Blog Entry

Big Ten struggling with division names

Posted on: October 29, 2010 2:16 pm
Edited on: November 13, 2010 6:09 pm
 
Posted by Tom Fornelli

When it comes to conference expansion, just about everything has been moving along quicker than anticipated in the Big Ten.  Jim Delany originally said that the process would take 12 to 18 months, yet here we are, less than 12 months later, and the conference has already added Nebraska and figured out the new divisions, and where the conference championship game is going to be played.

Yet, somehow, it seems that the part that really should be the easiest, naming the two new divisions, is going to miss a self-imposed deadline.  When the divisions were announced, Delany said that they would have names no later than December 1.  Well, it's nearly November now, and Delany is saying that he might be off on that by two months.

"I could be off by 60 days. I think it's going really slow," said Delany, speaking at Thursday's Big Ten Basketball Media Day. "Why? Because we're trying to get to the logo, and that's going slow. Then we're getting lots and lots of good selections that we're not coalescing very well. So, I think that there's absolutely -- other than missing my deadline by a day or 60 days -- there's really no compelling reason to rush until we get my comfort level."

Seriously?  It's going to take another three months to come up with a couple of divisional names?  I can come up with some in the next 30 seconds.

Great Lakes and Plains.

Bo and Woody.

Or, how about this one, and it might be pretty crazy, EAST AND WEST.

Wow, I just blew your mind, didn't I, Delany?  Yes, I know that the divisions aren't exactly aligned geographically, but what the hell does that matter?  This is a conference with 12 teams that insists on calling itself the Big Ten, after all.  They're just division names, they don't actually mean anything.


Comments

Since: Oct 27, 2009
Posted on: October 30, 2010 2:47 pm
 

Big Ten struggling with division names

Lol. I could hear the emotion in putting "East and West" in caps. Lol! But how about this.
Division 1: John L. Griffith Division or Griffith Division
Mayor John L. Griffith was the first commissioner of the Big Ten. By naming a division after him, you show that the Big Ten still has a sense of tradition and history.
Division 2: Jim Delany Division or Delany Division
Without Jim Delany, then none of this would be in discussion. After all, he founded the modern Big Ten as we know it, so give it to him. How could anybody say no?



Since: Sep 20, 2009
Posted on: October 29, 2010 11:00 pm
 

Big Ten struggling with division names

I agree call divisions whatever heck look at the ACC Altantic and the Coastal means nothing at all. If you want a issue to talk about how about a name swap with the BIG 12  works out well for all right?  I must be the only one who thinks a 12 team BIG TEN and a ten team BIG 12 is stupid



Since: Mar 1, 2009
Posted on: October 29, 2010 7:22 pm
 

Big Ten struggling with division names

Delany and his staff are still counting the number of teams in each division. Give them time, this arithmetic business is pretty tough. Late word from one of my sources tells me the conference has settled on Big Five and Big Seven divisions because both divisions have six teams.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com