Blog Entry

Parcells has HOF chops, his exclusion a mystery

Posted on: February 4, 2012 6:32 pm
Edited on: February 4, 2012 10:25 pm
I'm not going to be one of those whining, smirking people who complains about the Hall of Fame voting process. I know some of those men in the room. Many are skilled, brilliant and extremely smart about the game. A handful are arrogant jerks with hardcore agendas but the vast majority know what they are doing.

So I'm not going to complain as much as simply be stunned over the omission of Bill Parcells. I'm not a Parcells fan. He treated many people in my business terribly and wasn't exactly a great human being. But to me, in history, there are few better coaches.

The two greatest motivators in NFL history, the coaches who got players to do things and go places in their careers they thought they never could, were Don Shula and Parcells. The best pure motivators ever. Period. That is a coach's primary job. Nothing happens before that -- not the Xs and Os, nothing -- before getting a player mentally ready. Shula was the best at that (what he did in Miami with the then expansion Dolphins is borderline miraculous) and Parcells was second.

He turned around the Giants, the Patriots and Jets when those latter two organizations were absolutely awful.

My guess as to what hurt Parcells. First -- and no one will admit this but it's true -- the way he treated some writers played a factor. Writers have long memories and we can be just as petty anyone else. There likely were a few writers in the room who were either treated poorly by Parcells -- or know people who were -- and this was a form of payback.

I've also heard some writers over the years (including some in that room) say that Bill Belichick made Parcells and Parcells never made it back to a Super Bowl without Belichick.

But most importantly it is accurate that when Parcells left organizations he left them atomized. His departures were sometimes very ugly and it likely also did not help Parcells that he left the Dolphins in semi-ruins.

But overall his record -- he took the Giants, Jets, Patriots and Cowboys to the playoffs while winning two of three Super Bowl appearances -- was more than enough to overcome his faults.

No, not a complaint here. Just sort of stunned.

Since: Feb 4, 2012
Posted on: February 4, 2012 8:03 pm

Parcells has HOF chops, his exlcusion a mystery

Can we get a voter to come out from behind the skirts of their secret little process and explain exactly why they think he does not belong?  There are some fine football players who just got voted in, but not one of them deserves to be there before Parcells.  Maybe he should have lost more Super Bowls, as that worked for Levy and Grant.  And they lost those Super Bowls with Hall of Fame quarterbacks (Kelly/Tarkenton), while Parcells won his with the terminally underrated Phil Simms and the nondescript Jeff Hostetler.

This is Rock and Roll Hall of Fame level nonsense.  

Since: Sep 25, 2007
Posted on: February 4, 2012 6:45 pm

Parcells not making Hall of Fame a mystery

THis is what I'm talking about.  Parcells overall record does not measure up to some of the others (Belechick, Cowher, Coughlin, etc.)  But his overall contributions to the game make him a logical candidate.  Media bias for his brash and controlling ways will be what holds him back and that is a shame.  Will he ever get in with the folks you mention in the article who have the hard core agendas?  I cant say but he is better than a few of the selections today and defintely deserving!

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or