Play Fantasy The Most Award Winning Fantasy game with real time scoring, top expert analysis, custom settings, and more. Play Now
Blog Entry

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

Posted on: January 5, 2011 2:40 am
 
Posted by Jerry Hinnen

Ohio State builds a 31-13 second-half lead and -- despite a safety, lost fumble, and blocked punt, all in the fourth quarter -- holds off a furious Arkansas rally to win a classic, 31-26.

OHIO STATE

Offense: Terrelle Pryor may never be remembered as the dominant force-of-nature his raw talent suggests he can be, but it won't be for his bowl performances. The Sugar Bowl MVP racked up 336 yards-from-scrimmage (221 passing, 115 rushing), accounted for two touchdowns without committing a turnover, and was sensational on third down, converting multiple hopeless-looking situations into third downs with his scrambling.

Add Pryor's night to big ones from Dane Sanzenbacher (only three receptions but two touchdowns, one on a fumble recovery), Boom Herron (87 yards, one score), and the Buckeye offensive line (5.0 yards-per-carry, no sacks allowed vs. the nation's 12th-ranked pass rush) and it's easy to see how the Buckeyes raced out to a 28-7 first-half lead. They had a much rougher second half -- only 110 yards of offense after 336 at halftime, and Herron's safety and fumble handed Arkansas two gift-wrapped opportunities -- but they also never made the killer mistake to let the Hogs all the way back. GRADE: B+

Defense: Start with Cameron Heyward, a night-long nightmare for the Hog offensive line who for all of Pryor's brilliance should have been the game MVP. Then there's the four sacks, the mediocre 5.9 yards allowed per pass play (despite the loss of top corner Chimdi Chekwa to a broken hand early in the game), and the one touchdown allowed over the course of Arkansas's final 12 possessions.

But most of all, there's this: with the Hogs within one possession following the Herron safety, their final four drives started at the 50-yard line, the Arkansas 44, the Ohio State 48, and the OSU 18. Total results of those drives? 39 yards, three points, two punts, and one backbreaking turnover. There's clutch defense, and then there's that. GRADE: A-

Coaching:
A bizarre first-half onsides kick attempt aside, Jim Tressel and his staff pushed the right buttons, kept the defense together in the face of multiple injuries, and had his team plenty ready to play on both sides of the ball. You beat a 10-win SEC team in the Sugar Bowl, you've done a lot of things right, GRADE: A-

ARKANSAS

Offense:
The Hogs finished with an impressive 402 yards against the No. 2 defense in the country, but no one's going to remember that. They'll remember the devastating parade of drops from the Hog receivers (six in all, half of them from particularly-butterfingered wideout Joe Adams) , the Swiss cheese pass protection, the wasted opportunity after wasted opportunity down the stretch, and finally the one game-icing mistake from Ryan Mallett. There's a lot to say for an offense that puts up those kinds of yards (including a quiet 139 yards rushing for Knile Davis, if there can be such a thing) and even the 26 points against a defense as stout as the Buckeyes, but as many chances as the Hog defense and special teams gave Bobby Petrino's favorite unit, there's also little question they should have found a way to finish the comeback. GRADE: C-

Defense:
For most of the first half, the Hogs looked like the rock-bottom group from 2009 rather than the much-improved outfit we saw in 2010, missing tackles left and right (Pryor is one thing, but when Sanzenbacher is juking his way out of tight spots, you've got issues) and leaving massive gaps both up front and in the secondary. 336 first-half yards to an attack as generally non-explosive as the Buckeyes' (not to mention the 28 points) pretty much says it all.

To their credit, the Hogs responded with a huge second half, giving up just one net point after yielding one field goal and scoring a safety of their own. But maybe the offense could have gotten all the way out of the hole if it hadn't been quite so deep to begin with. GRADE: B-

Coaching:
Defensive coordinator Willy Robinson deserves some kudos for his halftime adjustments and Petrino a handful for keeping his team's head in the game down big, but Petrino made some curious play calls (repeatedly asking for draws or screens on third-and-long when his quarterback possesses the strongest arm in the college game) and could have been more aggressive looking for six points late in the game rather than settling for three. Still, the Hogs' biggest problems -- his line's terrible play, the wretched drops -- were more player execution problems than coaching issues. We think. GRADE: B

FINAL GRADE:
Games simply don't get a whole lot more dramatic than this one, with the outcome seemingly riding on each and every play in the fourth quarter and momentum swinging back and forth like the needle of a metronome. If this was our appetizer for the BCS national title game, we can't wait for the main course. GRADE: A

 

Comments

Since: Aug 20, 2006
Posted on: January 5, 2011 9:23 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl


First as a Razorbacker, I'd like to say congrats to the Buckeye fans.  However, and I know I'm going to sound like sour grapes, but as pointed out in the grades, this was more of an Arkansas loss than it was an OSU win.  But it was an exciting game till the end.

Thanks for the showing some class and congratulating the opposing team. I'd like to point out that both teams made mistakes, but Arkansas made the more critical ones.  More penalties, dropped passes and one huge turnover, not to mention the poor tackling in the first half.

The first half belonged to Ohio State and the second half to Arkansas with the difference being the Ohio State defense holding the hogs to 3 pts in those last four possessions and the interception at the end. You have to give credit for those stops. Arkansas scored more points against Auburn than they did Ohio State.

Bottom line is OSU's offense gained more yards, had fewer penalties, no turnovers, allowed no sacks and made the big plays. On defense OSU had 4 sacks, held Mallett to his lowest completion rate of the season, picked off a pass and came up with big stops all game.

The Buckeyes won the game, so you can choose to look at it like that, or you can choose to say Arkansas lost the game, but the team that executes better is usually the team that wins. Execution is the key to winning and Ohio State won because they executed better than Arkansas.

Put these two teams together again next week and Arkansas may win, but for sure, today the Arkansas players are thinking about what might have been if they had only executed a little better.




Since: Nov 6, 2006
Posted on: January 5, 2011 9:13 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

WAC:  Why let the comments bother you?  It's called the most BCS appearances in BCS history, along witha 5-3 record.  They came out and whipped an SEC team in the first half, and did what they had to do to hang on in the second.  They showed the nation they had the speed to hang with the SEC, and for much of the second half they had several second and third string defensive players in there and Arkansas still couldn't capitalize!



Since: Nov 6, 2006
Posted on: January 5, 2011 9:06 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

mikeyfan:  Not really.  It was more like an OSU first half win, and an Arkansas second half win.  The difference was that OSU won the first half more convincingly.  They came out with a different game plan in the second half because of their big lead.  It almost cost them, but it didn't.




Since: Sep 26, 2010
Posted on: January 5, 2011 8:53 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

It's a shame I have to see all these "OSU didn't win, Arkansas lost" comments.

I can assure you that had my Buckeyes lost, I wouldn't use such a cliche comment to explain it away.

Hats off to Arkansas.  You almost came back.  I've watched alot of OSU football and I can't tell you how many close games I've seen ended by a last minute pick.

To Buckeye fans...... anyone get shades of Phillip Rivers at NC State taking us to double overtime back in 2002?  I did.  Ryan Malette looks NFL ready...... and I'm not just saying that because the announcers mentioned that every time he scratched his butt.



Since: Sep 6, 2009
Posted on: January 5, 2011 8:39 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

So, how many tattoos will this game give the players from Tattoo U?

Also, knew that Arkansas would lay an egg in this game.  Someone forgot to tell the Arkansas receivers when the game started.




Since: Sep 6, 2009
Posted on: January 5, 2011 8:38 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

So, how many tattoos will this game give the players from Tattoo U?

Also, knew that Arkansas would lay an egg in this game.  Someone forgot to tell the Arkansas receivers when the game started.




Since: Dec 24, 2010
Posted on: January 5, 2011 7:39 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

First off I would like to congratulate both teams on a GREAT game. Secondly, if Arkansas' receivers had concentrated on catching the ball instead of jawing all the time, they probably would have won.



Since: Nov 23, 2009
Posted on: January 5, 2011 7:36 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

It is called Tressel Ball, Shut down with the lead and hang on until the end.   Drives me crazy but I can't dispute his success and it probably should have backfired last night.  Everyone focuses on the two big losses in the NC games but Tress otherwise has a great post season record.   The "safety" was one of the worst calls of the Bowl season.



Since: Aug 15, 2006
Posted on: January 5, 2011 7:20 am
 

Bowl Grades: Sugar Bowl

First as a Razorbacker, I'd like to say congrats to the Buckeye fans.  However, and I know I'm going to sound like sour grapes, but as pointed out in the grades, this was more of an Arkansas loss than it was an OSU win.  But it was an exciting game till the end.



The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com