Blog Entry

Canucks' Torres avoids suspension for big hit

Posted on: April 18, 2011 1:59 pm
Edited on: April 18, 2011 6:26 pm
 
A few feet to his right or left was all that separated Vancouver Canucks forward Raffi Torres from another suspension for a blindside hit.
 
Torres caught an unsuspecting Chicago Blackhawks defenseman Brent Seabrook up high during the second period, a collision that drew an interference minor. But the NHL decided to take no action on Monday and league disciplinarian Colin Campbell explained in a statement why that was: 
"When Rule 48 (Illegal Check to the Head) was unanimously adopted by the General Managers in March 2010, there was no intention to make this type of shoulder hit to the head illegal. In fact, at that time, we distributed a video to all players and teams that showed a similar hit on a defenseman by an attacking forward coming from the opposite direction behind the net and stated that this is a 'legal play'.

"This hit meets none of the criteria that would subject Torres to supplemental discipline, including an application of Rule 48: he did not charge his opponent or leave his feet to deliver this check. He did not deliver an elbow or extended forearm and this hit was not 'late'."

Seabrook, for one, said Monday there should have been another ban in the offing, according to CSN Chicago's Tracey Myers:
Asked if he was surprised Torres didn’t get a suspension on the hit, Seabrook said, “yep.”

“With his history I think that hit deserves a suspension. Not going to complain about that. It’s a fast game. Things happen quickly. You have a split second to make a decision. He wasn’t trying to hit me in the head but at the same time if they’re not going to suspend somebody for that I just don’t understand that.”

“I think he kept his elbow in but he hit the head first,” Seabrook continued. “As far as I’m concerned that’s the only thing I felt. The rest of my body’s feeling the rest of it today. Whether or not he was targeting (my head) he made contact with the head first.”

Here’s a look at the hit. Seabrook was knocked out of the game briefly after another check by Torres later in the period of the Canucks’ 3-2 victory over the ‘Hawks, although Seabrook returned for the third. The Canucks lead the series, 3-0. 

Torres was playing in his first contest since he was suspended four games for a hit on Edmonton Oilers forward Jordan Eberle on April 5.

Blackhawks coach Joel Quennville, according to CSN Chicago, took more issue with the fact his team wasn't given a major penalty for the collision.
“I have no problem with that as far as the league views it. They know the standards, they know the criteria. They do a good job with that. The call on the ice is where we got hurt the most,” coach Joel Quenneville said. “It should’ve been a major penalty because he didn’t touch the puck. Hit like that you could be exposed to severe injuries and that’s the intent of a major call.”

-- A.J. Perez
Comments

Since: Oct 20, 2008
Posted on: April 18, 2011 4:41 pm
 

Report: Raffi Torres avoids suspension

 wrote:

You are a complete moron and probally cant skate if you think the Torres hit was worth a suspension.
I'm sure I can skate better than you, fat boy.

It was a clean hockey hit the puck was there, Seabrook should know better he is an all star defenceman.

The Stoll hit was a susoension clear and simple.  Learn the game
My point was that both hits were targetted hits to the head, when the victim had no chance of defending himself.  Since I actually watched the game, I can tell you that Torres made no attempt to play the puck- he came flying in, looking to make a big hit all the way.  If you watch the video, Torres never even looks at the puck, and actually leaves his feet to make the hit:



a big no-no.  So since I need to "learn the game", please to be educating me and the rest of us on what is a suspendable hit ?!



Since: Apr 9, 2008
Posted on: April 18, 2011 4:29 pm
 

Report: Raffi Torres avoids suspension

It was a clean hockey hit the puck was there, Seabrook should know better he is an all star defenceman.

The Stoll hit was a susoension clear and simple.  Learn the game


You can say this, and maybe you are even right... but I would bet that in a December game there is a suspension.  I would also hazard that if Matt Cooke made the same hit under the same circumstances there would be suspension.... just my opinion, but I think that the punishments are completely arbitrary



Since: Dec 4, 2006
Posted on: April 18, 2011 4:29 pm
 

Report: Raffi Torres avoids suspension

A year ago it wouldn't be a suspension, but the NHL instituted Rule 48 which makes a blindside hit to the head an offence worthy of suspension.



Since: Apr 9, 2008
Posted on: April 18, 2011 4:24 pm
 

Report: Raffi Torres avoids suspension

I swear Colin Campbell must determine the discipline by stripping nude and rolling chicken bones or something...


I am disturbed that you even came up with this example for how it is determined.... on so many different levels.  I do agree, however, that the punishments are arbitrary at best.



Since: Mar 29, 2007
Posted on: April 18, 2011 4:02 pm
 

Report: Raffi Torres avoids suspension

You are a complete moron and probally cant skate if you think the Torres hit was worth a suspension.
It was a clean hockey hit the puck was there, Seabrook should know better he is an all star defenceman.

The Stoll hit was a susoension clear and simple.  Learn the game



Since: Oct 20, 2008
Posted on: April 18, 2011 3:57 pm
 

Report: Raffi Torres avoids suspension

I knew it!! Stoll gets a suspension for his hit, but Raffi Torres gets nothing for his.  There's so little actual guideline and rules evidenced here, that I swear Colin Campbell must determine the discipline by stripping nude and rolling chicken bones or something...


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com