Blog Entry

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

Posted on: April 14, 2011 1:56 pm
Edited on: April 14, 2011 5:01 pm
Posted by Royce Young

I. Intro

I don't know why Danny Granger decided to open his mouth. For some reason, he decided to blurt out that he thinks the Bulls would be easier to beat in a seven-game series than the Celtics. I have no idea either.

Because maybe the best shot this young Indiana team had coming in against Chicago was the surprise attack. Maybe the Pacers sneak up on the Bulls, steal Game 1 and then at least make things interesting. Now there's none of that. The Bulls heard you Danny, and they'll be ready.

I don't think this series will be all that glamorous. It's a 62-win team versus a 37-win one. That's a large, large difference. This is a great team versus an average one. It is the postseason and sometimes fun things happen, but this is kind of a what-you-see-is-what-you-get situation. It's hard to picture any scenario other than the inevitable unless Derrick Rose, Carlos Boozer and Luol Deng get kidnapped by Larry Bird.

II. What Happened: A look at the season series

The Bulls took the season series 3-1, by an average margin of 11.5 points per game. Indiana's three losses through were under the Jim O'Brien regime. The one win was behind interim Frank Vogel, which came in overtime. Other than that Indiana win, the season series was entirely lopsided. Chicago won by 19, 13 and 21 with those three games never even really being as close as even that number indicates.

Here's the bad news for Indiana: In those four games, they shot just 38 percent from the floor. The Pacers struggled scoring the ball from everywhere. The paint was sealed, the 3-point line was covered and Indiana's go-to guys never got clean looks. In their win, it was all about a surprising big night from Tyler Hansbrough. Not encouaging.

III. The Easy Stuff: Derrick Rose is good

Do I really need to sit here and tell you that Derrick Rose is good, that he's the best and most important player in this series and that if he plays even close to what he's capable of, the Bulls will cruise? Yeah, I probably do.

Derrick Rose is good, he's the best and most important player in this series and if he plays even close to what he's capable of, the Bulls will cruise.

It's easy to label Rose something like an "X-factor" but that's almost disrespectful. He is The Factor. He changes everything. Indiana has absolutely no one qualified to guard him and can't match him in crunch time. If these games stay close, the Bulls have a clear go-to scorer. Indiana has some decent players, but nothing the caliber of Rose.

IV. Secret of the Series: Can Indiana score?

Under Vogel, the Pacers have tried to become more of an up-tempo, high volume shooting team. They want to get up around 90 attempts a game. Under O'Brien, they tried to grind it out defensively and while they had some early success, couldn't sustain. Now, they want to run you.

That's of course interesting because they're going up against the premier defensive team in the NBA. The Bulls rank first in basically every defensive category, most important of which is defensive efficiency where they allow just 100.3 points per 100 possessions. (That's awesome. )

The Pacers are technically a better defensive team than offensive one (rank 12th in defensive efficiency, 23rd in offensive), but that's not the point. They want to try to score more than 100. Under Vogel, they consistently topped the century mark. In games they did that, the Pacers won a lot more. In wins, Indiana averaged 107.8 points per game. In losses, 93.2. That's a major difference.

Indiana is looking to outscore the Bulls, which of course isn't the best strategy, but it's probably the only one. I mean, what else are you going to do, beat the Bulls at their own game?

V. The Dinosaur Narrative : “Chicago can't win now because they haven't won before”

I keep hearing people ask this question. The Rose led Bulls haven't ever won a playoff series; how can they win the whole thing? I kind of think that's a dumb question. Mainly because, Chicago will get their series win pretty easily over Indiana. So that'll be out of the way and the Bulls can get their hand stamped and move on.

But this inexperience card is one people love to play. Obviously the Pacers are far more untested in terms of playoff basketball, but the issue is whether or not these young Bulls will feel the pressure of being top dog coming in. I don't think so. Rose has already proven he elevates his game in the postseason, Tom Thibodeau has a championship ring and there are a number of quality veterans on the Bulls roster.

It's stressful having expectations on you, no doubt. The Bulls haven't gone deep into the postseason yet. But they're going to get part of it out of the way to start with and the Pacers are just going to be a small bump in the road.

VI. The Line-Item Veto: Who wins each match-up?

PG: Darren Collison has become a pretty solid point guard in the mold of Chris Paul. He creates, slashes and scores on his own. The Bulls have Derrick Rose. This isn't even close.

SG: The ugliest, least important matchup is definitely found in the 2-guard hold. Keith Bogans, a defensive specialist, versus Paul George, an athletic but extremely raw rookie. Not exactly marquee, this one.

SF: I think Danny Granger versus Luol Deng is one of the more underrated head-to-heads in the entire opening round. Obviously Indiana's success hinges largely on Granger and Deng is a terrific defender. Plus, Deng can score the ball. In the previous four meetings, Deng has gotten the best of Granger so I see no reason why not to go with him here.

PF: Tyler Hansbrough has been pretty good the last two months. He's high energy, high effort and has a decent little mid-range game. Clearly Carlos Boozer is better, but I think this matchup is a bit closer than it appears.

C: If the good Roy Hibbert shows up, he's a tough matchup for Joakim Noah. The good Hibbert can score, rebound, block shots and control a game from the post. But if it's the bad Hibbert, Noah will eat him alive. That's what Noah tends to do with people. He's a terrific post defender. But Hibbert has a lot of size on him and Indiana needs one edge in these matchups, so I'll give it to Hibbert.

Bench: Neither is overwhelmingly good, but I like Chicago's because of players like Kurt Thomas, Kyle Korver, Taj Gibson, Ronnie Brewer and Omer Asik. All make nightly impacts for Chicago. Indiana has some guys that can Heat up off the pine like Brandon Rush, Mike Dunleavy and James Posey, plus Josh McRoberts who has been a surprise, but the Bulls have depth in their depth.

Coach: Both are rookies, but one is more of a rookie than the other. Thibodeau will likely be this season's Coach of the Year and has transformed the Bulls into one of the elite defensive teams in the league. Vogel has done an admirable job with the Pacers, but not even his organization sees him as head coaching material moving forward. A clear edge for Chicago.

VII. Conclusion

The Pacers are a pretty good "We're just happy to be here!" team. With only 37 wins, they shouldn't even be in the final 16, but here they are. They know they're up against a favorite and know deep down the goal would be to win two games. This postseason would be an overwhelming success if they were able to pull that off.

But I have a hard time seeing it. Almost every matchup favors the Bulls as well as style of play. Indiana will play them hard and probably play them pretty close, but this has sweep written all over it. The Pacers won't do any sneaking up because of Granger's bulletin board material, so their best shot at stealing a game is gone. However, I'd like to think the Pacers will be excited enough to pull one off at home, just to treat the Indy fans. Prediction: Bulls in five.

VIII. Video Preview

The Chicago Bulls will take on the Indiana Pacers in this Central Division playoff matchup. Will Derrick Rose help lead the Bulls to a championship? Ian Eagle and Ken Berger preview this playoff matchup. 


Since: Sep 29, 2010
Posted on: April 16, 2011 2:59 pm

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

Ur looking like ur right may have a least a one game win for the pacers, but bulls still win

Since: Apr 1, 2011
Posted on: April 16, 2011 10:14 am

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

Your crazy. Bulls defense will hold the Pacers under 80 points per game.

Since: Dec 3, 2007
Posted on: April 15, 2011 11:07 pm

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

Being a Pacers fan, I say they sweep the Bulls.  In reality, a playoff appearance is refreshing after a long, depressing road that started with the Brawl at the Palace of Auburn Hills.  Such hope in 2004 (7-2 record and leading Detroit by 15 with less than two minutes to go in the game) was crushed by the stupidity of all involved (especially the fan that threw the drink on Artest).  We Indiana fans hope for a good show from our Pacers against Chicago and look forward to the future. 

Since: Nov 17, 2008
Posted on: April 15, 2011 9:06 am

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

I will start out by saying I agree with just about everything in this preview.  The one thing I don't agree with is the comment that the Pacers shouldn't even be here.  How can that be said?  This isn't college where a group of hacks decide the field.  The Pacers might not have had a playoff type season but they won more games than the teams below them to make it.  There might be better teams that should be there in the place of the Pacers but the facts are facts and the Pacers won more than those teams.  For what it is worth I don't see the Pacers winning a game and think this will be a four game sweep.

Since: May 12, 2009
Posted on: April 15, 2011 3:10 am

Scrub basket ball dork...

There is just one thing to learn from this series... The Bulls are MUCH better than the Pacers.
Calling me a basket ball dork?  Your the one thats trying to find drama in probably the most lop-sided series in the playoffs...
Your right, you will learn something.

Since: Feb 12, 2011
Posted on: April 15, 2011 1:24 am

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

I'm a Pacers fan and I just want to see it close at times, we haven't had much to cheer about for the past few years. So in reality I'm just hoping this is a stepping stone for future playoff appearances. That being said this analyzation of the Pacers, "Under Vogel, the Pacers have tried to become more of an up-tempo, high volume shooting team. They want to get up around 90 attempts a game. Under O'Brien, they tried to grind it out defensively and while they had some early success, couldn't sustain. Now, they want to run you " is not true. True O'Brien did try to emphasize defense more (finally) this year, but his overall philosphy was always to put up quick shots and score lots of points, primarly from outside the arc. Vogel has actually preached passing the ball to find the best shots (not the first look), pick and rolls and "smash mouth" basketball by using his bigs. Keep in mind OB wasn't even playing Hansborough (he loved fours who could shot the three aka T. Murphy) and didn't utilize Hibbert's strengths and he didn't like using point guards to facilitate the offense. That being said (which kinda of negates this articles' anaylsis of the Pacers) the Pacers are playing the hottest team in NBA with probably the best young superstar since Kobe, for sure the best player for the Bulls since Jordan, so things are going to be extremely difficult. Let's just hope for the Pacers' sake this isn't the beginning of a new era of what happened the last time the Pacers got better. But I have a sneaking suspicion, outside of an injury to Rose, that the Bulls dominance of nineties is about to be repeated for the next decade.  

Since: Mar 6, 2011
Posted on: April 15, 2011 12:21 am

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

Only a scrub basketball dork would say "stop over-analysing" a playoff series.  Even a mismatch....and this is probably one.....has things to teach.  Hibbert is underrated, George is a guy with sick upside.....and Hansborough has had a terrific second half under Vogel. Boozer is only an average defender.....and so Indiana should at least be able to exploit that a bit.  But this is a tune up for Chicago........they should sweep.......but it will be fun, and very interesting.......Indiana has nothing to lose.

Since: May 12, 2009
Posted on: April 14, 2011 11:54 pm

Why are we having the discussion?

The Pacers suck... The Bulls are good.  Put your money on the Bulls and stop over-analyzing a sure thing.

Since: Dec 16, 2009
Posted on: April 14, 2011 9:48 pm

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

Please bear in mind that the following is not just limited to the Chicago/Indiana series.  Rather, it is a reflection, and some words of warning for teams visiting Chicago in this year's post season.  

One thing that I think is being overlooked is that the Bulls have beaten every team in the league and have not lost more than 2 games in a row throughout the regular season.  Some might argue that the playoffs are a different landscape all together, which I guess is true (personally. I don't read to much into that stuff).  If you wanna take that position then let's not forget that Chicago has home court and the Bulls were 36-5 at the United Center this year.  I'm no basketball analyst, but to me, that spells trouble for the opposition.  
Now that Granger has shot his mouth off a bit, which I think is being somewhat overstated. Still, it'll only introduce gasoline to flame and will materialize itself in the form of Derrick Rose.  Bulls in 5.

Since: Nov 15, 2008
Posted on: April 14, 2011 3:41 pm

Pacers-Bulls Preview: Very good, very average

A healthy Bulls team wins the series just not a sweep.  It's not easy to sweep in the NBA playoffs and the Pacers will play for some sort of pride.  Rose will be a handful for them.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or