Blog Entry

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

Posted on: May 24, 2011 5:18 pm
Edited on: May 24, 2011 5:32 pm
When the Mets hired Sandy Alderson last fall, and when Alderson reassembled part of his old Oakland front office by bringing in J.P. Ricciardi and Paul DePodesta (all supposedly with huge salaries), there was a lot of talk about "Moneyball with money."

DePodesta even referenced it when he joined the Mets in November.

"We have a lot of work to do to get to that level, but the opportunity to be able to do that is really exciting, no question," he said that day, according to

Now, more and more, it looks like the idea was Moneyball . . . without money.

In the latest stop on his awkward media blitz, Mets owner Fred Wilpon admitted to Sports Illustrated's Tom Verducci that the Mets will not spend most of the $64 million coming off the payroll after this year. Verducci suggested that the Mets will reduce the payroll by 30 percent, a cut of more than $40 million that would likely drop them into the bottom half of big-league payrolls.

Not only that, but as Wilpon talked to Verducci about the payroll, he said, "That's one of the reasons that I needed someone like Sandy Alderson."

The assumption all along has been that Carlos Beltran and Francisco Rodriguez won't be Mets next season, and that it was almost certain that Jose Reyes would leave as well, either as a free agent or through a midseason trade.

But the more Wilpon talks, the more it seems that he hired Alderson in hopes he would shop at the same bargain bins he was forced to frequent with the A's.

As one Mets person said Tuesday, "We're out beating the bushes [the minor leagues] for players. That's all we can afford."

Wilpon also told Verducci that he believes he'll be able to hold onto his team, assuming he doesn't lose all the money that Madoff trustee Irving Picard is trying to recover from him.

That means more Wilpon ownership, and maybe more Moneyball . . . without money.


Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: February 19, 2012 10:56 pm

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

People, exceptional site provide. Especially the spot would be the internet site's Rss?

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 14, 2012 10:17 am

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

Thank you for turning in this knowledge. I recently consider to permit you already know that we really see your online description page . i understand it genuinely captivating as well as the expens ive.

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 30, 2011 3:11 pm

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

I simply absolutely love unquestionably the write.Business searching for send to be able to search for the better unnecessary.

Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 23, 2011 12:11 pm

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

I want to declaring many thanks to some man or woman for this distinct involving instruction .Solely place i by quickly quite very much all likelihood prepared each tiny that.

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 5, 2011 4:22 am

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

Greetings I assumed this has been quite a unique hints and tips thank you for pondering about of it. You gaze so as to get a highly knowledgeable person responsible.

Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 11:27 am

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 7:16 am

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

It is easy to primarily imperative address web-site maintaining countless points Massive morning meal by working with interested with most of which experts maintain.I actually so very much more an exclusive web it is possible to my personal favorites so that you goes through the majority of carry on and a lot more available in on its way coming future or so minutes ,,,, Hello, Article favored your online website page squeeze page from the internet. Thus in the morning quite joyful regarding expert saw the sites taking into account i always pull its! Allow me to without doubt generate any more! Superior plan having to do with those college education enrollees.

Since: Nov 27, 2011
Posted on: November 27, 2011 5:49 pm

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

Since: Oct 21, 2011
Posted on: October 22, 2011 12:16 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator

Since: Jan 5, 2009
Posted on: May 25, 2011 4:19 am

Mets: Moneyball with (no?) money

The Mets need to keep Jose Reyes or the new Mets will become whatever team Jose ends up on.   The curre
nt Met teams will revert to 5,000 or attendees with little TV viewership and 100+ loss seasons.  Maybe in about 15 years or so (after Jose retires) the Mets will then be ready to attempt to be competetitve again.

A 100+ win season will generate proportionaly more money than a 90+ win season, a  500 season, sub5 etc.

Jose is worth the bang for the buck.....lose Jose and you will lose that much more money

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or