Blog Entry

Players could hold charity games during lockout

Posted on: April 7, 2011 9:08 pm
Edited on: April 7, 2011 9:09 pm
Posted by Royce Young

If there's a lockout -- I like how we're all still saying "if" as if it's still not a sure thing -- players are going to want to play somewhere. Some have talked about taking their talents overseas, including Dirk, Kobe, Andrei Kirilenko and a few others.

Player union president Derek Fisher has an idea -- charity exhibition games. As told to

“I’d say it’s possible right now,” the Lakers guard said after Wednesday night’s game at Oracle Arena. “We’re so focused on trying not to be in that situation, so it’s tough to go into full-scale planning on those types of situations. But at the same time, we have a responsibility as a union and as an association to really keep options that are viable open for our guys.

“There’s so many challenges logistically, in terms of where you play, having the arenas, having officials, security – all the things that a lot of times we don’t have to deal with because the league is doing those things. But we looked into it before, we’ve looked into it a little bit now. Until we see that it’s something that we’re really going to have to look forward to doing, right now, it’s still just kind of floating out there.”

Definitely a pretty cool idea, especially because we're going to be dying for some hoops come November. God forbid if there isn't a plan yet to have games that count for something, a charity exhibition is better than nothing.

The main problem as Fisher said are the logistics of it, but I'm sure that can get settled if they're actually serious abou it. Where do you play? Who officiates? Who promotes it? How do you sell tickets? What happens if a player gets hurt? Is he contract voided?

All of that would need to be sorted out. I like how "charity" is tossed in there though. The owners are going to want to squeeze players that live paycheck-to-paycheck. That's the whole idea of a lockout. The players are "locked out" and therefore can't play, so therefore they can't get paid. Therefore they succumb because they need the cash. So maybe the "charity" Fisher speaks of is the Irresponsible NBA Player Foundation that will fund all the guys that can withstand a lockout.

If that were true, then this would pretty much be the best idea ever. I think Derek Fisher would need a presidential promotion.

Category: NBA

Since: Apr 26, 2007
Posted on: April 8, 2011 2:48 pm

Players could hold charity games during lockout

This is awesome!!!  A group of men who make millions of dollars a year, thinking of doing something as selfless as playing games in a lockout year for charity??  I can't wait to see this!!  Oh, wait, all the really talented players who actually want to keep playing aren't going to play for free if there is someone in Europe willing to pay them, that means Kobe and the likes will be overseas for the season.  I'm sure LeBron would love to do something charitable and continue to play the game he loves for free?  No, if I correctly recall, LeBron (and many others) skipped the Dallas All-Star Game charity event for children to go protest owner-Stern talks of their upcoming CBA deadline.  Well, maybe the guys on Derek Fisher's skill level will stay and play charity basketball.  I would love to see John Brockman, Ben Uzoh, Matt Carroll, Jordan Hill, Patrick Mills, and Steve Blake hoop it up for charity next year.  That would be some spectacular basketball. 

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or