When everything is done and the press conferences have been held, Cliff Lee will have been traded twice in five months.
What's funny is that some people in baseball were already asking Wednesday whether he could be traded again.
"If [the Mariners] wanted to, they could definitely get back more than they gave up to get him," one executive said.
The same executive acknowledged that the Mariners -- who are definitely in win-now mode -- are highly unlikely to even think about trading Lee. Pairing him with Felix Hernandez atop the Seattle rotation makes the M's a serious threat to the Angels and Rangers in the American League West, so it doesn't even make sense for them to trade him now.
But what if the Mariners don't get off to a good start in 2010? What if they don't see a real chance of signing Lee long-term, especially while they're also trying to lock up Hernandez?
Well, with Lee headed for free agency at the end of the 2010 season, he could be one heck of a July trading chip again, couldn't he?
Think of it that way, and the Mariners have two big ways to be winners in this deal: Lee helps them win (entirely possible), or Lee brings back more than the Mariners gave up to get him.
"The Mariners just didn't give up a lot," another executive said. "[Phillippe] Aumont has a good arm, but he's a 20-year-old who is already a one-inning pitcher. I just don't know how he develops that way."
Two other Lee-Halladay trade thoughts:
1. Lee loved being with the Phillies, but the move to the Mariners could help his value as a free agent. For one thing, he'll be able to prove himself back in the American League, regarded as the tougher of the two leagues. For another, he'll be pitching in a big ballpark, with an outstanding defense behind him. And he'll be pitching for a team that has shown a willingness to spend.
"If Cliff Lee wants a big contract, he went to the right place," one of the executives said. "He's a fly-ball pitcher in a big ballpark, with Ichiro and [Franklin] Gutierrez playing the outfield."
2. For all those still debating the Phillies' end of the deal, the main point to remember is this: As much as the Phillies liked Lee, they have always liked Halladay more. It was true in July, and it's true now.
"He can beat the Yankees," one Phillies person said, which reminds you of where Philadelphia's focus is right now.
It feels funny to put it that way, since Lee beat the Yankees twice in the World Series (getting both Phillies wins). Over the last two years, including the World Series, Lee is 4-1 against the Yanks, with a 2.31 ERA.
The only difference with Halladay is that he has proven his Yankee dominance over a longer period, and that he's strong enough that the Phils could ask him to start three times in a seven-game series (which Lee didn't do).
In 37 career appearances against the Yanks, Halladay is 18-6 with a 2.84 ERA. Over the last two years, he has faced New York 11 times, going 8-2 with a 2.54 ERA.
The value of Cliff Lee
Posted on: December 16, 2009 2:32 pm
Comments Add a Comment
|
psubeerman21 |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 9:00 pm
The value of Cliff LeeI think all teams are winners - toronto got really got prospects, the M's got a proven number one starter, and the Phils got the best pitcher in baseball. And you know who we can thank? Mr. Pat Gillick, who has ties to all three organizations.
|
|
The Don Rey |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 8:51 pm
The value of Cliff LeeLee didn't start 3 against the Yanks because the Phils never made it to game 7. Why did Knobhead even bring that up. Such a baffoon this bald bimbo is.
|
|
Tennisben24 |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 8:40 pm
The value of Cliff LeeI think you're right on both accounts. It would have been nice to get a big hitter, but seeing us win a lot of one run games last year, it also feels good to have two ace pitchers to keep the scores low. Don't forget, King Felix had a couple injuries last year and is still developing a bit. It's good to be in a four team division!
|
|
Hawkman77 |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 7:57 pm
The value of Cliff Lee(as long as Griffey/Branyan don't hit into double plays all year after that!)And there's the real problem. The M's still end up with below average offense at more than half the spots in the order (SS, 1B, C, DH, and LF). I love the defense Jack Wilson and Rob Johnson provide, but any team carrying offensive lightweights like them has to make up for it somewhere else in the lineup, and I don't see that. Still, they were 8 games over .500 last year with a worse team, so their chances definitely look better than they have recently.
|
|
shplunker |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 6:13 pm
The value of Cliff LeeThe real question now is if they are going to be able to get Ichiro to hit 2nd or 3rd in the order. With Figgins leading off - Ichiro would be flat out deadly and could challenge the .400 mark hitting 2nd. Having to hold Figgins on...the hole between 1st and 2nd would be huge, not to mention the steals threat Figgins would put on the opposing pitcher and all the fastballs Ichiro would see. I could see 1st and 3rd all year long..... (as long as Griffey/Branyan don't hit into double plays all year after that!)
|
|
Hawkman77 |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 6:09 pm
The value of Cliff LeeYou gave up 3 picks for one year of Lee - that's the bottom line.Because this hasn't been stated enough, right?
What's important is who the picks are. Aumont no longer fit the M's long-term plans because they lost faith he would hold up as a starter, and he was excess with Josh Fields and Brandon Morrow around. Excellent arm, but not a good fit for the organization if he can't start, and they obviously decided he couldn't. Gilles could be missed. He's fast beyond fast, but athletic as well. Not just a Juan Pierre slap hitter with speed. Even Ramirez could develop. That's kind of the point, though, right? You have to give up talent to get talent? To me the bottom line is whether the Mariners can win this year with Lee, because that's why this deal was done. Management thought the chance was one worth taking. If they can't resign him, they get the 33rd or so pick next year in compensation for losing Lee, and that softens the blow of losing the prospects. Good luck with Aumont, Gilles, and Ramirez. You might even see Aumont in your pen this year. I'm more skeptical than most M's fans, but I get why they're excited too. Lee might not have the talent of Felix Hernandez, but he's an exceptional, professional pitcher who makes the team better immediately. |
|
1751 |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 5:40 pm
The value of Cliff LeeWe'll see if you say the same thing in September. Picks are good, but they are usually several years away from the majors, and they are like shooting in the dark. You gave up 3 picks for one year of Lee - that's the bottom line.
|
|
jbish425 |
Posted on: December 16, 2009 4:05 pm
The value of Cliff LeeThe Mariners definately made out well in this trade. Like you mentioned they ahve tremendous flexibility. I don't like the chances of the Mariners being able to re-sign him. Sure they have the money for it, but do they have the money for him and King Felix? I don't think so. And anyone who has half a brain knows that locking up King Felix long term is more important than Lee long term. But even if they keep Lee just for the year and he leaves via FA, he will most likely be a Type A free agent. I'd take 1 year of Lee, a first round and sandwhich pick in exchange for the prospects we gave up.
|


