Blog Entry

Friday 5 with KB: Trade season approaches

Posted on: March 2, 2012 1:52 pm
Edited on: March 2, 2012 2:58 pm
 
By Matt Moore



In this week's edition of 
the Friday 5,
Ken Berger talks about how you should evaluate trade rumors, if anyone will ever touch Wilt's 100-point-game, and how David Stern's legacy has evolved. 

1. 50th Anniversary of Wilt scoring 100 this week. There's a lot of talk about whether it will happen again or not. Do you think if the NBA went through a hyper-scoring binge like we've seen in the past it could ever happen again, or be passed?

KB: Never. The game is too different, defenses are more sophisticated and the talent level is more equal than in 1962.

2. 'Tis the season, KB. What are the things fans should look for when judging the accuracy of a trade rumor?

KB: Excellent way to put it. You have to consider the source (who's reporting it and how many outlets are reporting it) and dissect the potential agendas that are at play. For example, is an agent trying to manufacture news because he wants his client out? Also, teams have dozens of conversations about possible trades at this time of year. The mere occurrence of dialogue isn't news; serious discussions, with details of proposals that have been exchanged, perhaps rising to the ownership level, should be valued above the garden variety, "Team X is shopping player Y." As Ricky Watters once said, "For who? For what?" Details are proof. Finally, most teams have several people in the front office who are authorized and in position to discuss possible trades, which clouds the inevitable denial of those discussions. When a GM or coach says, "I've never even spoken with that team," or, "I've never even had a conversation about Player X," that doesn't mean someone else in the organization who's authorized to have those discussions didn't do so. In short, it's a tangled web we weave in the weeks leading up to the trade deadline.

3. Steve Nash is both the most adamant he doesn't want to be traded and one of the most involved in trade rumors. Do the Suns know exactly what they want to do with him, considering their public statements of "Nash now, Nash forever?"

KB: The key question is, what does Nash want? He doesn't want to be out there publicly lobbying for a trade, but if he decides it's time to move on, I believe the Suns will try to oblige.

4. Michael Beasley's another name out there on the wire. Are coaches receptive to dealing with his... er... eccentricities?
 
KB: For a contender that needs versatile scoring punch (Lakers, Celtics, Magic), Beasley would be the ideal fit. The questions will become, can he be had for a second-round pick? And if not, will a team -- particularly the Lakers, who have two first-rounders -- become so desperate to upgrade that they'll part with one?

5. David Stern said in an interview with the Orlando Sentinel he can't be concerned with his legacy because it will impact his ability to do his job. What do you think Stern's legacy is today, given the events of the past 12 months?

KB: Any time you discuss legacy, it has to be a big-picture, textured discussion. Though the lockout, lost games and hard-ball negotiating tactics are fresh in our minds, those things can't move ahead of certain undeniable accomplishments like dramatically increasing national TV exposure and revenue and globalizing the brand. But depending on how things work out in New Orleans and Sacramento, Stern is in danger of having his legacy tarnished by franchise relocation. The financial circumstances in markets like those and Milwaukee, Charlotte and Memphis are grim. If the problems can't be solved by revenue sharing, then what? So Stern can't retire yet simply because he achieved a new collective bargaining agreement. He can't leave the NBA until he's leaving all 30 franchises (or however many there are when he leaves) on sound footing competitively and economically. So that part of his legacy, which includes over-expansion, is still to be determined.
Comments

Since: Dec 5, 2006
Posted on: March 2, 2012 10:53 pm
 

Friday 5 with KB: Trade season approaches

Zero-cool says:
Stern's legacy has already been tarnished and will remain tarnished!!  Fans will never forget the Chris Paul debacle, and how he caved in and acted like god!  He had NO right to object that trade, and it will go down as his Watergate and Waterloo.
Yeah? You mean the one that would have sent New Orleans Lamar Odom (so valuable that the Lakers immediately after gave him away for free to the Mavericks?) The one that would saddle the Hornets franchise with several large long contracts for JAG (just-a-guy) players? The one that had New Orleans trading an All-NBA player for a player who was a bust everywhere but LA?

Sorry but Demps did not obey his instructions to get young players and draft picks. Stern has every right to act as the owner (which he represents) in this trade and shoot it down. It was not a Watergate as there was no cover-up and no crime committed. It was also not a Waterloo as Stern is not now living in exile and, in fact, has been vindicated by the season's first half and the demise of Odom. Stern answers to 29 men who own the franchises. He does not answer to Laker fans, media wonks or whining general managers. Deal with it as it will not in any way hurt his legacy.



Since: Dec 7, 2011
Posted on: March 2, 2012 9:59 pm
 

Friday 5 with KB: Trade season approaches

t some players on your team that want to play for you. all the owner are billionairs, so what if you lose a few bucks?



Since: Nov 12, 2006
Posted on: March 2, 2012 8:29 pm
 

Friday 5 with KB: Trade season approaches

Stern did the only thing he could with regard to the Chris Paul trade proposal.  The owners of his team didn't want the deal and told him.  His role is nothing more than an "executor of the estate" type of position.  Since all of the NBA owners actually own the team, they absolutely get to decide if they want the trade to go through.  It sucks the for the GM who engineered the trade only because, like many NBA teams, the ownership retained veto power.  It just should have been vetoed before it was made public.



Since: Apr 4, 2010
Posted on: March 2, 2012 8:15 pm
 

Friday 5 with KB: Trade season approaches

Stern's legacy has already been tarnished and will remain tarnished!!  Fans will never forget the Chris Paul debacle, and how he caved in and acted like god!  He had NO right to object that trade, and it will go down as his Watergate and Waterloo.  He will never be seen in a positive light, if he ever was before? The negative effects have rippled through this entire season, and have cost the Lakers a championship, most likely.  He should have been replaced immediately, but small markets don't want big market teams to win.  Then, they will cry when they are not getting their share of the luxury tax these teams pay.  You cannot have it both ways!!


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com