Blog Entry

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

Posted on: September 19, 2010 9:23 pm
Edited on: September 20, 2010 6:03 pm
Three games back of the Phillies in the National League East, the best thing the Braves have going for them is six remaining head-to-head meetings with the Phils, starting with a series that begins Monday night at Citizens Bank Park.

Two and a half games ahead of the Padres in the NL wild-card race, the biggest thing the Braves have going against them is that they play six of their final 12 games against the league's best team -- the Phillies.

"It is tougher," Chipper Jones said. "But I don't think we'd want it any other way."

One reason, of course, is that the Braves would like to think that they can still win the East. To win the East now, they need for the Phillies to lose. The best way to guarantee that the Phillies lose is to beat them yourself.

The other reason is that the Braves actually have a winning record against the Phillies over the last two years. They went 10-8 last season, and they're 7-5 so far this year.

"The one thing we have done really well the last couple of years is play well against the Phillies," Jones said. "And we're going to have to. They're the best team in the National League, and for some reason, we get sky-high to play them.

"To beat them, we need to play a near-perfect game."

But to make the playoffs, the Braves don't need to finish ahead of the Phillies. They just need to win the wild card -- although that might necessitate beating the Phillies a few times.

"Now we can't split hairs," club president John Schuerholz said. "Now it's about getting to the playoffs."

But still, Schuerholz said he doesn't mind it that half of the Braves' remaining schedule features the Phils (with other six games against the Nationals and Marlins).

"It might be the energy level we need," he said. "They will be energized games."

And they're leading off this week's edition of 3 to watch (which doesn't include the Rangers, Twins or Reds, even though all three could clinch their divisions in the next few days:

1. The Phillies were easily able to adjust their rotation, so that the Braves will face Cole Hamels, Roy Halladay and Roy Oswalt, maybe the closest thing we've seen to a true Big Three since the days of Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine and John Smoltz. The Braves would have had a harder time making similar adjustments, and thus ace Tim Hudson won't pitch in this series. The Braves planned to start off with Jair Jurrjens, in Braves at Phillies, Monday night (7:05 ET) at Citizens Bank Park , but Jurrjens hurt his right knee in a bullpen session last Friday in New York. So 24-year-old Brandon Beachy, who was in Florida with the Braves' instructional league team, will get the start and make his major-league debut. Rookie Mike Minor and young Tommy Hanson are the other two Braves starters this week. The Phillies' Big Three would be lined up again to pitch in the final three regular-season games in Atlanta, although if the Phils have wrapped up the division by then, there's a chance they wouldn't all pitch.

2. Elsewhere on this site , I made what I thought was a reasoned but traditional case for Felix Hernandez as the American League's Cy Young leader. Hernandez could help his own case considerably with a big performance in Mariners at Blue Jays, Thursday afternoon (12:37 ET) at the Rogers Centre . The Jays have hit a major-league high 128 home runs in 69 home games (nearly two a game), and they average more than five runs a game at home. Hernandez hasn't faced the Blue Jays yet this year. Neither has CC Sabathia, who never lined up with any of the Yankees' first five series against the Jays (but figures to pitch in Toronto during the Yankees Sept. 27-29 visit).

3. First, Sabathia has a rematch with Tampa Bay's David Price, and if it's anything like their last game, it might be the 1 to watch this week. The first time around, a week ago in Florida, Sabathia and Price combined for 16 scoreless innings (eight apiece), while allowing just five hits (three of them off Price). They hook up again in Rays at Yankees, Thursday night (7:05 ET) at Yankee Stadium , and by the time it's over, we should have a better idea of who wins the American League East (and who's the AL wild card), and also of who is the leading threat to Hernandez's chance to win the Cy Young.


Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: February 20, 2012 9:43 am

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 14, 2012 9:06 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

All of us of course loved surfing around applying this furnish. Productive degree created by level clarifi cation!

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 30, 2011 11:48 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

We including your blog brought out actually presented i some kind of persistence for win for much good demonstration, therefore , protect typically the superb fill out.

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 5, 2011 3:58 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 9:28 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 4:42 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

Now i the same as this blog world wide web post. I am going to generally without doubt you should be peeping to barefoot on averag e.

Since: Oct 21, 2011
Posted on: October 22, 2011 8:49 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator

Since: Feb 3, 2009
Posted on: September 22, 2010 4:30 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

for a moment i would like all atlanta braves fans to reenter the real world and get a reality check... they are the greatest... underachievers of the past 20 years, don't sit there and tell me that 14 division titles, but only 1 world series title means otherwise... also please tell me how you waste Maddox, Smoltz and Glavine, in the prime of their careers... it's a disgrace how hyped bobby cox is as a manager considering his post season track record is horrendous, maybe he should worry less about getting thrown out of games for arguing and focus more on management... i understand his players love playing for him, but that's only b/c when they would underachieve at the end of their season he would pat them on the butt instead of lighting a fire under it... get real Atlanta, no decent sports town would take solice in all those division titles w/ out producing more than one 'chip... even if you finish second your still a loser

Since: Aug 15, 2007
Posted on: September 21, 2010 5:08 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

It's Baseball! the object is to WIN not suck. If you don't eexpect to win why are you a fan? Your one of those people who think everyone should have a trophy right?  You sound like it. Well we didn't expect to win so that makes us better.... Your an idiot.

Since: Feb 3, 2009
Posted on: September 21, 2010 12:44 pm

3 to watch: The Philly dilemma edition

the philies were terrible for the vast majority of those years... they never had any expectations, thus they didn't underachieve... whereas the braves would win the division and then get bumped by the wildcard (4 times), lost in the series (4) and only 1 win... definition of UNDERACHIEVMENT

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or