Blog Entry

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

Posted on: January 19, 2012 12:27 pm
 

In the second installment of our plus-one lookback (2003-2007), USC takes over from Miami to forge a dynasty before the SEC begins to go reticulated python on college football.  Oh, and sorry Texas. That 2005 title never happened.

(All plus-one games played on neutral fields. Here’s how things looked from 1998-2002.)

 

2003

BCS champion: LSU 21, Oklahoma 14

The setup:  By now, epic BCS fails were becoming commonplace. This time Oklahoma blew through the first 12 games of the season winning by an average of more than 32 points. That was before a four-touchdown loss to Kansas State in the Big 12 title game.

So much for the dangers of losing late.  Not only didn’t No. 1 OU fall out of the top two, it didn’t fall from the top spot! (It dropped from No. 1 to No. 3 in the human polls.) That was the first problem.  The second, more significant issue, is that USC was a consensus No. 1 in the human polls but No. 3 in the BCS.

Complicating matters, if that was possible, was three major-college, one-loss teams occupying the top three spots in the final BCS (OU, LSU, USC). One of them didn’t win its conference. The BCS commissioners swallowed hard, averted their eyes and tried to explain an LSU-Oklahoma championship game. The final absurdity: That meant the coaches poll would not even be considering its No. 1 team (USC) for the national championship.

Thank goodness for the AP poll.  After USC beat Michigan in the Rose Bowl, AP gave its final No. 1 ranking to the Trojans. For the first time in the BCS era, there was a split national championship. While that was OK with most folks, certain LSU fans couldn’t stomach sharing anything with anyone. Two things wrong with that: Like five other teams prior to the bowls that year, LSU was a one-loss team. By now it was becoming clear that if you lose a game in the BCS system, you lose the right to argue.

Isn’t it enough that national championships are forever? I still get emails from angry Tiger fans who claim they are the true national champs. Who cares?

How a four-team playoff would have changed things:  No. 1 Oklahoma vs. No. 4 Michigan, No. 2 LSU vs. No. 3 USC. OU would have easily mauled Michigan. The Rose Bowl that season proved it. USC outclassed the slower Wolverines by two touchdowns in Pasadena. Oklahoma 35, Michigan 17.

Many would have considered LSU-USC the real championship game. This was the year LSU freshman sensation Justin Vincent ran for 1,000 yards. Defensive tackle Chad Lavalais was the SEC defensive player of the year. USC had Reggie Bush as a freshman, Matt Leinart as a sophomore throwing to the  fantastic Mike Williams. This was the beginning of a Troy dynasty with the Trojans at least playing for three consecutive national championships in the real world. In this alternative universe it would have been a thriller, USC 27, LSU 20.

Championship game: Heisman winner Jason White was beat up for the Sooners at this point in the season. He hung in gamely against LSU but the Tigers defense and the Superdome crowd were too much. USC would have brought a similar kind of hurt. USC 23, Oklahoma 14.

Fantasy quote: “Sure we deserve a championship berth. It wasn’t like we lost to K-State by five touchdowns.” –Bob Stoops.

Who got screwed: Obviously USC, but AP was there to bail it out. That would change after the 2004 season, though, as the news organization rethought its influence on the national championship race and the money that went with it.

 

2004

BCS champion: USC 55, Oklahoma 19

The setup: For the first time in the BCS era, three undefeated teams stood atop the polls at the end. The BCS quickly realized that three don’t fit into two championship berths. Auburn eventually “lost”. There is still the lasting image of Tommy Tuberville working the press box for AP votes at the Orange Bowl after the BCS had kept the undefeated SEC champions out of the BCS title game. While the Trojans and Sooners played, Auburn’s coach was literally glad-handing media, hoping against hope.

It didn’t happen for Auburn which finished third in the BCS and second in the final human polls. SEC types were outraged that their undefeated champion wasn’t worthy of playing for it all. As you might have noticed, things would change quickly for the SEC.

The difference was Auburn’s non-conference schedule and perhaps an Oklahoma-friendly Bowling Green AD.  Elsewhere, both the Trojans and Sooners were in the middle of historic runs. OU played in its third championship game since 2000. USC was in the middle of its own 34-game winning streak. Only Stanford, Cal and UCLA came within a touchdown of the Trojans that season.

How a four-team playoff would have changed things: No. 1 USC vs. No. 4 Texas, No. 2 Oklahoma vs. No. 3 Auburn.  Texas wasn’t quite there yet despite 1,000-yard rushing seasons from both Cedric Benson and Vince Young. Meanwhile, USC sported a Heisman winner (Leinart) as well as three other consensus All-Americans. This was arguably the best Trojan team of the Pete Carroll era. USC 37, Texas 24.

Would have loved to see the nation’s No. 1 scoring defense (Auburn) against No. 8 in total offense (Oklahoma). Using LSU’s D in 2003 as evidence, OU doesn’t show up offensively in a plus-one against a quality SEC defense. Auburn 25, Oklahoma 21.

Championship game: Auburn gets its title shot but just can’t overcome perhaps the team of the decade. USC 26, Auburn 13.

Fantasy quote: “How many voters does a commissioner have to bribe for the SEC to get to the championship game?” – Mike Slive

Real quote: “Where’s Your God Now?” – sign taunting BYU fans at Rice-Eccles Stadium in the final seconds of Utah’s 52-21 win over the Cougars that clinched the Utes’ first BCS berth.

Who got screwed: Cal. With one BCS bowl berth left, the No. 5 Bears lost a propaganda war with No. 4 Texas. Both were 10-1 on pick ‘em day. Knowing that finishing at No. 4 guaranteed his team a BCS bowl, Mack Brown had no problem campaigning for his Longhorns while Cal’s Jeff Tedford pretty much refused to engage.

Cal would have been the obvious Pac-10 replacement in the Rose Bowl with USC playing for the national championship. But Texas’ bum rush created feelings that what Bevo wants, Bevo gets long before the Longhorn Network.

“"I guess we didn't run up the score at the end, or beg for votes after the game," Cal’s Aaron Rodgers said. "I thought it was [wrong] for coach Brown to beg for votes.”

AP withdrew its poll from the BCS after the controversy.



2005

BCS champion: Texas 41, USC 38

The setup: On paper USC never won a game this season. On the field, it ravaged the field. We would find out years later that Bush competed the entire 2005 season while ineligible having taken cash and benefits from two would-be agents.

Dismiss that from your mind considering how these Trojans were completing that 34-game winning streak. They failed to score less than 34 in any game. They scored at least 50 in seven games. They scored 60 twice and 70 once. This was the team that couldn’t be outscored -- until it was, by Vince Young.

On the night of Jan. 5, 2006 Texas’ quarterback proved himself to be the best player in the school’s glorious history. Completing a game in which he had almost 500 yards in total offense, Young pulled it down and scored the winning touchdown with 19 seconds left.

USC was denied a third straight national championship. Texas won its first in 35 years because of a singular talent.

"Without question that was the best [performance] by one guy [I've seen]," Pete Carroll said.

How a four-team playoff would have changed things: No. 1 USC vs. No. 4 Ohio State, No. 2 Texas vs. No. 3 Penn State. Anyone else have a letdown here? Ohio State was a year away in 2005 having lost to Texas and Penn State in the regular season. JoePa rebounded from downturn to begin the century to grab a share of the Big Ten. It is interesting that two Big Ten teams would have been in a plus-one. Does it matter, though, given the greatness at the top?

USC 42, Ohio State 20. Texas 44, Penn State 17.

Championship game: With his defense gassed and resting on the sidelines, this time Carroll decides to use Bush on fourth down. In the real game he didn’t. That allowed Texas to stop LenDale White on fourth down which led to the Horns’ winning drive. USC 38, Texas 35.

Fantasy quote: “I’m predicting two Super Bowls for Vince Young.” – Beano Cook

Who got screwed:  USC players who gave their heart, soul, blood, sweat and tears for the program only to have the season ripped away in disgrace because of Bush’s selfishness. In case you forgot, the NCAA vacated USC’s 2005 season as part of the Bush penalties.

 

2006

BCS champion: Florida 41, Ohio State 14

In the latest BCS game ever played (Jan. 9), the system began to take different turns. Double-hosting debuted. A few days before the Gators swamped the Buckeyes, Boise beat Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl in one of the sport’s greatest upsets. A player proposed to a cheerleader. The Broncos proved they could play with the big boys, a cry that still is ringing in our ears today.

Oh yeah, and the SEC started a streak for the ages. The first of six consecutive titles by the Strength Everywhere Conference began with Florida thrashing Ohio State.

That year the immortal Chris Leak was backed up at Florida by some kid named Tebow. During the season we were treated to the jump pass, winning a game by a fingernail and first of two national championships by Urban Meyer.

How a four-team playoff would have changed things: No. 1 Ohio State vs. No. 4 LSU, No. 2 Florida vs. No. 3 Michigan. The Buckeyes blitzed through the regular season setting up Jim Tressel for his second national championship in five years. Les Miles was just getting going, posting his second straight 11-2 season. We were going to see LSU-Ohio State in 2007 anyway. In a playoff, the Buckeyes arrived a year early with Troy Smith, Ted Ginn Jr. and company winning a close one. Ohio State 31, LSU 27.

Denied a rematch with Ohio State by the pollsters and computers, Michigan would have welcomed a playoff. Coming off one of the most emotional games in Michigan history (losing to Ohio State the day after Bo Schembechler’s passing), there was a chance to sneak in the back door for a national championship. Florida’s D would have denied it. Florida 37, Michigan 21.

Championship: We’re assuming that Ginn Jr. doesn’t injure his foot celebrating a kickoff return. We still can’t assume Ohio State would have an answer for Florida’s team speed. Florida 31, Ohio State 21.

Fantasy quote: “We got tattooed.” – Tressel.

Who gagged: USC. Needing only to win over sliding UCLA to play for another title, the Trojans coughed up one of the program’s largest hairballs. The 13-9 loss to the Bruins on the last day of the regular season remains inexplicable to this day except to then-UCLA defensive  coordinator DeWayne Walker. He helped hold the Trojans to less than 20 points for the first time in 64 games

 


2007

BCS champion: LSU 38, Ohio State 24

Let’s see … LSU in New Orleans? Again? Call it another unintended consequence of the BCS. The commissioners probably never imagined the Tigers being good at the exact same time the Superdome was hosting the big game. Call it purple and gold serendipity.

And luck. In the fastest and more furious finish of the BCS era, both No. 1 (Missouri) and No. 2 (West Virginia) lost on the last day of the season allowing  the Buckeyes and Tigers to move up. A week earlier, LSU had lost at home, giving up 50 to Arkansas. After beating Tennessee in the SEC championship game, the Tigers moved from No. 7 to No. 2.

How a four-team playoff would have changed things: No. 1 Ohio State vs. No. 4 Oklahoma. No. 2 LSU vs. No. 3 Virginia Tech. This was an unspectacular Oklahoma team that lost to Colorado and Texas Tech before being smoked by West Virginia in the Fiesta Bowl. Ohio State 31, Oklahoma 23.

In a plus-one, the ACC champion would have played for a national championship in a rematch we didn’t need to see. In the second week of the season, the Tigers smoked the Hokies 48-7 in Baton Rouge. Play it again, Les? LSU 33, Virginia Tech 14.

Championship game: What hurt Buckeye pride is that LSU was the last comic standing in 2007 in a wild finish to the season. The Tigers were the first two-loss team to win a national championship in 47 years. And still, LSU was able to score 31 unanswered to bury the Bucks. By now, the jokes and labels associated with Ohio State were beginning to leave a mark.

“Yeah, and that hurts," said Ohio State linebacker James Laurinaitis, "just because the media really builds it up like we are slow and all that stuff."

The Bucks football reputation was in tatters after two straight championship losses. In a few years, that rep was about to get a whole lost worse. LSU 42, Ohio State 17.

 Fantasy quote: “Next?” – SEC

Who got screwed: The fans. Hawaii was non-competitive against Georgia in the Sugar Bowl. The Rose Bowl got three-loss Illinois to match against USC. West Virginia lost Rich Rod, then promoted Bill Stewart before a rout of Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl. The average margin of victory in the five BCS bowls (20 points) was second only to 2002 (22.5 points).

Plus-one champions, 2003-2007: USC, USC, USC, Florida, LSU.

Tomorrow: A plus-one from 2008 to 2011.   

Comments

Since: Oct 23, 2006
Posted on: January 19, 2012 10:53 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

Big Boy

The Texas poster is merely questioning why the writer suddenly has 2005 USC beating 2005 Texas for no good reason.

Or he has LSU curb stomping Ohio State by 20 more points than they actually did.

It is one thing to hypothetically pick games that did not happen.  That is a neat idea.

I actually agree that USC would win some of those match-ups that never happened.

Matchups that never happened are speculations.  I can understand making informed opinions about those outcomes.

However, 2 of his picks were actually played on a real field that BCS season.

We saw USC-Texas and Ohio State-LSU.  I have no idea why those outcomes become entirely diffrent in this article.




Since: Jan 19, 2012
Posted on: January 19, 2012 10:03 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

A plus-one playoff based only upon rankings still relies too heavily on subjective opinions.  I think the 3 top seeds should be the top 3 ranked teams that also won their conference championship game.  The fourth seed should be selected at an at-large championship game between the top 2 ranked teams (from different conferences) that did not have the opportunity to play in a championship game.  This year Alabama would have been pitted against Oklahoma State and the winner would have played LSU at whatever bowl LSU was bound for.  The winner of that game would have played the Rose Bowl champs for the national title.   This way every conference championship would be a potential quarterfinal and the at-large championship would be a huge ($$$) game and would eliminate the irrational 2nd place 'bye' enjoyed by Alabama this year.



Since: Oct 9, 2006
Posted on: January 19, 2012 10:00 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

C'mon Dodd, how do you leave Utah completely out of the 2004 section? 

That Utah team led by Alex Smith and coached by Urban Meyer went undefeated and could have beaten anybody that year. 

How about some respect and some sense when you write up the 2008 season.....    
 

     



Since: Sep 30, 2008
Posted on: January 19, 2012 10:00 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

Maybe Dodd can do a best of trio LB from the past decade. That would be interetsing



Since: Sep 30, 2008
Posted on: January 19, 2012 9:58 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

One more thing, In 2008 USC would have curbed stomped both OU or Fla. Snachez beat the hell out of that # 1 defense tOSU 35 to 3 and follwed that up with a beatdown of a 11 & 1 PSU in the Rose Bowl


I know how some nimrods like to say that the PAC doesn't play defense, well the PAC is known for their Offense, unlike the SEC, yet they held their opponents to just 9 points that year, With Ray Ray, Mathews & Cushing are you freaking Kidding me 



Since: Dec 8, 2006
Posted on: January 19, 2012 9:54 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

Had WVU not been so hideous against pitt, none of the others wouldhave stood a chance.  Just ask the Sooners.



Since: Sep 30, 2008
Posted on: January 19, 2012 9:49 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

Best article ever! Your what if game still puts Texas and USC playing for the title in 2005. What if Bush ran the ball instead of White? He would have been stuffed and lost more yardage than their bruising back. What if VY had 600 total yards? They lost in a real game, not hypothetical. They won playing against a technically ineligible Reggie Bush. What if Bush never played that season is the real question. USC would have never made it to the big game.

What if you actually wrote an intelligent meaningful article?


What if... VY was called down before  throwing that TD pass, What if.... USC wasn't called for a " Bogus Face mask" with 2:19 and 3 & 12 for the horns to give them a 1st down. What if.... Number 5 didn't do the most stupid thing he ever did in his career at USC and try and lateral the ball on the 1 yard line.


BTW, Number 5's parents didn't do anything to increase his abilities, so you to can whine like a little school Beoyatch all you want. USC was the better team that day, Vince Young was the better player that day. 



Since: Sep 30, 2008
Posted on: January 19, 2012 9:38 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

2004 Southern Cal was the team of the decade?  You've got to be kidding.  Sure, look at my Auburn logo and call me a homer all you want.  Mention that Southern Cal beat Auburn the two years before that in 02-03, even a blanking 23-0 at home, and laugh at my statements.  I get it, and I have heard it forever.


Get over it cry baby, USC would have curbed stomped your tigers in 04 too.







Since: Aug 22, 2006
Posted on: January 19, 2012 9:27 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

I can appreciate your sentiment, but one year does not equal a decade.  So yes, while Auburn may have been better in 2004, what about the rest of the, you know, DECADE?

Additionally, with all due respect, you guys had quite a bit of drama and close wins last year in your national championship year - so should that not also be taken into account when talking about that team's legacy?

Just my take... 



Since: Aug 10, 2006
Posted on: January 19, 2012 9:07 pm
 

A plus-one playoff through the years: 2003-2007

2004 Southern Cal was the team of the decade?  You've got to be kidding.  Sure, look at my Auburn logo and call me a homer all you want.  Mention that Southern Cal beat Auburn the two years before that in 02-03, even a blanking 23-0 at home, and laugh at my statements.  I get it, and I have heard it forever.

But the 2004 Auburn team was lights out better than the 9-4 and 8-5 Auburn teams Southern Cal beat.  Auburn was much improved that year, and had they played, they likely would have beat Southern Cal just like all these other years the SEC has won the game, and it wouldn't have been any different.   

Look at Southern Cal's 04 season.  You've got to be joking.  First, I clearly remember, they needed a very controversial call to beat Va Tech late in the game.  They then almost drop a game to Stanford, and this is the old Stanford I may add.  Heart stopper with Cal and Oregon State, then lets not forget the almost embarrassing debacle to UCLA.  Team of the decade is laughable.  They almost lost five games that year in a very bad defensive league. 

All of Auburn's games with the exception to LSU and BAMA were over at half time against better players as evidenced by NFL rosters the past 10 years.  The LSU team was a Nick Saban defending BCS title team and Alabama was on the road in the most hated rivalry in the country.  Auburn could have hung 70 on teams but Tuberville would run the ball the entire second half. 

Even in the two years Southern Cal beat those average Auburn teams, USC only scored 24 and 23 points, as bad as Auburn struggled on offense.  Auburn was much improved on offense in 04 and that would have been the difference.  Auburn would have performed just as well on defense as the two previous games and Auburn could have scored on them.  Auburn would have won that game in my opinion.

And before you bring up Auburn's game to VT in the bowl game for a common opponent.  Spare me.  Anyone watching that game knows what happened.  Auburn was up 16-0 with 7 min left about to blank them and Tuberville had taken the foot off the gas and ran that ball like always the entire second half.  VT got two late blown coverages to make that score look close.  Auburn flat out dominated VT both sides of the ball and played them tougher than USC.

Just my take...    


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com