Blog Entry

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

Posted on: January 7, 2011 8:24 pm
 
Posted by MATT JONES

The NCAA on Friday reaffirmed its previous ruling that Enes Kanter will never step foot on a basketball court for Kentucky.  The decision was not particularly surprising, as the organization had three times previously ruled against Kanter and seemed for some time to be dead set on drawing an Enes line in the sand, with virtually all other NCAA athletes on one side and Kanter standing on the other.  A myriad of conspiracy theories can be trumped up for the decision, ranging from the NCAA's general dislike of Calipari to its President standing up for his former employer, the University of Washington, where Kanter was committed before flipping and heading to Kentucky. But the simple fact is that a conspiracy theory is not needed for the NCAA to act irrationally.  In fact at this point, a lack of coherent reasoning and consistency seems ingrained in the core fabric of the organization.

The facts of the Enes Kanter situation have always been conceded.  Kanter played in Turkey for two seasons and was paid a sum of money between the ages of 16-17 to be part of the professional club, Fenerbache.  For many national sportswriters and college coaches, for whom nuance and shades of grey are as rare as a dodo bird, that has settled the issue.  However, the NCAA has created a system in recent years to attempt to allow these so-called "professionals" the ability to play college basketball in America.  Up until this point, the NCAA has recognized that the European youth system is different than that of America, with the notion of popular amateur athletics on the University level virtually non-existent.  The best talent of Europe signs early with a professional club and is trained in the equivalent of a basketball academy, with money paid for their training and expenses.  The NCAA has allowed these players to come to the United States and even last year, repealed the antiquated rule that forced them to sit out an equal number of college games to the ones they played for the professional team.

In Kanter's case however, the NCAA deemed $33,000 of payment given to Enes's father to be above what was a "necessary and actual expense."  To the NCAA, that money represented a salary, given because Kanter was a professional.  But of course, that conclusion doesn't pass the smell test.  Does anyone honestly believe that a player would be deemed a professional, while playing for one of the richest clubs in Europe, in one of the most expensive cities in the world (Istanbul) and would only accept $16,500 a year in the process? If Kanter and his club truly considered him to be a professional, why would he have been paid such a small amount?  Kanter's father has insisted that over $20,000 of that money was used for educational expenses, which if true, means that a little over $10,000 over the course of two years made Kanter a professional in the eyes of him and his club.  

While that decision might seem a bit irrational, viewed in the abstract, it could at least be defended.  But of course, the NCAA does not operate in a vacuum, and over the course of the last three months has issued three high-profile decisions allowing three high-profile players to compete despite amateurism violations.  Each could be defended with some tenuous logic when released, but when viewed together with the Kanter decision, no consistent theme can be found.

Take Kansas Freshman Josh Selby. He was suspended for nine games and required to pay over $5700 to a charity of his choice due to his acceptance of that amount of improper benefits while in high school.  Under NCAA rules, Selby was no longer an amateur.  But the NCAA looked at the case and somehow determined that this violation could be redeemed if the money was simply paid back.  How is the excess $5700 in expenses different than Kanter's $33,000?  Is it just that the total is too large?  Maybe so, but there is nothing in the NCAA rule book that says the amount makes a difference.  Is the difference that the money was paid by a European club rather than a hustling street agent?  Maybe so, but there is nothing in the NCAA rulebook that says where the illegal money comes from should make a difference.  The difference is manufactured, but never explained by the NCAA.

Take Heisman Trophy winner Cam Newton.  His father admittedly asked for $180,000 in improper benefits from Mississippi State, but the NCAA allowed Newton to play because it deemed that it could not be proven that his son knew about the money.  Ok fair enough.  In a vacuum that makes sense.  But Kanter also claims to not have known about the money taken by his father in excess of the "actual and necessary" expenses.  The NCAA claims that the fact money was taken is different than if money was simply asked for by the parent. However that difference is not based on any rule in the NCAA Rule book and the logic behind both cases (the son should not be punished for the sins of the father) applies to both equally.  So why is Newton, who one has to strain the laws of credibility to believe didn't know his father was on the take, playing and Kanter, who likely didn't do the expense budget and probably didn't know the amount his father took, ineligible?  Its hard to comprehend.

Or take the Ohio State five.  All five broke NCAA rules when they sold or exchanged NCAA memorabilia that was given to them for various team accomplishments.  All broke the rules and violated the amateurism standard.  But, the NCAA allowed them to miss only five games and even went further by delaying the punishment because the group was supposedly unaware of the rule they were breaking.  I am certain that 16 year-old Enes Kanter in Turkey had no clue what the NCAA rules were when he took the money from Fenerbache, so why doesn't the "I didnt know" apply to him?  Is it because he has no BCS Sugar Bowl upcoming?

The simplistic way to look at the Kanter situation is also the easiest.  He played for a professional team, so he was a "pro", end of story. But, when one looks beyond the surface level, those simplistic distinctions breakdown and are shown to be based on nothing in the NCAA rule book or from any logical consistency.  Josh Selby, Cam Newton, the Ohio State Five and Enes Kanter all broke NCAA rules.  All of them should have been ruled ineligible based upon a strict reading of the NCAA rules.  But in three of the cases, the NCAA decided that the rules needed bending and rendered punishments that allowed for "flexibility."  In the Kanter case, the rules were read strictly.  What explains the difference?  Well nothing in the NCAA rule book or any logical framework does, so all we are left with is one conclusion.  The only thing certain about the NCAA's decision making process is that it will be consistently inconsistent


Comments

Since: Feb 21, 2010
Posted on: January 9, 2011 9:55 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

"your a UK homer plain and simple."
You're > your 



Since: Feb 21, 2010
Posted on: January 9, 2011 9:54 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

Is this English?  And Kentucky fans are uneducated?  Wow.



Since: Jan 1, 2011
Posted on: January 9, 2011 9:53 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

I have been a UK fan for decades. It never fails to amaze me how juvenile some UL fans are when it comes to explaining how their team seems to suck when it comes to playing UK.  Get used to it. You have a fair basketball history and tradition. Get to know you inner self. Try to bone up on how to write sarcasm. You have some potential. It is sometimes difficult to tell if you're a UL or Ohio State fan. The Buckeyes are finally crawling out of that hole the SEC put them in for years. You should know that feeling, trying to crawl out of a hole and bring the winning way back to UL and Rick. Rick and UL need some ego building. Right-on.




Since: Jan 7, 2011
Posted on: January 9, 2011 8:41 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

MATTS BELOVED MILDCATS WOULD HAVE HAD ANOTHER LOSS IN THERE COULMN IF LOUISVILLE WOULD HAVE BEEN HEATHY INSTEAD OF SHORTHANDED....HOWEVER THE MILDCAT FANS DONT SEE IT THAT WAY........GO BUCKEYES



Since: Jul 10, 2009
Posted on: January 9, 2011 2:53 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

your a UK homer plain and simple



Since: Aug 29, 2006
Posted on: January 9, 2011 2:26 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

Very well written and argued Matt, as always.

The NCAA has essentially lost its effectiveness. It is an arbitrary, agenda-driven, inconsistently-acting collection of administrators that has no business ruling that this young man must miss the experience of playing college basketball. The NCAA spends more time picking fly crap out of the pepper in Lexington, Kentucky than the rest of the nation combinded. If Kanter were enrolled at Duke right now the NCAA would be dusting off its knee caps and wiping the evidence off its chin in its attempts to please Coach K's wishes to play him.......in effect they did exactly that with Duke and Corey Maggette a few years back.

There is probably only one place of the planet this kid gets blackballed......Kentucky.  Sorry Enes, you should have stayed with the Univ of Washington.....had you done so you'd be pushing Sullinger for Freshman Big Man of the Year about now......instead, you are on the biggest stage in all of college sports, but only as a stagehand, not an actor........




Since: Nov 28, 2007
Posted on: January 9, 2011 2:02 pm
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

I agree very well said Matt. Excellent article, now prepare to be blasted away at since that seems to be the order of things for anyone that shows any support for the University of Kentucky or John Calipari on this site.

Kentucky cheats/John Calipari cheats/Kentucky fans cheat being chanted or sung like a incantation or mantra.



Since: Dec 30, 2010
Posted on: January 9, 2011 10:45 am
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

This is the biggest crock of shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh  
   it!  I am serious, this is just gotten to the point of ABSURD!  The NCAA acts in its own interest and this is just the latest in a recent string of decisions by them.  The whole USC thing, people heard whispers for a long time.  Even the Dirty Sanchez got into some trouble there.  The OSU 5 BS, Auburn QB maybe had some extra cash, not to mention his gangsta mentality in Gainesville.  The sanctions against Michigan, Memphis basketball, UConn mens program.  I mean there is some shady azz stuff going in in college sports and it seems the NCAA is always not one step, but ten steps behind.  I mean everyone knew Bush and company were living the life out in Cali!  But the NCAA turned an eye to all this?  WHY!!!!  Cause at the time, look at how much the USC football progam generated $$$$$$$$$$  I mean, hell some of their games could be argued the greatest college games ever played ever watched!!!!  But the NCAA allowed that team to operate!

Now, my point is, you see a common ground here..  All shaddy like activities..

All this kid is guilty of is being born outside of the USA!  He is punished for living in a country that probably doesnt even have a legitimate high school basketball association!  So a kid who is clearly gifted like himself, gets found by teams, clubs, or basketball schools.  This is how it operates in all sports, outside of the USA.  There is sport academies.  SO he goes to one of the best teams, learns from the best coaches, practices against the best players, improves as a ball player, then also seeking to further educate himself all the while.  What what the total money received?  35k!!!  This is a joke!  The parents are well off, educated, good careers!  They were simply trying to make sure their child had the best chance to succeed!  Now is there anything dirty about this kid?  Not that I can find, except one thing, that fact he is now tied to John Calipari, who in the past stops has been punished!  How he is allowed to coach in NCAA is beyond me!  But the fact is here, the NCAA is clearly not anywhere capable of handling the grand scheme of college athletics.  Not this investigative, judiciary side..   Cause there is no consistency, there is not common ground.  You let Auburn QB$ to play, the OSU 5$ to play, but not this kid.  It is sad, I would like to watch a skilled big man play against the college kids, especially since he is a kid himself.  Like the article mentions, it is sad, some crusty azz old men get to decide the fate of an 18 year of foriegn basketball player!  NCAA is about real as a $3 bill!




Since: Dec 21, 2010
Posted on: January 9, 2011 8:51 am
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

maybe you haven't figured this out. calipari is an arrogant aloof northeastern oportunist. he is un-liked by every one in the country except uk and it's fanbase. funny thing is before uk hired him he was despised by them also. the guy is a proven cheater. i know, i know, he was not connected to anything, but if fact ,yes he was.what his schools have been punished for is only the tip of the iceberg. this is the NCAA's way of warning schools to clean up their messes. with the proven history of uk fans and boosters this will lead to major problems for the school. he has already dodged the bullet Wall and his agent and with the scholar-athlete known as eric bledsoe.



Since: Aug 18, 2006
Posted on: January 9, 2011 12:16 am
 

NCAA: The No Consistency Athletic Association

Barefoot,

Get a life dude is that really the one thing you picked out of this article was one misuse of than?


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com