Blog Entry

NBA Pop Quiz: What can Shaq contribute?

Posted on: August 30, 2010 2:24 pm
Edited on: August 30, 2010 8:08 pm
 
Posted by Matt Moore

Fall is here, hear the yell, back to school, ring the bell ... The NBA season is right around the corner, and NBA training camp starts in just a few short weeks. To get you ready for the NBA season, we've put together 25 pop quizzes. Pencils ready? We continue our Pop Quizzes with this question..

What can Shaq contribute to the Celtics?

We're going to make it through the rest of this entire blog post without using a single nickname. We're going to do it. It's going to be hard, but I believe if we stick together, we can make this happen. If you're ready, we'll begin.

Shaquille O'Neal is ten years past his prime. I'm not exaggerating, either. That's not a figure of speech. His prime was literally the 1999-2000 season, meaning he's coming up on the anniversary of the season after his prime. In '99-'00 he averaged 29.7 points per game, 13.6 rebounds per game, with 3.8 assists and 3.0 blocks while averaging 40 minutes a game. He shot 57.4% from the field. He had a 30.6 PER that season, good for 6th among centers playing at least 30 minutes per game, all-time. O'Neal will never be considered in the same hallowed breath as Wilt Chamberlain, but it's close, and that season he was.

He really was the most dominant player in the NBA. But as I said, that was over ten years ago. What did O'Neal contribute last year? First, it's important not to look at it from a per-game standpoint. His position with the Celtics isn't based on what he can give them game to game, it's based on what he can give them minute to minute. And his per-minute numbers were great. If we project 20 minutes for O'Neal while Kendrick Perkins recovers from knee surgery, splitting time with Jermaine O'Neal, and we look at how he did with those minutes last season we get the following: 10.3 points per 20 minutes, 5.7 rebounds with 1 block. That's a pretty good night for a guy his age. 10 points, 6 boards, with a block. That's what you want out of a part-time veteran center. Consider Zydrunas Ilgauskas, three years younger than O'Neal and a part-time center for the Miami Triad, who averaged only 7.1 and 5.2 rebounds last season for the same Cavs team per 20 minutes.

The biggest concern is that with O'Neal's size, he should be able to produce higher rebounding numbers. And for the Celtics, he'll have to. The Celtics were a paltry 13th in Defensive Rebounding Rate (percentage of all defensive rebounds available that were snagged) last season, and with Perkins down and Kevin Garnett another year older, they'll need even more from O'Neal in that area. His size should give him the ability to contribute more in the rebounds area and less in the points section. But that means sacrifice, which leads us to the biggest question mark about what O'Neal brings to the Celtics.

O'Neal has said absolutely everything you'd want to hear from him this summer. He talks about knowing his role, about not getting caught up in ego, and buying into the whole Celtics mythos built around team play and sacrifice. Execution is the tough part. It won't be difficult in the beginning, when everyone's settling in. But if O'Neal is playing well, scoring points but not collecting rebounds, and the team struggles in the win-loss column beneath their reasonably high expectations, O'Neal is more likely to start grumbling about getting the ball more. After all, if he's scoring, that's a good thing, right? But the issue is that O'Neal can't be considered the go-to, simply because he can't put in 30 to 40 minutes a night. The rest of the offense needs to stay in sync and not be bogged down trying to facilitate the guy playing 15 to 20. The Celtics have scorers. They need to maintain their defense and improve their rebounding, and they need to do it within both the tactical and emotional parameters they've already developed.

But unlike other emotionally volatile players the Celtics could have turned to, O'Neal does have one good aspect of his very large personality. He's a known quantity. Even if he doesn't follow through with the humble subjugation of his game for the good of the contender, you know what you're getting with O'Neal. He's going to miss a certain amount of games, he's going to look like dynamite for several games, and he's going to bring the attitude the Celtics want. They need to be arrogant, confident; the team that knows that it's a step above the teams in front of them. They thrive on that attitude, it helps fuel their game. And that's why in the end, signing Shaquille O'Neal wasn't that much of a risk. He's at once an antithesis and just what the doctor ordered. Now they just have to see how medicine goes down.

For more on the Big Shamrock (dang it!), follow us on Twitter @CBSSportsNBA


Comments
xinxin
Since: Sep 25, 2010
Posted on: September 25, 2010 8:57 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Nov 14, 2006
Posted on: September 22, 2010 12:47 pm
 

NBA Pop Quiz: What can Shaq contribute?

This is a good move for the Celtics with minimal risk.  They need a guy who can handle the size that the elite teams bring.  Shaq is the guy.  No he can't dominate a game offensively like he used to, nor is he as mobile and agile as he used to be, but he has enough weapons to possibly put the Celtics back in contention for a championship even playing only 20-25 minutes a game.  As always, time will tell, but seeing Shaq in Green will look kind of funny.



Since: Aug 14, 2006
Posted on: September 21, 2010 8:51 am
 

NBA Pop Quiz: What can Shaq contribute?

The main reason Ainge and Rivers got Shaq was not to battle D12 during the regular season. He was signed to handle Bynum when they meet the Lakers in the finals. lets go to the video and you will see that D12 lacked the bulk and length to handle Bynum and Perkins lacked the length and the guy was injured. All the Lakers did was put the ball up on the rim then go get it. Remember people Bynum neber faced any foul problems during the playoffs which is an indication of his dominance. This you don't notice how he controls the paint because of the presence of Kobe and Gasol in the spotlight. So little attention to the regular season because the Celtics are only paying Shaq for the playoffs.



Since: Aug 6, 2010
Posted on: August 31, 2010 8:33 pm
 

NBA Pop Quiz: What can Shaq contribute?

Shaq will be just fine.  Boston knows that he is not the same Shaq as he was 10 years ago, not even five years ago.  But if he can give them a good 20-25 minutes of hard playing ball, the celtics will be playing for the title again.  Ray and Paul is back.  Garnett got better every game after his injury. We are looking at a very experience team.  I think Boston is a team you need to be worried about....



Since: Dec 2, 2008
Posted on: August 31, 2010 7:07 pm
 

NBA Pop Quiz: What can Shaq contribute?

Well let's see.  The Celtics handled Dwight Howard last year by being really physical with him and by the time Dwight fought back it was too late.  Adding more beef to the lineup says to me there will be more of the same.  It's also not too shabby to think, "Who on the Heat can stop Shaq?"  The guy is old, but the Heat aren't that big and they've got three of the league's biggest names at center to compete with, Shaq, Dwight Howard, and Amare Stoudemire (Obviously Stoudemire won't be a factor until he gets a better lineup around him).  I agree that there is hardly a risk in bringing Shaq in.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com