Blog Entry

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Posted on: April 22, 2011 10:01 am
Some Reds try to play down their new-found rivalry with the Cardinals.

"There's no extra significance at all," Jay Bruce told the Cincinnati Enquirer.

Oh yeah? Tell that to Brandon Phillips.

When the Reds' team plane landed in St. Louis on Thursday night, Phillips went straight to his Twitter account .

"Just landed in St. Louis! Sad face," he posted. "But these wins will make me happy!"

One hour later, he was at it again, saying he told teammates that the best thing to eat in St. Louis was Lunchables.

No extra significance?

How about those T-shirts they're selling in St. Louis , the ones that read "Mike Leake stole this shirt for me"?

Look, we know rivalries can be overblown. Most teams don't really hate each other as much as the fans would like them to. Players change teams. As Reds manager Dusty Baker told reporters Thursday, it's not like the Reds have anything against Lance Berkman or Ryan Theriot.

Besides that, the Cardinals and Reds know better than most teams that head-to-head meetings often don't decide division titles. The Cardinals won 12 of 18 games against the Reds in 2010 -- including six of the final seven -- and the Reds still won the National League Central.

But please don't tell me that these games have "no extra significance."

On to 3 to watch.

1. As we mentioned in the last 3 to watch, the Indians and Royals are on top of the American League Central -- right now. And one scout who just finished watching the White Sox said they "look uninspired" and "look like they're still going through spring training." Perhaps they'll look more inspired this weekend in Detroit, starting with White Sox at Tigers, Friday night (7:05 ET) at Comerica Park. Mark Buehrle (5-0 in his last eight starts against the Tigers) faces Justin Verlander (5-0 in his last five starts against the White Sox). It's the first Buehrle-Verlander matchup in more than three years, since an April 2008 meeting when the White Sox won, 13-2, in a game where Nick Swisher and Pudge Rodriguez were the two leadoff hitters.

2. Mike Leake won't be starting in this weekend's Reds-Cardinals series. Chris Carpenter will be. All he's done against the Reds is win each of his last 10 starts, dating back to 2006. Last year alone, Carpenter was 5-0 with a 1.78 ERA against the Reds. He goes against Travis Wood in Reds at Cardinals, Saturday afternoon (4:10 ET) at Busch Stadium. The Fox network even thought enough of the matchup to send its top crew (Guess the Yankees and Red Sox aren't playing this weekend). ESPN even noticed. "We haven't been on the Sunday night game in I don't know how long," Baker told the Enquirer.

3. Remember when John Lackey was the Angels' ace? Remember when it seemed like another black mark against Angels owner Arte Moreno that he allowed Lackey to leave as a free agent, the same winter the Angels tried but failed to trade for Roy Halladay? Now Jered Weaver and Dan Haren are a combined 9-0 with a 1.20 ERA, while Lackey carries a 9.82 ERA into his start in Red Sox at Angels, Sunday afternoon (3:35 ET) at Angel Stadium. That's not to say the Angels couldn't use more rotation depth. While Weaver and Haren are 9-0 (going into Haren's Friday night meeting with Jon Lester), the rest of the Angels pitchers are 3-7.


Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 14, 2012 2:12 pm

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

My husband and i in particular this web site launched and it is made available everybody some dedication to succeed for some precious reason, which means continue the specific superior fill in.

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 30, 2011 6:15 pm

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Considerable many thanks for just that business web page present.Indeed thanks! In reality Remarkable.

Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 23, 2011 3:23 pm

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Your world-wide-web web page rocks !. Thanks for rendering enough powerful subject material content. I may very well look for any ebsiteand may well be while not a doubt coming back again. Once again, I individually get pleasure from all of your current give excellent success and likewise supplying you with loads remarkable strategies for that visitors

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 5, 2011 9:11 am

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Fine to acquire visiting your web-site where when, many experts have the seasons for me. 100 % this is what disclosing where seems patiently lay on as a result massive.

Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 3:02 pm

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 10:47 am

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Irealised i was thought process it was eventually it follows that will be a total dull farther around in a long time action, perhaps Were completely happy All of us came upon. In your mind fine hand in an online squeeze page web page url to that may suggestion internet in my small rrnternet web. ,,,,, A service provider is actually ongoing a person's website page and . i've for a original key.Unique appearance being value more highly to safe! An individual will possibly even could very well in review my personal obtainable actual story in addition to reveal to mankind the perfect their understanding!

Since: Nov 27, 2011
Posted on: November 27, 2011 8:30 pm

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

Since: Jul 28, 2009
Posted on: April 23, 2011 11:58 am

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

I'm on the Reds side of this feud, but I will say they had prob start winning if they want to talk.  Right now the Cards have their number. 

Since: Mar 4, 2008
Posted on: April 23, 2011 9:52 am

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

That is a terrible thing to say.  You should be banned from ever posting again.

Since: Dec 22, 2006
Posted on: April 22, 2011 11:14 pm

3 to watch: The 'No extra significance' edition

no doubt about it

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or