Play Fantasy The Most Award Winning Fantasy game with real time scoring, top expert analysis, custom settings, and more. Play Now
Blog Entry

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

Posted on: February 8, 2012 2:39 pm
 

When the ACC raided the Big East once again in September, the stated intention of the fractured league was to remain a BCS conference. Or whatever the definition of a big time conference was going to be in 2014.

That’s the year when everything changes. College football’s postseason is going to be adjusted, making it less about what league you’re in and more about what your league is worth. Right now, the reconstituted Big East is attempting to rebuild its worth before increasing it.

And that’s the tragedy that overshadowed this week’s announcement that Memphis was joining the league in 2013. A few months ago Big East turned down a massive $1 billion offer from ESPN, hoping for something better. Sounds laughable now, doesn’t it? Memphis is in the league for the same reason West Virginia is suing to get out of it.

"The Big East and its Commissioner failed to take proactive measures to maintain, let alone enhance, the level of competition for the Big East football schools,” West Virginia’s lawsuit against the Big East reads.

Remember, this is a football discussion. While Big East basketball remains powerful, it is the economics of TV that football still drives these contracts. By far. Then throw in the fact that college basketball on television is becoming oversaturated. Football is going to have to carry the new Big East when formal negotiations begin later this year.

Things have changed a lot in six months. Commissioner John Marinatto has gambled and won in the sense that is league is still a league. He has lost in that a TV windfall along the lines of $1 billion look less likely. That was the amount ESPN offered last year (for nine years) to broadcast the Big East.

That was before the ACC struck and West Virginia left. Since then, Marinatto’s league has been reduced to selling the Big East brand to the likes of San Diego State more than selling Big East football.  Memphis is marginally better off, I suppose, than in Conference USA. Still, the jokes about Boise State being in the Big East West Division haven’t died down. It’s a great week for Memphis but in the end the school was nothing more than a live body willing fill out the lineup.

And that lineup for 2013 looks more like Conference USA. In about 2005. In fact, the projected 2013 Big East roster includes seven former Conference USA schools.

Back in the mid-2000s the Conference USA football deal was worth about $9 million per year. The current Big East deal, due to run out in 2014, is worth about $35 million per year for what in 2011 was eight teams.

That’s after the league turned down that $1 billion offer last year. Think an average of $111 million per year would have kept the 21-year old football conference together? It certainly would have kept the Big East on ESPN which all that matters these days as conferences morph into content farms for TV. Now there is speculation that the Worldwide Leader, upset at being rejected, could lowball the Big East  when its deal expires after 2013-14. Or drop out all together.

One industry analyst texted me saying the addition of Syracuse and Pittsburgh to the ACC alone  will worth more than a new Big East deal in 2014. The Sports Business Journal reported Monday that the addition of Pittsburgh and Syracuse will mean a $1 million-$2 million bump per year for ACC members. In a matter of a whirlwind few months, the Big East’s hopes for a lucrative TV contract now rest with Boise State, Connecticut, Houston and Rutgers.

Those are the four most attractive Big East schools to TV, according to the analyst.

CBS Sports Network may be interested in the new Big East-to-West Conference. The same goes for the NBC/Comcast. Its new NBC Sports Network needs programming. But don’t expect a bidding war. That’s what has driven up the price of college football in the past decade – the public’s insatiable desire for more of it. But even during that gold rush there has been a clear dividing line – thank you, BCS – between the haves and have nots.

The Big East-to-West TV carrier(s) may pay a lot more than $35 million, but it/they won’t overpay. The point is not to lose money on a diminished football league, especially with the Big 12 out there for grabs in 2015.

No matter what the outcome, the Big East is going to be something like the sixth-richest conference, just like it was in the last round of negotiations.  The same market forces still apply. The Big East has been in the BCS only because of a waiver granted in 2007. The latest BCS contract expires in a couple of years, coincidentally at about the same time as the Big East’s TV contract.

Former Big East commissioner Mike Tranghese always said there should be a major college football presence in the Northeast. Sadly, that’s not the case anymore. Not in one conference. The league always claimed New York in its TV footprint. But with Syracuse leaving and San Diego, Boise, Houston and Memphis coming in, how much longer can Big East football be a big presence in the <>East<> much less nationwide?

 

Comments

Since: Feb 17, 2012
Posted on: February 17, 2012 2:38 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

The new Big East is an exciting group of emerging teams.  Over the past seven years I have seen my UCONN Huskies beat Indiana at Storrs in 2004 right out of the box (BIG 10).  I have also seen them beat Baylor (Big 12), West Virginia and Notre Dame in South bend, winning a conference championship and a trip to the Fiesta bowl in 2010.   UCONN has dominated Syracuse over the past 7 seasons. Granted we have 7 ex CUSA teams but they are teams with excellent upsides with regard to TV markets, facilities, recruiting and fan base. Notre Dame being a league member except for football brings a good deal of Market clout because of their National following and NBC TV contract.  Some of us believe this relationship will hold significant weight in TV contract negotiations. The New Big East fans know who we are. Ten years ago, UCONN was playing in the Yankee conference but we have come a long way Baby!  We do not have delusions of grandure and realise the difference between the SEC and the other power leagues.  We are an emerging growth stock as opposed to an old line Blue Chip.  Investments in growth stocks like Apple and Google have had tremendous growth and pay huge dividends. I expect that the new TV deal that the Big East signs will morph the Billion dollar deal offered by ESPN last year.  There may be some initial risk taking but in the long run whomever gets this contract will reap many years of solid growth. So welcome, UCF, Memphis, Navy, Houston, SMU, Boise State and San Diego State.  UCONN, Cincy, Loisville, Rutgers, and USF, thanks for your committment to growing your programs.  We look forward to the 4 time zone Big East and the hours of solid coast to coast entertainment.    We look forward to growing with you all in an effort to together becoming a great, competitive college football conference!  Cudos to  John Marinatto for pulling this off! 
 



Since: Nov 9, 2006
Posted on: February 10, 2012 9:23 am
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

Please have someone edit this garbage in the future so that is in english. 



Since: May 1, 2011
Posted on: February 9, 2012 4:41 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

Georgia is 0-2 vs future Big East teams in past two years. In fact EIGHT of the future 12 BigEast teams have wins vs sec schools in past 5 years.



Since: May 1, 2011
Posted on: February 9, 2012 4:25 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

Last I checked Georgia lost to Boise State a future Big East team. Auburn lost to USF So if it's so bad how the heck are sec teams ever losing to them



Since: Sep 20, 2011
Posted on: February 9, 2012 1:47 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

No - they keep bashing because it's a horrible league & the comish is a horrible one as well.  They should have just turned into a basketball league & been done with it.



Since: Nov 19, 2006
Posted on: February 9, 2012 10:41 am
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

The Big East is a joke, and their Commish obviously suffers from illusions of grandure.  Turning down the 1 Billion Dollar offer was stupidity in it's purest form.  What really gets to me is the fact that Big Least fans, as well as their Commish, actually think that they have a good football conference.  The Big Least is terrible.  They will become a disaster when Pitt and Syracuse join West Virginia as a defector.  There is the possibility that Big least teams may have to play each other twice this season to fill out the schedule.  With the possibility looming large that the Big 12 makes a move and takes Louisville, and possibly Cincinnati soon, the Big Least had better get what it can.  The Big 12 T.V. contract is to be renegotiated in 2015, and a 12 team Big 12 with a Conference Championship game will be worth a lot more than a 10 or 11 team Big 12.



Since: May 1, 2011
Posted on: February 8, 2012 3:37 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

First off the deal the ACC got from adding Pitt and Cuse was limited. Espn allowed a renegotiation of a previous contract. They didn't have to do it and they had no one to bid against the m. Secondly everyone can bash the Big East all they want but as you said it will be the sixt highest paying league and thus the best deal for all those teams. As for BYU we'll we hall see who gets the last laugh. If the new BE tv contract is better than what Espn pays byu then who is the weak link.



Since: Feb 8, 2012
Posted on: February 8, 2012 3:22 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

I am soooooo glad that BYU did not join the Big East-West mess. With the addition of Memphis, it has officially become the laughingstock of college football. Really? Memphis? SDSU? Wow. 



Since: Dec 6, 2011
Posted on: February 8, 2012 3:15 pm
 

Big East-to-West moves forward sluggishly

Article after article -- bashing the Big East... what is the hope, push the price down so your network can get its share dirt cheap in trying to fill out its sports portfolio?


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com