Blog Entry

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

Posted on: January 14, 2011 9:21 pm
Edited on: January 16, 2011 3:20 pm
 
Posted by Adam Jacobi

Earlier today, our own Dennis Dodd posted his pre-preseason Top 25 for the 2011 college football season. We here at the College Football Blog wouldn't dare disagree with our esteemed colleague's opinions ... but every year there's teams that vastly exceed the expectations of even the wisest prognosticators (like, say, Auburn in 2010) and some that disappoint despite some seemingly major advantages (like, say, Iowa in 2010).

So earlier today we named five that are in his Top 25 that might slip out or could otherwise disappoint, and right now we'll name five more teams we think can crack that Top 25 next season. Without further ado (and in no particular order):

1. Baylor - The good news for Baylor: dynamic quarterback Robert Griffin III is back along with most of the offense, and while he loses starting tailback Jay Finley to graduation, Finley's backups Terrance Ganaway and Jarred Salubi provide an intriguing balance of power and speed -- they both return. In addition, RG3 gets his top five receivers back (all of whom caught at least 40 passes this year), and three-year starting lineman Philip Baker will be the anchor at center for a mostly intact offensive line. Yes, Baylor still looks wretched at times on defense (53 points to Oklahoma and 55 to Oklahoma State aren't exactly solid efforts), so there's no telling whether the Bears' losses on that side of the ball are addition by subtraction or not, but one thing's for sure: there'll be points put up in Waco in 2011.

2. Illinois - This spot would likely go to fellow "Leader" Penn State if it weren't for the fact that PSU's replacing Evan Royster, two leading receivers, its two best offensive linemen, and there's really no telling who's starting at QB in 2011. Oh, and most of the Penn State defense -- including two of three starting LBs -- is graduating too. Contrast that with Illinois , who found a star quarterback in freshman Nathan Scheelhaase this year and returns four of five starting offensive linemen. The Illini won't miss early declarant Mikel LeShoure much with Jason Ford (who's basically a human truck) waiting to take over at tailback. The defense will definitely miss Martez Wilson and Corey Liuget on the interior, on the other hand; those guys were anchors of a stout rushing defense and their backups are unremarkable. Still, Illinois' 2011 schedule looks primed for some upsets, and nine wins is hardly out of the question. If Wilson and Liuget were returning, Illinois would probably be in Dodd's Top 25, but it's not as if no borderline-Top 25 team has ever exceeded expectations after losing two juniors to the NFL.

3. Utah - Everything's going to come crashing down once Utah joins a "real" conference, right? Maybe not. If QB Jordan Wynn recovers from December shoulder surgery in time for the season (which he should, but six months of rehab can turn into nine without the patient doing anything wrong), he'll be a third-year starter with a reasonable set of returning players. Senior wideout/returner Shaky Smithson is sure to be missed, but this is college football; so it goes. And while Utah's schedule looks daunting, it really could be worse; the Utes miss both Oregon and Stanford in inter-divisional play, and neither BYU nor Pitt should be as tough of matchups as they'd have been over the past couple years. In addition, the schedule's pretty top-heavy, and it's easily possible that Utah wins at least five of six down the stretch. Head coach Kyle Whittingham keeps proving predictions wrong by not bolting for a paycheck elsewhere, and now he's got a chance to lead his Utes into battle in a real conference and destroy the "mid-major" label that's been dogging the program -- even through multiple BCS bowl wins! -- once and for all.

4. Oregon State - Meanwhile, in the Pac-12 North, the Oregon State Beavers have a chance to make noise. Yes, Oregon and Stanford are the class of the division and should remain so for the near future, but don't sleep on the passing skills of QB Ryan Katz , especially now that he'll have his first full season as a starter under his belt. With the game slowing down for him and with Markus Wheaton and James Rodgers both returning at WR (to say nothing of Joe Halahuni coming back at TE), Katz should be able to more effectively use his NFL-caliber arm to put some points up in Corvallis. The offense will miss Jacquizz Rodgers desperately, and while deserved, his jump to the NFL will likely cost the Beavers a win or two. So while the defense struggled in 2010 and stands to lose several seniors, it may not matter in a Pac-12 with several struggling offenses and an OSU attack that should set 30+ points per game as a goal. Scheduling a road date at Wisconsin might not have been the wisest idea, though. Still, look for a push from Oregon State to hit that eight-win mark, which against a schedule like this could mean a spot in the Top 25 when it's all said and done.

5. Tennessee - Dodd ranks eight SEC teams in his Top 25 (26, really, but whatever). We're not sure all will end up ranked at the end of the 2011 season, but one thing seems clear: of the four teams he left out -- Kentucky , Ole Miss , Tennessee , and Vanderbilt -- Tennessee's the closest thing to a contender of the four. No, the SEC East shouldn't spend its entire season on fire like last year, where South Carolina took the division trophy in a five-loss season, but Florida 's going to be experiencing major upheaval and Georgia will be missing A.J. Green (again). With Tyler Bray coming off a successful freshman campaign and returning starting RB Tauren Poole and deep threat wideout Justin Hunter , we could see the Vols make some noise. On defense, the only major loss is leading tackler Nick Reveiz ; Herman Lathers made strides along with the rest of the defense down the stretch, and the secondary returns intact. If there's ever a time to make a run in the East, it's -- well, okay, it was 2010. 2011's not a bad opportunity for the Vols either, though.



Comments

Since: Mar 22, 2008
Posted on: January 16, 2011 9:49 am
 

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

this is a joke right??   
wasnt illinois SUPPOSED to be good for like the 3rd year in a row??  picking ANY team from the big 12 is a joketennessee??  why not pick vanderbilt or ole miss next
oregon state??
the fact you picked illinois alone with the zooker as their idiot head coach makes this whole article look like a lunatic wrote it.
you couldnt have picked 5 more laughable teams than this
who hires these idiots to write for cbs??
did you watch ANY football this year?



Since: Jan 21, 2010
Posted on: January 16, 2011 9:41 am
 

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

And meanwhile, Kansas is going to sink deeper into the Big 12 basement, thanks to Mr. Nice Guy Turner Gill. Yell



Since: Nov 19, 2006
Posted on: January 16, 2011 9:12 am
 

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

I do not see Oregon State as a potential sleeper next season.  They are picked by most to fnish 3rd in the Pac 12 North, and even minus Jacquizz Rodgers, that is where they will probably end up.  They go to Wisconsin on week 2, and host BYU, so their non-con schedule is not quite as hard as last season, but certainly not soft.  With no USC on the schedule though, Oregon State should be able to win 6+ games and return to a bowl.

Tennessee has nowheres to go but up, however the reason for that is the fact that they scheduled four patsies at home for non-con games.  They still will lose all three of their games against the SEC West teams ('Bama, LSU, and Arkansas) and must travel to Florida, a perinneal loss to begin with.  Home games against Georgia and South Carolina willmost likely determine if this team is another 6-6 team or an 8-4 team.

Utah certainly has a chance to surprise people in a wide open Pac 12 South.  As mentioned, skipping Oregon and Stanford is huge.  Their schedule still is not the easiest, going to Pitt and BYU, after playing the first PAc 12 game in history at USC.  Still, Utah should be in the thick of things in the Pac 10 South, especially if USC remains on bowl probation.



Since: Dec 1, 2007
Posted on: January 16, 2011 8:59 am
 

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

Aaron Murray at Georgia is probably the best returning quarterback in the SEC and he will only be a sophomore.  Jarvis Jones is an absolute monster defensive player that had to sit out last year after transferring from Southern Cal.  Richard Samuel was rated the best linebacker in the country a few years ago and he will be plugged in as well.  Georgia is likely to land 5-star running back Isaiah Crowell and, voila, the Dawgs are back.  I would say that overlooking Georgia would be a mistake.


diffendale
Since: Jan 2, 2010
Posted on: January 16, 2011 6:37 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Feb 11, 2009
Posted on: January 16, 2011 5:58 am
 

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

Well, we should probably mention that last season, Mr. Jacobi, that at the beginning of last season, your esteemed colleague, Dennins Dodd, had Ron Zook on his list those coaches who were on the spot.   I don't see Illinois suffers from the same problem that has plagued Michigan, a sometimes listless defense at best.  Don't look for Illinois to do anything spectacular until they cure that ill.



Since: Dec 2, 2007
Posted on: January 16, 2011 2:17 am
 

5 Up: Potential 2011 sleeper teams

Tennessee's the closest thing to a contender of the four.
And I'd even say that they may be a contender for Florida and SC for the SEC east.  After all it is their turn on the SEC merry-go-round and they have been shafted in games the past couple of years with questionable calls and non-calls, so it's probably their turn.  Auburn got their NC that some people foolishly thought they deserved that was vacated by USC in 2004 by paying Cam--until it's taken too--so now it should finally be Tennessee's turn.  Green leaving Georgia likely precludes them getting their turn and Kentucky.....well it's not basketball.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com