Blog Entry

A few names on waivers, and what it means

Posted on: August 24, 2011 4:07 pm
Edited on: August 24, 2011 8:18 pm
 
The Red Sox put Carl Crawford on trade waivers Wednesday, which means nothing.

The Reds put Ramon Hernandez on the wire, which could be more interesting.

The White Sox put John Danks, Gavin Floyd, Paul Konerko and Matt Thornton on, which may or may not mean anything.

The waiver process is theoretically secret and absolutely prone to misunderstanding and misinterpretation.

Dozens of players are placed on waivers every day during August. Quite a few are claimed. Very few are traded.

Does it mean anything that the Rockies were awarded a claim on Wandy Rodriguez, or that the Giants were reportedly awarded a claim on Heath Bell?

Possibly. Or it could turn out meaning absolutely nothing.

Here's an attempt to explain to make a strange and complicated process a little simpler:

1. After 4 p.m. ET on July 31, players can't be traded without waivers until after the end of the season.

2. During August, teams routinely place nearly every player on waivers. Some they'd love to trade. Some they wouldn't trade under any circumstances. Sometimes they want to gauge interest. Sometimes they put players they're obviously not going to trade (Crawford, for example) on the wire to disguise which players they don't want to see get claimed. Sometimes they want a player to clear, sometimes they'd rather he get claimed.

3. If no team claims a player, he is said to have cleared waivers and then can be traded without restriction.

4. If one team claims a player, the team that put the players on waivers has three options. It can work out a deal with the claiming team, or simply allow the claim to go through, or pull the player back off waivers. If he is pulled back, he is basically untradeable for the rest of the season. Teams sometimes allow claims to go through because they want to be rid of the contract, as happened when the White Sox got Alex Rios from the White Sox.

5. If multiple teams put in a claim, the claim is awarded to the team that was lowest in the standings on the day the player went on waivers. If the teams have the same record, then the tie-breaker is which team finished lower in the standings last year. Then the process is the same as above, with the team having three options.

6. Teams sometimes put in claims in an effort to "block" players from going to teams ahead of them in the standings. The risk is that the claim can go through and the team ends up with the player. But sometimes that even works out, as it did when the Giants "blocked" Cody Ross from going to the Padres last year.

7. The process is theoretically secret, with massive fines threatened for revealing any information. That's why no one is ever quoted on the record until a deal is done, and also why information leaks out in bits and pieces, if at all.

According to sources, the Rockies were awarded the claim on Rodriguez, and the teams have until 1 p.m. Thursday to work out a deal. But as of Wednesday night, it appeared those talks were basically dead, because the Astros put a considerably higher value on Rodriguez than the Rockies do (and weren't simply interested in dumping his large contract).

Also, according to sources, the Giants were awarded the claim on Bell. Those teams have until 1 p.m. Friday to work out a deal, and just as with Rodriguez, sources were suggesting that a deal is unlikely.

Jon Heyman of SI.com reported that the Yankees were awarded a claim on Cubs first baseman Carlos Pena. Those teams also have until 1 p.m. Friday to work out a deal.

Comments

Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: February 19, 2012 7:37 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

, thank you for that posting internet page.Industry looking to get forth to have masses increased. Interesting.



Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 14, 2012 12:06 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

Truly! Clearly exceptional put forward measured it then at Google . This valuable aricle is often very entertaining. Most people manifest to locate a quite experienced person blog writer Probably brand new to finally in operation your website


jhfgdters
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: January 12, 2012 7:59 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 30, 2011 5:45 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

Excellent weblog! We all most certainly cherish how it skilled assistance on my little view and the comprehending are quite effectually designed.



Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 23, 2011 2:27 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

Recognize it for building a huge quantity of a great articles substance! Searching to obtaining out about supplemental running a blog!



Since: Nov 19, 2011
Posted on: December 3, 2011 1:46 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

These are typically frequently spectacular ingredients or even a webpage articles, Allow me to to be honest appriciate your projects. ,,,, Which is little question pretty stirring apply you will be able have along with some of us. 1-2 many people really should recognise that imperative sectors could affect many people. You might like to proclaimed because of everyone the spin at last.


Tomly
Since: Oct 21, 2011
Posted on: October 21, 2011 4:51 pm
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Oct 7, 2011
Posted on: October 12, 2011 2:46 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

I have not checked in best suited right here for merely a smaller even though easily since I considered it had been acquiring monotonous, while in essence the best up-to-date posts are exceptional superior high quality i fully guess I will contain you oh no- my consistently bloglist



Since: Jan 5, 2009
Posted on: August 25, 2011 11:46 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

Thanks for this Danny, I've been watching baseball for ~40 years, and never really knew how the process worked.  Good stuff!!



Since: Jul 12, 2011
Posted on: August 25, 2011 7:00 am
 

A few names on waivers, and what it means

Carl Crawford is the Red Sox left fielder, not center fielder.  Good to know that you are able to predict the future based on one year.  I'll look at his entire career and make a guess that you are wrong, and he will bounce back next year if not in the playoffs this year.  Don't hate on Boston just because the Bruins ran your Canucks in the Cup finals. 


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com