Forgot Log-in or  Password? |  Help  Not a member, Register Now!

Dennis Dodd

Dodds and Ends  

Name: Private
Gender:
Member Since: February 8, 2008
Email: Private
Favorite Teams  

North Carolina, Mary Poppins and the NCAA

Posted on: August 27, 2010 11:28 am
Edited on: August 27, 2010 11:31 am
  •  
 

Who knew Mary Poppins could conjugate a verb?

Butch Davis' "nanny" reportedly wrote papers for North Carolina's players. Seriously? My first reaction was: define nanny. I mean, really. Was she licensed? I googled "nanny service" and "Chapel Hill" and got three hits: Triangle Mothercare Inc., Take a Minute housecleaning, organizing and babysitting and -- ah, here it is -- Thee Nanny Service.

The page didn't open. I've heard them called au pairs or baby sitters more than nannys. The only nanny I know has bad dental work, Nanny McPhee. Shame on Emma Thompson for taking the check for that one.

The job title conjures up images of proper English women with umbrellas and really tight buns (Hairstyle, people! Hairstyle!). I suspect what we're talking about here is semantics. "Nanny" is a lot more inflammatory than "babysitter" or "tutor". Take the words "Nanny" "NCAA" "wrote papers" and "North Carolina" and you've got the makings of a New York Post headline.

Take that image and plop it down in the middle of Carolina's football program and ... well, it's unbelievable.

Unbelievable because Davis is a fixer. The tragic irony of this North Carolina story is that Davis got Miami back on track after crippling NCAA penalties in the 1990s. It was his recruiting that provided the foundation for the 2001 national championship (coached by Larry Coker). Before that, the Canes were what USC is going to be in coming years. Down, out, playing scrubs.

Then a week before signing day, Davis left for the NFL and you couldn't blame him for returning to his roots. Davis was arguably on his way to repeating the Miami turnaround at Carolina. The Tar Heels haven't been relevant in football since Mack Brown 13 years ago. Now this.

There are NCAA investigations on two fronts. Just when you thought the South Beach party possibly involving defender Marvin Austin, looked bad, the real sordid stuff hit Thursday. A nanny/tutor/whatever writing papers for players. The school called it "academic misconduct". Let's call it what it is (if true) -- academic fraud.

That's lack of institutional control stuff. Given the current mood among the NCAA infractions committee, that's USC-like stuff, aka coming within an eyelash of the death penalty. Sure it's early. As we speak, an entire armored division of lawyers are headed to Chapel Hill.

But it's these early stages that freak people out. Las Vegas sportsbooks began taking North Carolina-LSU off the board. The line moved North Carolina being favored to LSU. The only tangible "penalties" so far are that a few players were shifted over to the scout team. That's not punitive. That's sensible. Davis likely knows he won't be able to use them against LSU (at least), why practice them with the first team?

No jokes here: This has to hurt North Carolina. It is a great academic institution. It's pride and rep have been wounded. In a way, it's a reminder that this kind of stuff can happen anywhere. If there is any solace, there's always a spoonful of sugar ...

  •  
Category: NCAAF
Comments Add a Comment
UGAbiggestfan
Since: Dec 1, 2007
Posted on: August 27, 2010 7:49 pm
 

UGA did this in basketball

My alma mater, Georgia, is perenially awful at basketball sans recent history with Mark Fox.  That said, we made a deal with the devil when Jim Harrick was hired and he left the basketball program in a crash and burn situation.  North Carolina is perenially good at basketball and awful at football.  It is unfortunate that it appears that North Carolina broke rules to be good at a sport they just will never transcend in.  Sort of like UGA in basketball.


eastbayroths
Since: Mar 18, 2008
Posted on: August 27, 2010 7:25 pm
 

North Carolina, Mary Poppins and the NCAA

The problem with "uncfansen86" or anyone striking similar chord is that you are arguing from a perspective of relativity, that this potential infraction is "not as bad" as what the other guy did, etc.  The writer states "When a tutor writes papers for players, it is one thing..." and moves to spin that form of CHEATING vs. what happened at FSU.  Cheating is cheating.  Breaking the rules is breaking the rules.  The only thing we might agree on is that it is positive the UNC is trying to move quickly (it seems) to do what it can to get to the bottom of it all.  "On matters less severe" matters not!  And in the case of UNC, you cannot sit on high and enjoy a lofty reputation one day and then bemoan the fact you are a bigger target.  Not when you're enjoying the view when things are rosy.



wbguitar1
Since: Apr 29, 2009
Posted on: August 27, 2010 5:22 pm
 

North Carolina, Mary Poppins and the NCAA

Guess the idea that some schools are 'above' this sort of thing, is just that...an idea.  No one offers proof of cheating by Calipari, but you latch onto that as if its fact.  Others do the same when UNC is accused, and quickly its said - its not proven.  
When its about another school, we're all quick to believe it.  When its our school, we deny it.
I always maintain - there's nothing going on in Lexington, that isn't going on in Chapel Hill, Ann Arbor, Gainesville, Durham, or anyplace else.  Big-time D-1 programs all have shady characters around; kids playing AAU ball get benefits, I mean, let's be real about it.  Deep-pocketed boosters are always looking to take care of the kids from their programs.  The idea that 'my school doesn't cheat, but others schools do' is naive...



uncfansens86
Since: Dec 13, 2006
Posted on: August 27, 2010 4:06 pm
 

North Carolina, Mary Poppins and the NCAA

Edited line: These things happen at universities everywhere and it just so happens that some get caught.
That kind of day... 


uncfansens86
Since: Dec 13, 2006
Posted on: August 27, 2010 4:03 pm
 

North Carolina, Mary Poppins and the NCAA

Its articles like this that perpetuate the stigma that CBS is a second-rate, read-at-your-own-risk sports site. First, your "special" writer claims that certain players were already removed from the team and then his report has to be taken down for its obvious inaccuracies. You allow him to return, this time making his claims in the form of "rumors." Whatever happened to verifying information before reporting it?

Now to you Dodd. If you had watched the press conference last night, as most people with a journalistic sense of integrity would have, you would know the definition of 'nanny' is not a nanny at all. As clear as day, Coach Davis stated that the tutor in question served the same role for Butch's son. He stated that he hired the girl in the same capacity that she aided the athletic department, a sensible thing don't you think? She did not have a 'nanny-like' relationship with the Davis family and its likely that she had little, if any, interaction with Coach Davis. 

The university certainly has its hands full trying to sort out this PR nightmare but your comments seem to insinuate that somehow Coach Davis was aware of the "academic fraud" and that he was permissive in its occurrence. Of the evidence revealed thus far, not a single piece suggests that this may be true. Comparing this situation to FSU (as some have) or USC (as you have) is simply ridiculous. When a tutor writes papers for players, it is one thing. When fake classes are created and tests are allowed to be taken online in a 'non-structured' environment, essentially encouraging players to cheat, that is another. When a player and his family live in a multi-million dollar residence, easily discoverable by anybody even remotely paying attention, it is also another thing. The reality here is that the academic violations were relatively minor compared to those at FSU and did not present the same 'look the other way' situation that USC did. Without a full-blown investigation there is little that could have been done to discover these improprieties. No school has the resources and time to launch such an investigation every year and even if they did, it appears this is an isolated event among a group of players for one team. This did not involve multiple teams (as FSU did) or a continuing pattern (as USC did). 

These things happen at university's everywhere and it just so happens that some get caught. If this were a different school, the media portrayal would likely be less "the sky is falling" and more "here we go again." Your coverage of Kentucky and the recruiting of Anthony Davis is the perfect example. Because of Calipari, it is not surprising that these situations continue to emerge and the media treats it as such. With Carolina, however, this all of a sudden becomes a firestorm. For that, I take both pride and disappointment. I love that my university is respected and holds a reputation of academic integrity but it also bothers me that they are forced to defend themselves with more force than other schools on matters that are less severe. What happened here is wrong, but it isn't worthy of "death penalty" talk. Lets let the full story come out before we start comparing paper writing to some of the most egregious NCAA violations in recent memory.


About Dodds and Ends
Follow me on Twitter: @dennisdoddcbs or your life will be unfulfilled.
RSS - Dodds and Ends Subscribe to this blog
Recent Blog Entries
Dennis Dodd's Favorites

No Favorites

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com