Blog Entry

Chiefs and Jones: Not a good idea

Posted on: March 9, 2010 7:17 pm
There's an axiom I've long sworn by in the NFL, and that's this: If you're going to be bad, be bad young. Don't be bad old.

Translation: Give time to young and inexperienced players, not vets. You want players with bright futures, not long and storied pasts.  Unfortunately, that is not the way the Kansas City Chiefs are operating.

I don't get the Chiefs. A couple of years ago they had a terrific draft, understanding that they'd hit rock bottom and determined to retool from the ground up. But then they changed administrations and coaching staffs and started courting veteran players -- like running back Thomas Jones, who signed with the club Tuesday.

I know the guy was productive a year ago, and I know he scored 14 touchdowns, or five more than the Chiefs' Jamaal Charles. But he turns 32 this season, and, I'm sorry, I don't want any 32-year-old running backs taking up space on the roster of a 4-12 team.

Jones wasn't expensive. Reports have him signing for $3 million this season and $2 million in 2011, but that's not the point. He's old. He won't play special teams. And he's taking snaps from somebody with a future. If you're going to be bad, Kansas City, be bad with young players, not with Thomas Jones.

Category: NFL

Since: Mar 25, 2009
Posted on: March 9, 2010 7:45 pm

Chiefs and Jones: Not a good idea

Or maybe the Chiefs are trying to not be bad anymore, which I know, is a very difficult thing to understand. The Chiefs needed a back that is able to get a 3rd and 1 and they got him for the next two years. They now can wait to draft a power back for two years instead of taking that pick this year when there are so many other needs.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or