Blog Entry

Edwin in the 3 hole? Crazy, but why not?

Posted on: May 16, 2008 2:29 pm
Edited on: May 16, 2008 2:30 pm

This idea is a little risky for some, and practically blasphemy for others. Batting Edwin Encarnacion, the essence of inconsistancy, third instead of Griffey, he of the 597 home runs. But if you look past first impressions, there are some interesting stats that support it. Check out these stats from Edwin's first two full years in the majors, 2006 and 2007 (2006 first/2007 second)

  1. Normal average: .276/.289
  2. Bases empty: .230/.258
  3. With Runners on: .325/.325
  4. RISP: .306/.360
  5. Base Loaded: .467/.471

Thats a MAJOR difference when Edwin's in an RBI situation, its consistantly been that way over two seasons, and his stats improved the next year. Hitting well with RISP should be the #1 thing for a 3-hole hitter, and Edwin does it better than most. It also allows you to get the most out of a player. If these stats stay true, giving Edwin more RBI situations and less bases-empty ones would raise his average, maximizing his value for our team. Now look at Griffey's same stats over the past 3 seasons.

  1. Normal average: .277/.252/.301
  2. Bases empty: .276/.266/.302
  3. With Runners on: .278/.235/.300
  4. RISP: .244/.216/.263
  5. Bases Loaded: .300/.333/.375

His average actually has gone DOWN at least 30 points with RISP every season, and only with the bases loaded does his average consistantly jump. Again, if these stats hold true, giving Griffey less RBI situations shouldn't hurt his average at all, and POSSIBLY help it. Baseball is all about getting the most out of what you have, and all the stats say that moving Edwin to the 3-hole and dropping Griffey down a bit would make a big improvement to the Reds.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or