lot of things that we learned about the collector, about the collection process, about the way that the entire thing worked that made us very concerned and very suspicious about what could have actually happened." Shortly thereafter, someone who had intimate knowledge of the facts of this case released my name to the media. I am issuing this statement to set the record straight.

I am a 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin and have received Master Degrees from the University of North Carolina and Loyola University of Chicago. My full-time job is the director of rehabilitation services at a health care facility. In the past, I have worked as a teacher and an athletic trainer, including performing volunteer work with Olympic athletes. I am a member of both the National Athletic Trainers' Association and the Wisconsin Athletic Trainers' Association.  
I have been a drug collector for Comprehensive Drug Testing since 2005 and have been performing collections for Major League Baseball's Joint Drug Prevention and Treatment Program since that time. I have performed over 600 collections for MLB and also have performed collections for other professional sports leagues. I have performed post-season collections for MLB in four separate seasons involving five different clubs.  
On October 1, 2011, I collected samples from Mr. Braun and two other players. The CDT collection team for that day, in addition to me, included three chaperones and a CDT coordinator.  One of the chaperones was my son, Anthony. Chaperones do not have any role in the actual collection process, but rather escort the player to the collection area.   
I followed the same procedure in collecting Mr. Braun's sample as I did in the hundreds of other samples I collected under the Program. I sealed the bottles containing Mr. Braun's A and B samples with specially-numbered, tamper-resistant seals, and Mr. Braun signed a form certifying, among other things, that the specimens were capped and sealed in his presence and that the specimen identification numbers on the top of the form matched those on the seals.  

I placed the two bottles containing Mr. Braun's samples in a plastic bag and sealed the bag. I then placed the sealed bag in a standard cardboard Specimen Box which I also sealed with a tamper-resistant, correspondingly-numbered seal placed over the box opening. I then placed Mr. Braun's Specimen Box, and the Specimen Boxes containing the samples of the two other players, in a Federal Express Clinic Pack. None of the sealed Specimen Boxes identified the players. I completed my collections at Miller Park at approximately 5:00 p.m. Given the lateness of the hour that I completed my collections, there was no FedEx office located within 50 miles of Miller Park that would ship packages that day or Sunday.

Therefore, the earliest that the specimens could be shipped was Monday, October 3. In that circumstance, CDT has instructed collectors since I began in 2005 that they should safeguard the samples in their homes until FedEx is able to immediately ship the sample to the laboratory, rather than having the samples sit for one day or more at a local FedEx office. The protocol has been in place since 2005 when I started with CDT and there have been other occasions when I have had to store samples in my home for at least one day, all without incident.  

The FedEx Clinic Pack containing Mr. Braun's samples never left my custody. Consistent with CDT's instructions, I brought the FedEx Clinic Pack containing the samples to my home. Immediately upon arriving home, I placed the FedEx Clinic Pack in a Rubbermaid container in my office which is located in my basement.   My basement office is sufficiently cool to store urine samples. No one other than my wife was in my home during the period in which the samples were stored. The sealed Specimen Boxes were not removed from the FedEx Clinic Pack during the entire period in which they were in my home. On Monday, October 3, I delivered the FedEx Clinic Pack containing Mr. Braun's Specimen Box to a FedEx office for delivery to the laboratory on Tuesday, October 4. At no point did I tamper in any way with the samples. It is my understanding that the samples were received at the laboratory with all tamper-resistant seals intact. 
This situation has caused great emotional distress for me and my family. I have worked hard my entire life, have performed my job duties with integrity and professionalism, and have done so with respect to this matter and all other collections in which I have participated. Neither I nor members of my family will make any further public comments on this matter. I request that members of the media, and baseball fans, whatever their views on this matter, respect our privacy. And I would like to sincerely thank my family and friends for their overwhelming support through this difficult time. Any future inquiries should be directed to my attorney Boyd Johnson of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
For more baseball news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnBaseball on Twitter, subscribe to the RSS feed and "like" us on Facebook.


Since: Jun 12, 2007
Posted on: February 28, 2012 10:08 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

i don't know about you, but I smell a lawsuit coming. If you do not believe me ask Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

Since: Sep 6, 2008
Posted on: February 28, 2012 10:08 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

You can send FedEx packages over ways if there is no office around. For it to sit on your house over the weekend isn't needed. My business sends through FedEx during weekends all the time.

Since: Jan 30, 2011
Posted on: February 28, 2012 10:08 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

The arbitrator said it was overturned because of a technicality. He stated this when explaining his vote. There was absolute no indication of tampering at all other than Braun insuing the collector tampered with the sample without having any proof whatsoever to back that up other than lying to try to cover his hind end. The total question and result of the decision was if protocol was followed in this case. Evidentally, according to this guy it is not against protocol to keep a sealed sample in his home over the weekend. These guys are trained to handle these samples. Who has more of a motive to lie? Braun or the collector? There was also nothing in the appeal process before, during, or at the point of the arbitrator's decision that questioned if the samples were tampered with.

Since: May 7, 2007
Posted on: February 28, 2012 10:07 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Come on people---you think Braun or the "Pee Juggler" are going to say, "Oh yeah I messed up and I am guilty of being a fool"???  We'll never know what actually happened at either end of the game.

Since: Feb 8, 2009
Posted on: February 28, 2012 9:55 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

mmac30 his bad judgement let Braun get off. And he has nothing to gain but it puts doubt in peoples mind. You arent guily if there is reasonable doubt!

Since: Dec 24, 2011
Posted on: February 28, 2012 9:51 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Ryan "Barry" Braun is a cheat and now a liar was well. He cheated at baseball, got caught, now is willing to lie about it even if it taints an innocent man's reputation. Real classy there Mr. Braun. You are now a member of my Hall of Shame, with your bust sitting right next to Barry Bonds.

Since: Apr 20, 2009
Posted on: February 28, 2012 9:48 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Where are Heyman and Knobler now?

Sports writers covering for Braun does nothing but highlight the reason why Braun was "given" the MVP over the more deserving Kemp by the biased votes of these writers.

They should all be ashamed of themselves.   

Since: Oct 20, 2006
Posted on: February 28, 2012 9:42 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

he beat a system that has been waiting on a BIG fail and it happend to be on the latest MVP , little funny if you ask me

Since: Feb 25, 2012
Posted on: February 28, 2012 9:42 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

I agree that feds will get involved and I am sure the ESPN Lawyers are getting their ducks in line all of this is a smoke screen. The man tested positive to numbers never seen before. So please quit trying to divert the focus to where it belongs. To a man that cheated then is not even man enough to admit he made a mistake and was caught, Sorry but I have yet to hear him explain why his results were so high. He has been coached y the best lawyers in the country. The best defense is an offense and to lay the blame on others and AVOID accountability. As a good SCUBA friend of mine who is a Jew puts it “He is disgracing his people by not manning up and again painting my people in a negative light”. This from the lips of a Jew.

Since: Sep 22, 2006
Posted on: February 28, 2012 9:39 pm

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Jbone is he crooked orvdisbhe make a mistake in judgement? Whatbdisbhe have to gain?

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or