Blog Entry

Roundtable: Carmelo Anthony to the L.A. Lakers?

Posted on: February 8, 2011 5:51 pm
Edited on: February 8, 2011 6:22 pm
The's Eye On Basketball team got together to debate the merits of a potential trade between the Denver Nuggets and Los Angelescarmelo-anthony-lakers Lakers that would swap Carmelo Anthony and Andrew Bynum. Posted by Ben Golliver.

This morning, we noted a report that the Denver Nuggets and Los Angeles Lakers were discussing a possible swap of forward Carmelo Anthony and big man Andrew Bynum. Good idea? Bad idea? Other? We thought we'd talk it out. 

Matt Moore: So apparently there's some interest from L.A. Am I the only one who thinks this is madness? You just won back-to-back titles! You have the deepest, most talented roster in the NBA, and that includes Miami's Triad and Boston with umpteen bajillion HOFers (when factoring age). I just can't fathom why you would disrupt what is your biggest strength, your size and length, in order to add a high-usage star who may wind up busting your chemistry and who doesn't help you match up against Boston any better. To me, this is some desperation tinkering. I've never been a big Bynum guy, not since Tex Winter questioned his work ethic. But the facts remain. Big, study, super-tall dude who dunks and gets offensive rebounds. It's pretty simple: tall guys are good at basketball. Sure, Melo's a star, and a wiz offensively, but is that what's going to deliver L.A. the three-peat? 

For Melo, though, I feel like this is a dream. New York's home, sure, and it's the market he wants. But no one turns down a chance to play for L.A. (well, besides Raja Bell, who's awesome for not needing that kind of glamor). This gives him all the attention he wants, he knows L.A. will constantly work to build a championship around him after Kobe retires, he gets to play with his friend Bryant for the best coach of our time, and the weather's nice! This is like pouting about how you don't like your toys and your parents buying you Disney Land. 

Royce Young: Is this the trade crap Mitch Kupchak was hinting at last week? Trading for Carmelo Anthony? 

I guess if you want to catch the attention of your team, talking about landing the biggest fish in the pond is a good way to do it. 

But like you said, Matt, why does this make sense for the Lakers? They've never been about the long-term. It's a season by season thing for them. They always have money, they always have the Hollywood draw, so they're always going to be able to get players. In terms of winning a title THIS YEAR, I don't see how Carmelo improves them for that. 

The Lakers won the title last season because they had Andrew Bynum, and an Andrew Bynum that wasn't 100 percent. He's a difference maker on that team. If this is a move to try and find Kobe Bryant's heir apparent, that makes some sense, but Melo wouldn't be accepting that role for another three or four years. By that time, he'd be up for another extension. Short-term, it doesn't make sense for them to do, which is what the Lakers are all about. 

Ben Golliver: I tend to agree. Given the relative age of the Los Angeles Lakers' key pieces and their salary cap situation, this is clearly a win-now team, even more so than usual. For all the panicking of late, the Lakers are still one of the top two or three favorites to win the title. The risk in trading Andrew Bynum for Carmelo Anthony, first and foremost, is one of timing rather than production. Bynum has been injured this season and in past seasons, so the Lakers are used to making due without him. They'd vastly prefer to have him available, especially against the Celtics in the Finals, but a Pau Gasol / Lamar Odom frontline is more than capable. A Bynum trade would be felt more deeply further down the road, as the rest of the Lakers continue to age and more is required of their talented, young big man.

But, for now, the biggest issue would be: Could Anthony and Kobe Bryant figure out a way to play off each other and get enough shots/touches to make things work this spring? Would they be able to do so without compromising what Gasol gives L.A. inside? Anthony's introduction into the offense would turn LA's usage rates upside down, and his strength in isolation situations might take some adjustment time to integrate into the rest of the triangle offense. 

This would be an even more complicated version of the LeBron James / Dwyane Wade dynamic, as neither Bryant not Anthony is a natural born play-maker, and L.A. isn't likely to default to heavy pick and roll usage like Miami has this season. There would be no training camp and preseason to iron these things out. This would be wholesale change, on the fly, in the middle of a playoff chase that L.A. is already leading. Even given Anthony's age and his ability to take over the alpha dog role from Bryant as Bryant continues to age, the issue of timing -- and how it compromises this year's title run -- would give me serious pause if I'm L.A. We saw how Miami struggled out of the gates this fall. If you're Phil Jackson or Lakers management, do you really want to start that struggling, get-to-know-you process in March? 

Matt Moore: Great point, Ben. Chemistry adjustments are always difficult, and that's before bringing Kobe Bryant into the picture. This team needs to be really careful about things because there have already been flare ups in the team. This isn't a close, bonded team, it's one that walks on thin ice around Phil and Kobe. And you're bringing in a guy who hasn't had the coolest head or the smallest ego in his career. 

And for Denver, what possible good does this do? I continue to be stunned that they walked away from Harris-Favors-3-No.1s. That's an obscene package for one player, even a superstar, if you're not looking to take on major salary. Now they're looking at Bynum only? That's $15 mil next season. You're going to be paying $15 million for a triple-knee-injury still-raw center whose never had to carry a franchise in any meaningful capacity? How much lower is Ujiri looking to drop value, here? What's next, trading Melo for Stephen Jackson, straight up?

Royce Young: That's my main question too, Matt. Does this really improve both teams all that much? 

A healthy Bynum is definitely a building block piece. He's something you go for. But he has constant questions surrounding him and his knee. 

And how does Melo fit in with Kobe? How are there possibly enough shots for those two to be happy. If Ron Artest was frustrated with Kobe and Pau Gasol hogging too much offense, he's really going to hate playing with Melo and Kobe. 

Matt Moore: And all this is before we start to look at La La Vasquez and Khloe Kardashian on the same team, along with Monica. It's like a superego superstorm.

Ben Golliver: Basketball wives aren't exactly my forte, so I'll let that one slide (for now) to say that I'm not crazy about this trade for Denver, either. Picks, youth, money and flexibility would be much better. But I'm not dead set against the idea of Bynum on a team that's been known for physical, hard-nosed play and solid rebounding. I think he's a building block piece who, although you have to pay him and manage his injury situation, can keep you in the playoff race for years to come. If you can find a way to weasel some picks in a related trade and dump Chauncey Billups on someone, this could become the NBA trade equivalent of settling for the ugly Kardashian sister. Did I just make a nearly-relevant pop culture zing? Let's end it there.

Since: Feb 15, 2008
Posted on: February 8, 2011 6:47 pm

Roundtable: Carmelo Anthony to the L.A. Lakers?

As they have Bynum is a building block that is always surrounded by questions of his health and knee.  If the guy was more consistent and playing all 82 games the Lakers have a championship calibre team and would not even entertain this deal at all.

But since Bynum missed 24 games this season, the Lakers defense is lacking, and obviously Ron Ron is not getting the job done on D.  Why not entertain a guy that can put up 20 points any given night and possibly 50 a night?

Melo would add instant offense, but the trade off is the Lakers giving up interior defense.

I think it's a no brainer, if Melo wants to come to LA - make it happen Mitch "don't call me cupcake" Kupchak.


Since: Dec 10, 2006
Posted on: February 8, 2011 6:46 pm

Roundtable: Carmelo Anthony to the L.A. Lakers?

Yes I agree. This discussion underrates Carmelo. He is a top 5 player. Also I think that if the Lakers are looking at this, it is because they are anticipating a final with the Heat and a Kobe/ Carmelo vs Lebron/ Wade matchup. Even without Bynum the Laker frontcourt can easily outplay the Heat frontcourt. If it is Boston they can just go small at times and force the Celt frontcourt to chase them.

The other issue is Bynum's health. He could be a future all star but with all his knee problems that is a huge maybe.

Denver is running out of options. We saw what FA did to Toronto and Clevelend. Denver is next on the list and Knicks have little to offer- and nothing that compares to Bynum's upside.

I say it happens and the Lakers will be better for it. And they may shore it up by getting a grinding big man to replace Bynam.

Since: Jun 8, 2010
Posted on: February 8, 2011 6:39 pm

Roundtable: Carmelo Anthony to the L.A. Lakers?

Dear God NO!

Since: Sep 7, 2006
Posted on: February 8, 2011 6:04 pm

Round table: Carmelo Anthony to the L.A. Lakers?

Good gawd, I can't believe I am reading alleged experts in their field discuss that trading Bynum for Carmelo is not a steal for the Lakers....
It's just crazy, Carmelo will make the Lakers a lot better, period, of of debate, over and out.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or