Blog Entry

Realigning the NBA

Posted on: September 5, 2011 1:14 pm
Edited on: September 5, 2011 1:42 pm
Posted by Royce Young

Conference realignment has sort of taken over the world the past few weeks. Texas A&M pretty much put the nail in the coffin for the Big 12 by bolting for the SEC and because of it, a whole new chain of events have tipped over. The landscape of college football could look a whole lot different in a few months. Or in a few weeks. Or even tomorrow.

But you know what else could use a little realigning? The NBA's divisions. They're kind of a mess. It's not going to be as a result of some $300 million network, recruiting ties or competitive advantages. Nope. For the NBA, it's more just about common sense. Geographically, the divisions are kind of a mess. In 2011 that's not as huge a deal as it was in 1981 because travel is much easier. You can go from Portland to Oklahoma City in just a few hours.

However, chartered travel is experience. Fuel is very pricey. And with the NBA and teams supposedly losing so much money, why not exhaust every option to cut costs and realign the divisions so they make a lot more sense? Why not group teams together that are hundreds, not thousands, of miles apart?

Plus, it just makes a lot more sense to have structured regions. Grouping teams together based on geography does more to forge rivalries, gives fans a chance to commute between games if the want to and gives the players less travel and more days of rest. All good, right?

So if you're going to spend all this time restructuring a new collective bargaining agreement, why not fix the divisions too? Here's how they should look:


San Antonio
Oklahoma City

The NBA's new Southwest division is the American League East, the SEC West, of the league. It's a group of five teams that are all pretty good. Things change though and in 15 years, this could be the weakest division in the league. But for now, it'd be pretty good.

And it just makes sense. Dallas and Oklahoma City are about three hours via car away from each other. San Antonio, Dallas and Houston are in the same state. And OKC and the Texas teams and Phoenix just have one state separating them, which is a whole lot better than five.


Clearly the division that needed the biggest overhaul is the Northwest, mainly because of the Sonics transformation into the Oklahoma City Thunder. When the team was in Seattle, the division made a lot more sense. Now it doesn't. That's why a midwestern division with makes a lot more sense.

That creates somewhat of a problem in the Northwest though. There's not a great fit. So for the sake of the argument, the Northwest has to make the Big 12 and peace out. No more Northwest, but instead the new Midwest.

The new Midwest is still a bit spread out, but all the teams are at least located somewhat centrally in the country. A trip from Utah to Milwaukee won't be quick, but the Jazz, Nuggets and Timerwolves have been oddballs in the Northwest. It's not an ideal division with teams right next door to each other, but it makes a lot more sense than the current setup.

Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Clippers
Golden State

Moving Phoenix away from the Lakers is a bummer, because those two teams are historical rivals that have always competed in the same division. But if A&M and Texas can separate, I think we can live with the Suns and Lakers moving apart.

The Pacific now features five teams that are actually next to the Pacific Ocean, which seems like it should count for something. Plus having the Blazers and Lakers together makes up for separating the Suns and Lakers.



Really, the new Central was the inspiration for this. Why aren't the Raptors in this division? Look at how close those teams are to each other. I think you could almost ride your bike between arenas. The old Central was really good too -- maybe better -- but the Bucks have to move. So it's the Raptors who replace them and the solid geographic setup remains.

New York
New Jersey

Nothing too radical here. Five cities that you can transport between using a train. Old rivalries are preserved and the Wizards are added, which frankly, makes a lot of sense.

New Orleans

Two teams would swap conferences with the Bucks moving back to the West and the Hornets heading to the East. Not that this would upset the competitive balance of the league or anything, but it just makes a lot more sense for the Hornets to be placed in a division with Orlando, Charlotte, Atlanta and Miami.

And let me add this: If college football has no issue tossing tradition and historical rivalries out the window, why not just eliminate conferences all together? It would be a radical move, but what's the point of the East and West, other than just that's the structure of the playoffs? If it were one unified "super" conference, that would finally solve the issues of a 50-win Western team missing the postseason while a 37-win Eastern team slips into the eight-seed.

You could even just build the league into three 10-team divisions. Combine the Southwest and the Pacific, the Midwest and the Central, and the Atlantic and the Southeast. There are your super-divisions. Now you can keep teams playing more in their division than anything else and cut down on long road trips. It would make a West coast road trip for the Mavericks a whole heck of a lot more interesting.

Basically, we'd be looking at a league with three sub-conferences and once the playoffs started, seeding would just be based from that. Almost like the NCAA tournament, you could set two regions and seed from there. Head-to-head tiebreakers, division records and all that stuff would separate any identical records. Just an idea while we're brainstorming, you know?

(Note: I don't really love that idea, quite honestly. But I was just throwing it out there. One of those things that probably makes sense, but wouldn't ever happen. Much like Bill Simmons' terrific "Entertaining As Hell Tournament." Really, a unified conference makes it easier to implicate the tournament too.)

Let's face it: The West has kind of sort of dominated the past decade. Sports operate in cycles, but if there's a way to prevent that, should we? The West compiled a record of 2,257-1,643 against the East from 1999-2008 and over the last 13 seasons has represented 10 champions. That's pretty dominant. That'll change eventually, but what really is the point of the conferences, other than the standard, "that's just the way it's always been done" answer? 

All that is after the fact though: Divisional realignment is the start. Fixing the structure of the postseason would be the ideal next step. It's kind of like a plus-one for college football. Maybe a pipe dream, but something that's really in the best interest of the game. But if anything's to be done, it's to realign the divisions so they at least make a little more sense. Preserve rivalires, start new ones, save money, cut down on travel and hopefully, help the league grow a little bit more.

Picture via Jockpost

Since: Aug 21, 2006
Posted on: September 5, 2011 11:04 pm

Realigning the NBA

Oh, and Bill Simmons' tournament is the worst idea in NBA history.

Since: Aug 21, 2006
Posted on: September 5, 2011 11:01 pm

Realigning the NBA

Boy, that's off. Idaho is definitely Jazz, not Blazers. Virginia is the Wizards, not the Bobcats.

Since: Jul 4, 2007
Posted on: September 5, 2011 10:56 pm

Realigning the NBA

i would love to know why this picture shows the bobcats in 3 freakin states while the wizards are given only crappy maryland. seriously nobody in VA cares about carolina sports, unless you are near the sparsley populated NC/VA border. i know the wizards suck, but really? the bobcats? my off-topic rant is over.

Since: Feb 21, 2008
Posted on: September 5, 2011 10:44 pm

Typical East Coast moron

Chicago and Milwaukee and 90 miles apart and you want to send the Bucks into the West and replace them in their Division with Toronto? The Bulls and Bucks rivalry goes back to 1968-69(do the math!). Uh, no! Try doing something like sperating Knicks-Nets or Sixers Wizards. See what kind of fallout you get for that!

Since: Sep 22, 2006
Posted on: September 5, 2011 8:49 pm

Realigning the NBA

You are definitely thinking about it all wrong....ever heard of airplanes?  The differences in miles are minute in travel times via airplane.

If you want to add numbers, why don't you add population size in the areas that would cater to the divisions?  The west/midwest contain alot of areas of lesser populations.

I'm glad you made your opinions, but did not offer up a solution yourself. 

I like what Royce did with this.  It took much more talent than your post.

Since: Jul 29, 2009
Posted on: September 5, 2011 7:55 pm

Realigning the NBA

does anyone even care about the NBA?

Strike ON!!!!!

Since: Sep 5, 2011
Posted on: September 5, 2011 4:05 pm

Realigning the NBA

I like it.  The new Midwest is spread out, so the league has to find a way to focus on those teams travel so that the extra burden is lessened.  Looking at realignment now, during the lockout, is good too. 

Since: Aug 24, 2006
Posted on: September 5, 2011 3:42 pm

Realigning the NBA

"want to send"

Since: Aug 24, 2006
Posted on: September 5, 2011 3:31 pm

Realigning the NBA How WRONG IS this plan?

I don't know where Royce grew up or has driven in a car but it's clear he has not driven much past the Mississippi river.

And it is very clear when it come to geography, he is NOT smarter than a 5th grader.

"Geographically" speaking, this plan needs a map with miles listed, not a grade school puzzle map of the USA.

How wrong is this plan? Let me count the ways. The first thing is to add the Suns to the Texas-Ok. group by saying they are only a state apart. Watch carefully Royce.

That state could hold TEN Northeast states! Phoenix to LA, about 375 miles (2 teams) and to GS about 740. Phoenix to San Antonio 980, Phoenix to Dallas 1070. Abou the same to Rockets and Thunder.

Saving a lot of gas there, I think NOT! Did the entire city of Phoenix take a wizz in your corn flakes?

New Orleans to Houston, about 350 miles, NO to Dallas 520 and to Memphis 345. New Orleans to Miami 870, NO to Charlotte about 710. Even the "nearby" city of Atlanta is 470 miles. Even if you note air mile to Orlando and Miami will be less, it's only about 150 less.

And what did the Bucks do to tick you off? If you thought what was good for the T-Wolves was go for Bucks to fly half the country. They are on the Great Lakes with Bulls and Pistons and you want to sent them to the Rockies? It is the same problem for every team in your Midwest!

I'll stop there but it's clear save money is not part of this plan. Nor is cutting down on travel for teams not on either coast.

Rethink the plan and this time , do the math and map it out.

Since: Aug 20, 2006
Posted on: September 5, 2011 3:10 pm

Realigning the NBA

Conferences are kind of dumb in the NBA.  It makes sense in baseball because they are still technically two different leagues.  And in the NFL you have the old AFL-NFL deal.  In the NBA, it's useless.  All it does it make the #1 and #2 teams in the country less likely to play for the finals.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or