Play Fantasy Use your Fantasy skills to win Cash Prizes. Join or start a league today. Play Now
Blog Entry

Big East has one more week to justify existence

Posted on: September 20, 2010 7:26 pm
 

Posted by Adam Jacobi

The Big East is an automatic BCS-qualifying conference, and as one of the six "power" conference, they are afforded a certain amount of respect. Thus, we owe it to the conference and its members to begin this entry with a compliment. So here it goes: The Big East is three games over .500 against all competition this year.

And that's about it. Because even that lackluster 12-9 record among the eight Big East teams is misleading. For one, every single team is 1-0 against FCS competition. So, good news, Big East: if the conference as a whole were to be relegated tomorrow (unlikely as that may be), they'd be very good all of a sudden. Against the FBS, though, not so much; the Big East is 4-9 overall, which includes a 3-3 record against teams that aren't even in automatic-qualifier conferences. For example, Connecticut lost to Temple last week. By 14 points.

That brings us to the meat of the Big East's resume, and that's play against quality competition. It almost couldn't possibly be worse. The conference is 1-8 against BCS conference teams. Only West Virginia -- who beat a truly miserable Maryland team last Saturday -- has such a win under its belt. That, friends, is poor performance nonpareil.

If that's all going to change in the Big East's favor at all this season, it's going to have to be this weekend; Miami visits Pitt on Thursday, Oklahoma travels to Cincinnati, West Virginia is at LSU, and Rutgers hosts North Carolina. Four difficult -- but winnable -- games against high-profile competition. Among the four listed games, WhatIfSports.com only gives Pitt better than even odds to come away with a victory, so don't be terribly surprised if the conference can't break even against its "real" competition this weekend.

If there's one saving grace to all of this, it's that a conference is usually judged by its highest achievers. The SEC has always been able to rest its laurels on the members who would run through the conference undefeated, for example, because those teams almost always win their national championship games that await. Nobody would demean a conference that could produce a 14-0 Alabama team if that Crimson Tide runs through 14-0 Texas as happened last year, after all. So, West Virginia now has a similar opportunity. While we're not positive that even an undefeated Mountaineers team is guaranteed a BCS Championship berth, they will certainly face high competition during bowl season when that time comes (even if they drop a game between now and then). Win that matchup, and people will pay less and less attention to the cupcakes littering the Mountaineers' conference path.

Comments

Since: Jun 4, 2008
Posted on: September 20, 2010 10:48 pm
 

Big East has one more week to justify existence

  Yes Sir, changes should be brewing in the B.C.S. structure. As of right now the W.A.C. with Boise, Fresno State, and Nevada are a better conference than the lowly Big East, if we are just strictly talking football. Even the Mountain West, starting next year with Utah and B.Y.U. bolting, both T.C.U. and Boise alone would make that a better conference than the Big East. I still believe that the W.A.C. and the Mountain West should form a 16 team conference and have a conference title game. This is a terrible injustice that is being heaved upon the have nots. Though I still believe that Boise is not deserved of a number 3 ranking, they have shown that they are a top 10 team, the best team west of the Rockies. Nevada just pasted Cal, and Fresno beat up on Cincin. who managed to get to a B.C.S. bowl last year. If Boise was in the Mountain West this year, how could anyone deny the conference a B.C.S. bid? How many teams does the A.C.C. or the Big East have in the top 10?


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com