Blog Entry

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Posted on: February 28, 2012 2:17 pm
 
By C. Trent Rosecrans

Last week Ryan Braun held a press conference to tell his side of his positive test, casting doubt and innuendo on the collector of his sample. He didn't name Dino Laurenzi Jr., but his name came out anyway shortly after Braun's press conference.

On Tuesday, Laurenzi released a statement:
On February 24th, Ryan Braun stated during his press conference that "there were a lot of things that we learned about the collector, about the collection process, about the way that the entire thing worked that made us very concerned and very suspicious about what could have actually happened." Shortly thereafter, someone who had intimate knowledge of the facts of this case released my name to the media. I am issuing this statement to set the record straight.

I am a 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin and have received Master Degrees from the University of North Carolina and Loyola University of Chicago. My full-time job is the director of rehabilitation services at a health care facility. In the past, I have worked as a teacher and an athletic trainer, including performing volunteer work with Olympic athletes. I am a member of both the National Athletic Trainers' Association and the Wisconsin Athletic Trainers' Association.  
   
I have been a drug collector for Comprehensive Drug Testing since 2005 and have been performing collections for Major League Baseball's Joint Drug Prevention and Treatment Program since that time. I have performed over 600 collections for MLB and also have performed collections for other professional sports leagues. I have performed post-season collections for MLB in four separate seasons involving five different clubs.  
   
On October 1, 2011, I collected samples from Mr. Braun and two other players. The CDT collection team for that day, in addition to me, included three chaperones and a CDT coordinator.  One of the chaperones was my son, Anthony. Chaperones do not have any role in the actual collection process, but rather escort the player to the collection area.   
   
I followed the same procedure in collecting Mr. Braun's sample as I did in the hundreds of other samples I collected under the Program. I sealed the bottles containing Mr. Braun's A and B samples with specially-numbered, tamper-resistant seals, and Mr. Braun signed a form certifying, among other things, that the specimens were capped and sealed in his presence and that the specimen identification numbers on the top of the form matched those on the seals.  

I placed the two bottles containing Mr. Braun's samples in a plastic bag and sealed the bag. I then placed the sealed bag in a standard cardboard Specimen Box which I also sealed with a tamper-resistant, correspondingly-numbered seal placed over the box opening. I then placed Mr. Braun's Specimen Box, and the Specimen Boxes containing the samples of the two other players, in a Federal Express Clinic Pack. None of the sealed Specimen Boxes identified the players. I completed my collections at Miller Park at approximately 5:00 p.m. Given the lateness of the hour that I completed my collections, there was no FedEx office located within 50 miles of Miller Park that would ship packages that day or Sunday.

Therefore, the earliest that the specimens could be shipped was Monday, October 3. In that circumstance, CDT has instructed collectors since I began in 2005 that they should safeguard the samples in their homes until FedEx is able to immediately ship the sample to the laboratory, rather than having the samples sit for one day or more at a local FedEx office. The protocol has been in place since 2005 when I started with CDT and there have been other occasions when I have had to store samples in my home for at least one day, all without incident.  

The FedEx Clinic Pack containing Mr. Braun's samples never left my custody. Consistent with CDT's instructions, I brought the FedEx Clinic Pack containing the samples to my home. Immediately upon arriving home, I placed the FedEx Clinic Pack in a Rubbermaid container in my office which is located in my basement.   My basement office is sufficiently cool to store urine samples. No one other than my wife was in my home during the period in which the samples were stored. The sealed Specimen Boxes were not removed from the FedEx Clinic Pack during the entire period in which they were in my home. On Monday, October 3, I delivered the FedEx Clinic Pack containing Mr. Braun's Specimen Box to a FedEx office for delivery to the laboratory on Tuesday, October 4. At no point did I tamper in any way with the samples. It is my understanding that the samples were received at the laboratory with all tamper-resistant seals intact. 
   
This situation has caused great emotional distress for me and my family. I have worked hard my entire life, have performed my job duties with integrity and professionalism, and have done so with respect to this matter and all other collections in which I have participated. Neither I nor members of my family will make any further public comments on this matter. I request that members of the media, and baseball fans, whatever their views on this matter, respect our privacy. And I would like to sincerely thank my family and friends for their overwhelming support through this difficult time. Any future inquiries should be directed to my attorney Boyd Johnson of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
For more baseball news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnBaseball on Twitter, subscribe to the RSS feed and "like" us on Facebook.


Comments

Since: Jul 2, 2009
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:53 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

The players are tested because they lie.  I guarantee you Braun has told a lie before and I guarantee you he'll lie again.  Why is it so hard to believe that a guy with millions of dollars at stake would lie in this case?  There was no tampering.  His only logical arguement would be that somehow the sample got switched at the lab.  Overturning the ruling is one of the lamest things I have seen to date. He deserves our scorn.



Since: Dec 19, 2006
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:35 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

evrthinsbigintx, are yeah dumb?  Do it on weekday where the game starts at 1:00.  Not rocket science genius!



Since: Jul 11, 2010
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:32 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

I agree 100%. free on a technicality, but as guilty as all other cheaters.




Since: Feb 23, 2012
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:31 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Your just ignorant if you still don't believe braun is innocent, yea this guy may not have tampered with it but there was much more evidence that supported Braun. Cough Herpes Cough



Since: Jul 11, 2010
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:29 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Forget clearing your name. You're lucky you didn't lose any time or salary. That tester did nothing to your sample, but it's a shame what you are attempting to do to his reputation. From the break Braun never refuted the results, but was under legal advisement the entire time. It could have been alot worse and if you don't leave it alone it still could be. Admit it, leave it and move on from it.




Since: Mar 8, 2007
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:21 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

I always believed there was no tampering to the sample. I also believe Braun got away with it.



Since: Apr 25, 2008
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:19 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

yeah throwing this guy under the bus was trash.  i didnt even care that much until i heard him on TV running his mouth. 



Since: Dec 1, 2008
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:10 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

Whether Braun is right or wrong, he was classless in his accusation that this guy tampered with the sample.  He should have simply accepted the fact that he won and kept his mouth shut.



Since: Aug 18, 2006
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:09 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

This explanation may indicate why MLB stood behind their testing process.



Since: Aug 18, 2006
Posted on: February 29, 2012 9:07 am
 

Braun's sample collector denies tampering

I give respect to this guy for coming out to the public and giving a statement instead of hiding behind an attorney like a lot of people do.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com