Blog Entry

Funny how time can work

Posted on: December 20, 2010 4:17 pm
 

Posted by Andy Benoit

There were two unique clock-related issues that probably went unnoticed in early games Sunday. One was pointed out by Tom Kowalski on MLive.com. Kowalski explained that Lions defensive tackle Corey Williams’ costly offside penalty on third-and-one in the closing minutes with the Bucs in field goal range and the game tied actually, in the end, helped Detroit:
C.Williams (US Presswire)
Williams gave the Bucs an easy first down and the Lions were forced to use all three of their timeouts while Tampa Bay ran the ball on all three downs. The Bucs kicked the potential game-winning field goal with 1:39 left in the game.

The Lions came back and tied the game on a 28-yard field goal as time expired, but consider this: If Williams had not jumped offside -- and the Bucs had converted a first down on third-and-1 -- the Lions would've had about 40 fewer seconds to try to tie the game.

After getting the first down, the Bucs would have let the clock run and, after their next three plays, the Lions would've had to let the entire play clock run because they wouldn't have enough timeouts. Because Williams committed the infraction after the official two-minute timeout, no time came off the clock.

The other clock-issue is far more subtle. With 0:12 remaining in the game and facing fourth-and-one at the New Orleans nine-yard-line, John Harbaugh elected to kick a field goal and extend Baltimore’s lead from three to six. The Saints, at this point were out of timeouts.

But think about this for a second: what does Harbaugh gain by extending a three-point lead to six? All he ensures is that New Orleans can’t kick a field goal to tie. But with such little time remaining – nine seconds after the field goal was kicked – and no timeouts for the Saints, there’s virtually no way New Orleans would have been able to attempt a field goal. Drew Brees would have to complete about a 55-yard throw to a receiver who would have to then get out of bounds…all in seven seconds or less (and likely five seconds or less).

The Ravens would have been better off snapping the ball to Joe Flacco and having him stand there for as long as possible before taking a knee and turning it over on downs. That would have left New Orleans with six or seven seconds and 90 yards to go.

Instead, the Ravens had to kickoff to Reggie Bush, and the Saints had more space in which to create a miraculous last play. They weren’t able to capitalize, of course, but that doesn’t factor in to the logistic of Harbaugh’s decision.

Harbaugh’s decision wasn’t wrong, per se. You could maybe even argue that he made the right call (it’s not completely black or white). But at the end of the day, a three-point lead is essentially the same as a six-point lead. So why risk having to cover a kickoff when you could force the Saints to try to go 90 yards on one play?

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed

Comments

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 12, 2012 1:49 pm
 

Funny how time can work

That it was 100 % quick and easy that would steer and so it has been straight foward to buy the fact that essentials Need be. Perfect layout and consequently neat articles or reviews along with other blogposts as well as NFL Womens Jerseys other subject matter!



dsfjwerw
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 6, 2012 12:32 pm
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: May 5, 2008
Posted on: December 21, 2010 10:53 am
 

Funny how time can work

R8R- which obviously is Raider fan

stick to your LOSING team mentality

+++

as a coach I was questioning the FG myself

1- FG's can be blocked and returned for TD's, happens a lot
2- 6 point lead is 1 TD from losing, Reggie Bush is BEST in open space.  I have seen many KO's returned for TD's and a team can lateral as many times as needed.  The Saints could have put 11 skill players on the field and enhanced the effort many times over
3- let's say the qb gets the ball, runs off a few seconds and leaves the Saints 85 yards from scoring.  Rush 3 drop 8 guys in coverage and minimalize any gain.  But even 1 short completion is not FG range.  And any short pass would likely run the clock out with any forward yardage attempt.

+++

BUT maybe more importantly

the Saints were going for "steals" all day and NEVER made any clean tackles.  I would have run the ball over and over and over to kill the clock.   



Since: Sep 22, 2009
Posted on: December 20, 2010 11:06 pm
 

Funny how time can work

I think he made the point, and rightly so, that down by 3 or 6 the Saints would have to go for the TD either way as there likely wouldn't be enough time to get in position and kick the ball with no timeouts. Either way it was down to one play and the Saints would be going for the TD. His point is that it would be better to run off the clock and make the Saints get there on a single offensive play, which I imagine he believes is much less of a wildcard than letting Reggie try to run one back. I think he's got a valid point, but either way it's moot since it worked out in favor of Baltimore.



Since: Sep 1, 2006
Posted on: December 20, 2010 11:03 pm
 

Funny how time can work

If you read his blog, he explains why a six point lead is no different than a three point lead pretty well and HE is correct.  That was a pretty bad comment for a guy with a 99 reputation.



Since: Feb 7, 2008
Posted on: December 20, 2010 7:18 pm
 

Funny how time can work

Ummm, no... A six point lead means that the Saints HAD to go for a touchdown, which completely changes strategy and eliminates a lot of offensive play-calling options. There's a reason why you blog and Harbaugh coaches.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com