Blog Entry

What's it about, Herb Kohl?

Posted on: November 16, 2011 10:55 am
 
By Matt Moore 

Herb Kohl is one of the owners who has pushed for the proposals that have resulted in the ongoing NBA lockout, according to multiple reports. The popular narrative goes as follows: small-market owners are tired fo being doormats and losing money on their teams so they want a system that guarantees profitability and levels the playing field for them to compete with the Lakers and Celtics of the world. There's a lot of variation in that depending on who you talk to (for example, Ted Leonsis who owns the Washington D.C. Wizards is one such "small-market" owner), but that's the basic storyline being told by many of the reports. 

If Kohl is on that side of the fence, though, it's a stunning reversal from public statements he's made in the past regarding what it means to own the Bucks. From Bucks blog Bucksketball:
“I’m not in this business to make any annual profits,” Kohl said after dismissing General Manager Larry Harris in 2008. “The value of the asset fortunately has appreciated over the years. On an annual basis, it’s a money-losing proposition. I’m in it because I love the sport, I love the competition and I love winning.”

At what point does our current reality, the reality that has connected Kohl with a group of owners now looking to tip the basketball related income scales heavily in their favor while making other radical system changes, contrast with Kohl’s traditional motives that don’t involve making money, rather just competing and keeping the team he loves in Milwaukee?
via Herb Kohl’s actions may be betraying his words |.

Bucksketball notes that in the past, Kohl has been a staunch supporter of an increase in revenue sharing, citing MLB's model.  So you can more easily understand this position than the caricature image of billionaire owners' gigantic maws trying to devour everything in existance. It's not unreasonable to want to be able to compete when you are at a disadvantage. You can argue the merits of whether or not good teams in big markets that make huge profits should have to share with their brethren, but this is at least something fans can agree with.

But then, as always, there's the money.

In that above quote, Kohl says he's not in this business to make any annual profits. And that's right decent of him. Having owners that just want to win for themselves and the fans really should be what professional sports, and in particular the NBA, is about. If you're trying to make a lot of money by owning an NBA team, to borrow a phrase, you're doing it wrong. That's not the path. So why then the revenue split tactics? Why shake the players down for 50/50 BRI or lower?

Furthermore, why isn't this an internal issue with the league? If you're looking to change the system, change the system. The players at any point after, say, August would happily have granted systemic changes in exchange for the BRI cut back. And a better revenue sharing system, a legitimate one that actually accounts for the unfathomable riches that come with each team's independent television deal, would more than have at least started the teams on the way back to profitability.

But again, we ask. What's this about, profitability or competitive balance? The league wants to maintain that it's about both. But in reality, what the NBA really needs is for its owners to decide a vision for their own ownership and stick with it.  
Comments

Since: Dec 5, 2006
Posted on: November 16, 2011 10:20 pm
 

What's it about, Herb Kohl?

The popular narrative goes as follows: small-market owners are tired fo being doormats and losing money on their teams so they want a system that guarantees profitability and levels the playing field for them to compete with the and of the world.
This is why many hear despair of having reasonable unbiased coverage from our writers. The objectionable statement here is 'guarantees profitability'. There is none of that in this latest offer. Overall the league owners recoup $266 million out or $300 million in annual losses. That is guaranteed losses not profitability. What Herb Kohl is asking is to reduce the losses every year. The 50-50 split does not go far enough to reduce losses. Especially when you consider the hundreds of millions earned by NY Knicks, LA Lakers, Chicago Bulls, Dallas Mavericks and Miami Heat skewing that total losses even more against the small market teams.

The owners are said (by David Stern) to have reached agreement on revenue sharing to double and then triple the current system. That process is separate and distinct from the CBA negotiations. The total losses and the individual team losses are being addressed in the CBA. The owners appear to only want the opportunity to make a profit. That has been lacking for all but a handful of teams. This is not on Herb Kohl.



Since: Jul 27, 2011
Posted on: November 16, 2011 2:21 pm
 

What's it about, Herb Kohl?

If competitive balance is what is desired, than there are only 2 things needed in the long run. Dump the draft lottery and pick based on results (like the NFL) and do not allow draft choices to be included in any trades. That way the Lakers and Celtics can't trade away a fringe player and end up with a high lottery pick. In the long run, the weak will get stronger and will restore competitive balance.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com