Blog Entry

Realigning the NBA

Posted on: September 5, 2011 1:14 pm
Edited on: September 5, 2011 1:42 pm
Posted by Royce Young

Conference realignment has sort of taken over the world the past few weeks. Texas A&M pretty much put the nail in the coffin for the Big 12 by bolting for the SEC and because of it, a whole new chain of events have tipped over. The landscape of college football could look a whole lot different in a few months. Or in a few weeks. Or even tomorrow.

But you know what else could use a little realigning? The NBA's divisions. They're kind of a mess. It's not going to be as a result of some $300 million network, recruiting ties or competitive advantages. Nope. For the NBA, it's more just about common sense. Geographically, the divisions are kind of a mess. In 2011 that's not as huge a deal as it was in 1981 because travel is much easier. You can go from Portland to Oklahoma City in just a few hours.

However, chartered travel is experience. Fuel is very pricey. And with the NBA and teams supposedly losing so much money, why not exhaust every option to cut costs and realign the divisions so they make a lot more sense? Why not group teams together that are hundreds, not thousands, of miles apart?

Plus, it just makes a lot more sense to have structured regions. Grouping teams together based on geography does more to forge rivalries, gives fans a chance to commute between games if the want to and gives the players less travel and more days of rest. All good, right?

So if you're going to spend all this time restructuring a new collective bargaining agreement, why not fix the divisions too? Here's how they should look:


San Antonio
Oklahoma City

The NBA's new Southwest division is the American League East, the SEC West, of the league. It's a group of five teams that are all pretty good. Things change though and in 15 years, this could be the weakest division in the league. But for now, it'd be pretty good.

And it just makes sense. Dallas and Oklahoma City are about three hours via car away from each other. San Antonio, Dallas and Houston are in the same state. And OKC and the Texas teams and Phoenix just have one state separating them, which is a whole lot better than five.


Clearly the division that needed the biggest overhaul is the Northwest, mainly because of the Sonics transformation into the Oklahoma City Thunder. When the team was in Seattle, the division made a lot more sense. Now it doesn't. That's why a midwestern division with makes a lot more sense.

That creates somewhat of a problem in the Northwest though. There's not a great fit. So for the sake of the argument, the Northwest has to make the Big 12 and peace out. No more Northwest, but instead the new Midwest.

The new Midwest is still a bit spread out, but all the teams are at least located somewhat centrally in the country. A trip from Utah to Milwaukee won't be quick, but the Jazz, Nuggets and Timerwolves have been oddballs in the Northwest. It's not an ideal division with teams right next door to each other, but it makes a lot more sense than the current setup.

Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Clippers
Golden State

Moving Phoenix away from the Lakers is a bummer, because those two teams are historical rivals that have always competed in the same division. But if A&M and Texas can separate, I think we can live with the Suns and Lakers moving apart.

The Pacific now features five teams that are actually next to the Pacific Ocean, which seems like it should count for something. Plus having the Blazers and Lakers together makes up for separating the Suns and Lakers.



Really, the new Central was the inspiration for this. Why aren't the Raptors in this division? Look at how close those teams are to each other. I think you could almost ride your bike between arenas. The old Central was really good too -- maybe better -- but the Bucks have to move. So it's the Raptors who replace them and the solid geographic setup remains.

New York
New Jersey

Nothing too radical here. Five cities that you can transport between using a train. Old rivalries are preserved and the Wizards are added, which frankly, makes a lot of sense.

New Orleans

Two teams would swap conferences with the Bucks moving back to the West and the Hornets heading to the East. Not that this would upset the competitive balance of the league or anything, but it just makes a lot more sense for the Hornets to be placed in a division with Orlando, Charlotte, Atlanta and Miami.

And let me add this: If college football has no issue tossing tradition and historical rivalries out the window, why not just eliminate conferences all together? It would be a radical move, but what's the point of the East and West, other than just that's the structure of the playoffs? If it were one unified "super" conference, that would finally solve the issues of a 50-win Western team missing the postseason while a 37-win Eastern team slips into the eight-seed.

You could even just build the league into three 10-team divisions. Combine the Southwest and the Pacific, the Midwest and the Central, and the Atlantic and the Southeast. There are your super-divisions. Now you can keep teams playing more in their division than anything else and cut down on long road trips. It would make a West coast road trip for the Mavericks a whole heck of a lot more interesting.

Basically, we'd be looking at a league with three sub-conferences and once the playoffs started, seeding would just be based from that. Almost like the NCAA tournament, you could set two regions and seed from there. Head-to-head tiebreakers, division records and all that stuff would separate any identical records. Just an idea while we're brainstorming, you know?

(Note: I don't really love that idea, quite honestly. But I was just throwing it out there. One of those things that probably makes sense, but wouldn't ever happen. Much like Bill Simmons' terrific "Entertaining As Hell Tournament." Really, a unified conference makes it easier to implicate the tournament too.)

Let's face it: The West has kind of sort of dominated the past decade. Sports operate in cycles, but if there's a way to prevent that, should we? The West compiled a record of 2,257-1,643 against the East from 1999-2008 and over the last 13 seasons has represented 10 champions. That's pretty dominant. That'll change eventually, but what really is the point of the conferences, other than the standard, "that's just the way it's always been done" answer? 

All that is after the fact though: Divisional realignment is the start. Fixing the structure of the postseason would be the ideal next step. It's kind of like a plus-one for college football. Maybe a pipe dream, but something that's really in the best interest of the game. But if anything's to be done, it's to realign the divisions so they at least make a little more sense. Preserve rivalires, start new ones, save money, cut down on travel and hopefully, help the league grow a little bit more.

Picture via Jockpost

Since: Jul 5, 2010
Posted on: September 6, 2011 8:06 pm

Realigning the NBA

Dang Sigma school's in session - well done!

Since: Sep 24, 2006
Posted on: September 6, 2011 4:55 pm

Realigning the NBA

When I first saw the MAP, I thought that is one tight map ... I think I used to have a bedspread just like it (except with NFL teams).

But upon closer inspection, the whole Wizards/Bobcats territories are way off (credit to those who mentioned it first) ... so fix it or nix it.

Plus, the NBA would never re-align simply to save on fuel costs (too proud), and how many fans do you know that actually drive or travel to away games? Not even in the Playoffs.

Fun topic, though.

Since: Aug 24, 2006
Posted on: September 6, 2011 4:08 pm

Realigning the NBA

You are definitely thinking about it all wrong....ever heard of airplanes?  The differences in miles are minute in travel times via airplane.

If you want to add numbers, why don't you add population size in the areas that would cater to the divisions?  The west/midwest contain alot of areas of lesser populations.
Ever heard of READING! Even in airplanes, more miles means more fuel. This is not a small point as time is not a factor. That clear?

jateeluv, you should READ the article before you try to question someone else. The point about saving fuel IS Royce's idea.

However, chartered travel is experience. Fuel is very pricey. And with the NBA and teams supposedly losing so much money, why not exhaust every option to cut costs and realign the divisions so they make a lot more sense? Why not group teams together that are hundreds, not thousands, of miles apart

My points stands as he fails in the concept he put out as a reason for this realigning. Understand why the numbers are important now?

And about airplanes, I build them, so yes, I have heard and know a little about them.

BTW, What does grouping by population do? Are you trying to propose Small market/Big market divisions? Is there any thinking behind that ? Flesh that out, will you.

Back to the realignment, this only makes sense for some teams while telling others you don't count. The Suns are told to take a hike. A long hike. As are the Bucks. Why would anyone want to move a Wisconsin team away from playing Chicago and Detroit?

Yes, Raptors and Cavs would go well together but at what cost. Since the NBA does not pay for each teams travel cost, this is a huge point. Toronto to NY twice and Boston is a lot less fuel than Phoenix to Texas 3 times. And Bucks to Utah and Denver? Really?

The point I would not bring up before is that Royce is in Oklahoma and his little tweeking would do wonders for the Thunder by placing them in a division with the Texas teams. I had hoped someone else would point that out.

This whole setup does place the Thunder with built in rivals from Texas. But at the expense of the Suns, Hornets and Bucks. It lets the Thunder go right down I-35 in just a few hundred miles. Take note because that is the first division he tackles. He even says "It's kind of like a plus-one for college football. "

Yes, just like driving down for OU/Texas, times 3. But most NBA fans don't follow their team based on college rivalires. Most don't care if they get players from the local or state team.

The realigning of division as Royce set it up up hurts several other teams but aids the Thunder. It really just looks like a homer piece, in my mind.

Since: Aug 21, 2006
Posted on: September 6, 2011 1:36 pm

Realigning the NBA

Geographically speaking, this reallignment makes a lot of sense.

Since: Aug 30, 2006
Posted on: September 6, 2011 11:45 am

Realigning the NBA

Agree dankev.  Forcing the tiny Milwaukee market to de-familiarize its competition would be dooming a franchise that isn't doing all that hot to begin with.  The Packers, Brewers, and Badgers for the most part compete with teams in the same region as the Bucks, and this switch would be idiotic just because the puzzle seems to piece together this way.  

Come to think of it, this article is pretty pointless.  In fact, the only somewhat geographic outlier to make that cute puzzle fit together better is Oklahoma City, which was caused by the move from Seattle.  We can deal with that, since they're close enough to Denver anyway.

Since: Sep 15, 2006
Posted on: September 6, 2011 11:24 am

Realigning the NBA

The divisional realignments proposed all make sense.  The only way I could improve upon those listed was to make Toronto a part of the Midwest division along with Milwaukee, Minnesota, Utah, and Denver, and move Memphis to the Central division along with Chicago, Indiana, Cleveland and Detroit.  Why?  Toronto is a lot closer to Milwaukee and Minnesota than Memphis is to the rest of the proposed midwestern teams.  Also because Memphis is close to Chicago, Cleveland and Indiana.  The proposal makes real sense otherwise.  Washington should be in the East and take advantage of the natural geographic rivalry with Philadelphia.  The NBA is crying over losing money, so realignment is a huge way of cutting expenses.  If they don't realign, then how can the NBA legitimately ask players to take a pay cut?  The NBA needs to do everything they can to cut costs first.

Since: Dec 29, 2006
Posted on: September 6, 2011 12:04 am

Realigning the NBA

want to improve NBA get rid of 10 teams..make the play better and eliminate cities who care less...too many bad players in NBA taking paychecks that are useless

Since: Mar 30, 2010
Posted on: September 5, 2011 11:50 pm

Realigning the NBA

Seem like a good idea but some good teams would not make the playoffs.I like the divison the way it is but i would like the hornets in the eastern confernce and the Bucks in the eastern.I like an Hornets Hawks rivalry just like the Saints and Falcons the dirty south showdown.

Since: Oct 22, 2007
Posted on: September 5, 2011 11:47 pm

Realigning the NBA

"Did the entire city of Phoenix take a wizz in your corn flakes?"


Since: Dec 12, 2009
Posted on: September 5, 2011 11:37 pm

Realigning the NBA

Wow, I'm a bit suprised that Clayton did'nt blame the players for the current alignment


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or