Blog Entry

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

Posted on: November 10, 2011 1:28 pm
Edited on: November 10, 2011 2:59 pm

By: Adam Gretz

The highest scoring team in the NHL (the Philadelphia Flyers) played a Tampa Bay Lightning team on Wednesday night that featured the most prolific goal-scorer in the league over the past two seasons (Steven Stamkos) and a former MVP (Martin St. Louis). That should result in an exciting game with a lot of goals, scoring chances and back-and-forth play, right? Wrong.

The highlight (or lowlight) of the night, as well as the biggest talking point in the NHL on Thursday morning, is how the game, which Tampa Bay won in overtime, 2-1, had all the excitement of paint drying due to the Lightning's commitment to its 1-3-1 system, and the Flyers' unwillingness to attack it.

If you haven't already seen it, multiple times throughout the game, especially during the first period, the Flyers' defensemen, including Chris Pronger and Braydon Coburn, refused to skate the puck out of their own zone and waited for the Lightning's forecheckers to make the first move.

When that didn't happen, the result was a stalemate unlike any other

And this was a game that was played on national television. That can not be what the NHL wants, and most of the negative reaction has been directed at the Lightning and coach Guy Boucher for playing such a style of hockey.

Versus analyst Mike Milbury, for example, left the set during the second intermission of Wednesday's game in "protest" (though, his night was probably over at that point anyway), while the discussion of whether or not the NHL needs to implement some form of "shot clock" to prevent a team from not advancing the puck the way Philadelphia did has been kicked off.

Depending on your rooting interest you probably have a different idea as to who the winners and losers were in this game. If you're a Lightning fan you're probably happy (and rightfully so) because your team won the game. Flyers fans -- and the Flyers themselves -- seem to be taking great pride in the fact that they embarrassed the Lightning by essentially calling out their style of play and shining some light on how boring the neutral zone trap is (though, we didn't need the Flyers to prove that to us -- we knew that based on watching hockey between 1995 and 2005).

Take, for example, the words of Pronger, via Tim Panaccio of CSNPhilly:
“Would you pay money to see that? I wouldn’t either and that was a [VERSUS] TV game, too. Way to showcase the product. Look at the players they got over there.
“That’s not my job. Maybe Shanny [Brendan Shanahan] should take charge of that, too. I don’t know.
“That is the way they play there all the time, whether it’s us or anybody. If they get down, they go into a two-man forecheck. We were just waiting for them to come in. Force them out of their forecheck or whatever that was. They weren’t forchecking. Their stance, I guess.
“That was their game right there. We were making them look bad. That’s not hockey in my book, but whatever. The league is letting them do it.”
Of course the league is "letting them do it," because there's nothing in the rule book that says a team can't play a certain type of defensive system. And as far as the "making them look bad" is concerned, it should again be pointed out that Tampa Bay did, in fact, win the hockey game, which is still the ultimate goal.

Tampa Bay doesn't pride itself on winning games in style, because if it did, it wouldn't be playing the 1-3-1 to begin with. So it's doubtful the Lightning are going to apologize for the boring manner in which they win games. And they aren't.

"We're sticking to the game plan," said Boucher, via the St. Pete Times. "When we have the puck we're aggressive with it, and when we don't have the puck we dedicate ourselves to being above the puck instead of chasing from behind. It tells me guys are buying in."

Sabres coach Lindy Ruff chimed in on Thursday and according to John Vogl condoned Tampa Bay's style of play, but did add that there has to be an obligation to try and get the puck if the other team has it.

There also has to be an obligation for the team with the puck to move it.

As a hockey fan, of course I would prefer to see a more offensive game that highlights the skill of the players on the ice, so I can't say that I love the way Tampa Bay plays. I certainly respect it, and I respect the way players have obviously bought into Boucher's system, but it is boring. But I also don't want to see anything that would limit their ability to play that style of hockey or restrict a players' on-ice movements, such as the type of "illegal defense" rules the NBA has attempted over the years, mainly because I'm not sure how you enforce it, and also because the referees have enough to worry about without trying to identify what system a team is playing.

I don't blame the Lightning for what took place Wednesday night, and focussing on Tampa Bay seems to overlook the fact that just about every team in the NHL plays some variation of the trap -- it's just that the Lightning's is different from all the others. Still, when the Flyers have the puck the onus is on them to advance it, play the game, and figure out a way to exit their own zone, navigate through the neutral zone and enter the offensive zone. They chose not to do that.

And let's not act like the Lightning and their system, no matter how committed they are to it, are impossible to score against. Last season they allowed 155 goals during 5-on-5 play (when they would have been playing their system). Only 12 teams in the NHL allowed more. So far this season they've allowed 33 goals during 5-on-5 play, which is the fourth most in the NHL (only Ottawa, Carolina and Philadelphia have allowed more).

You can score against them. The only way you're guaranteed to not score against them is if you make no effort.

Photo: Getty Images

For more hockey news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnHockey and @agretz on Twitter.


Since: Nov 18, 2006
Posted on: November 11, 2011 7:47 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

The hypocrissy is incredible. Everyone in the league used to use the trap. Philly used the hell out of the trap against Washington in the 2008 playoffs. Tampa has the 4th most shots on goal against in the league... Philly is old and slow and terrible at dumping and crashing hard. That's not Tampa's fault. No one wants to talk about the 2-2-1 forecheck that the Bolts plays if there is any chance of actually getting the puck. They don't go into the 1-3-1 unless the oppostition has complete control and gives them the time to set it up. If you don't dilly dally it's SO easy to beat the 1-3-1. Just move the puck quickly and charge full speed up the weak side. If you are opposed, dump and crash hard. They have 4 guys in the neutral zone... they have very little chance of gaining control over a dumped puck.

Since: Nov 15, 2006
Posted on: November 11, 2011 7:34 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

A win is a win. It is a great defensive scheme. I took the Lightning to the Eastern Conference finals last year when all you so called "Experts" didn't even have them making the playoffs. Keep up the good work Boucher! I applaud you!

Since: Jul 9, 2007
Posted on: November 11, 2011 7:15 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

I agree its a great way to lose...hopefully they will continue to do that same trick the rest of the season.

Since: May 18, 2010
Posted on: November 11, 2011 7:08 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

The trap sucks. It is boring and it is awesome that Pronger did that.

Since: Jul 9, 2007
Posted on: November 11, 2011 6:48 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

I think that the league should consider a stoppage of play if the offending team does not advance the puck into the neutral zone within a given time limit. 

Ex.  Pronger collects the puck behind his net, after ten seconds of stalling the ref issues a stoppage of play and a faceoff takes place in the Flyers zone.  Simple solution if you ask me.  No penalties, but the stalling team runs the risk of losing a defensive faceoff. 

Since: Oct 15, 2007
Posted on: November 11, 2011 6:34 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

The team *with* the puck has to move it forward and, if I recall right that is even stated in the rules. Tampa was not at fault here and Philly should have been penalized for delay of game at least twice because of this.

Since: Jan 9, 2010
Posted on: November 11, 2011 6:19 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

You first.  No you first.  No you first.  What a bunch of babies the Flyers were.  I was at the game with 8 flyers fans.  They were ashamed of the play.  Not one of them said thats the way to play.  The Flyers delayed the game 7 times and then blames the other team.  It must be Bushes fault.

Since: May 12, 2011
Posted on: November 11, 2011 5:12 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

Boucher is kind of in the same shoes as Charles Darwin was when he came up the theory of natural selection. Everyone Laughed, Pointed their fingers, Told him "hey Charles youre ruining our god notion!" threw tomatoes at him. But Charle's theory was in the guidelines of already established Laws, the more they tried to scrutinize it, the more it made scientific sense. Wouldn't a good taction of hockey, much like a good scientist use all the rules/ laws that he has to create a new way of doing things/ looking at things?

Since: Sep 4, 2010
Posted on: November 11, 2011 5:08 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

Hockey has definitely gotten more boring over the years.  Skill players never seem to have the room to display their skills.  I predict that within 10 years hockey will permanently be 4 on 4.

Since: May 12, 2011
Posted on: November 11, 2011 4:58 am

It's a trap: Tampa Bay's system under attack

If this was so boring why is the Tampa / Flyers game the most blogged about game so far this season by a HUGE margin? I think people are confusing the feelings of frustration with the notion of boring.  13305 days, 5 hours, 57 minutes, and 31 seconds in counting.. since the Flyers have lifted lord stanley :>(   <- 2004 Lightning troll face.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or