Play Fantasy Use your Fantasy skills to win Cash Prizes. Join or start a league today. Play Now
 
Tag:Labor Talks
Posted on: March 10, 2011 5:18 pm
Edited on: March 10, 2011 5:24 pm
 

De Smith to update players by 2 PM Friday

Posted by Andy Benoit

The drop-dead time for the NFL and NFLPA ongoing labor negotiations is 5:00 p.m. EST Friday, March 11. But it sounds like we’ll have some news sometime around 2:00 p.m.

DeMaurice Smith tweeted early Thursday evening, “Players stay strong! Stay informed, update by 2pm tomorrow.”
NFL Labor

We're waiting with bated breath. (Seriously.)

2 PM, three hours before the CBA extension expires, would not be such an odd time if Smith were only updating the players. But by tweeting this news, Smith knows he’s not talking to just the players. Is an early update a sign that minimal progress is being made? Is it a sign of significant progress?

This is why we’re waiting with bated breath.


For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.

Posted on: March 10, 2011 4:48 pm
Edited on: March 10, 2011 5:14 pm
 

Liz Mullen of 'SBJ' talks latest labor news

Posted by Will Brinson
NFL Labor

For whatever reason, I've felt especially compelled to fire out podcasts this week, and, luckily, I've been able to land some pretty awesome guests. Add Liz Mullen of the Sports Business Journal to that list.

Liz joined the show Thursday afternoon to discuss the latest word on labor negotiations, whether the owners are going to open their books to the NFLPA, how the NFL labor situation differs from other leagues, and whether or not there's reason to be optimistic about the current state of negotiations.

Just hit the play button below and don't forget to Subscribe via iTunes.

If you can't view the podcast, click here to download .
Posted on: March 10, 2011 1:27 pm
 

Report: NFL, NFLPA financial gap under $700M

Posted by Will Brinson

Though there's some discord amongst owners about opening up the books, as our Mike Freeman reported Thursday, there's still apparently progress being made in the labor discussions between the NFL and NFLPA.

Per Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk, the two sides have gotten the revenue sharing gulf that separates them down to $700 million. That seems kind of pedantic, because it's a lot of money, but it does signify movement -- originally it began at $1 billion and was later reported to be around the $750-$800 million range.

Mark Maske of the Washington Post also reports that the number is "substantially" under the $700 million mark.

What makes this interesting is that earlier this week, the NFLPA said it wouldn't give up "$1 more" without some more financial transparency from the league.
NFL Labor

While the gap shortening doesn't necessarily preclude the NFLPA sitting tight, it does seem to indicate some sort of compromise, and probably means that the owners providing some information to the union at least helped shorten the gap.

Again, even if they're down to $500 million, there's still a huge gap between the two sides. But as the clock winds down on the deadline for mediation, seeing significant progress on one of the three major issues at least provides a glimmer of hope for those that don't want to see football played out in a courtroom.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
Posted on: March 10, 2011 9:55 am
 

Mike Freeman on labor, NFL owners opening books

Posted by Will Brinson
NFL Labor

New developments on the labor front? You betcha. (In this case, it's the union saying 18 games is out of question and then filing a motion to unlock the TV case records from Judge Doty's courtroom.)

So that means a new podcast, too. Mike Freeman, CBSSports.com national columnist, is on the horn this time to talk about whether or not there's reason for optimism in the labor talks, why the owners are refusing to open up the books, what a ruling in this television case could mean, and what to expect from the labor negotiations over the next two days.

Just hit the play button below and don't forget to Subscribe via iTunes.

If you can't view the podcast, click here to download .
Posted on: March 10, 2011 12:13 am
Edited on: March 10, 2011 12:18 am
 

Union asks Doty to unseal records in TV case

Posted by Will Brinson

Last week, Judge David Doty in Minnesota dropped a pretty big bombshell on the NFL, ruling that the league couldn't use nearly $4 billion in "lockout insurance" stemming from television contracts.

Doty's descriptive language in his ruling drew quite a bit of attention, particularly the part about DirecTV having to pay more if there was a work stoppage in 2011 than if there wasn't. And now the NFLPA has filed a motion to have Doty unseal the evidence and testimony from the proceedings in the broadcast revenues case.

"The NFL cannot be permitted to comment publicly about these proceedings and then turn around to embrace a cloak of confidentiality that thwarts the public’s right to know," union lawyers wrote in the memorandum. "The NFL Bears the burden of showing the need to keep the underlying record sealed. Despite the opportunity, no such showing has been made."

In its motion, the NFLPA also argued that the league hasn't explained why the records are sealed and is refusing to cooperate with the union's attempts to redact certain portions of the records in order to protect "third-party information" as it relates to broadcast partners.

NFL Labor

Clearly, this is an attempt to ramp up the public pressure on ownership as the deadline for mediation closes, but the NFL doesn't seem to be taking the bait immediately.

"We will respond to that filing in due course," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello told the Associated Press.

At some point, it seems likely that the NFL's records (financial, legal or otherwise) will see the light of day. And that'll likely either be voluntary or through the stage of legal discovery.

But with the sports-watching world genuinely concerned as to whether or not football will get played in 2011, withholding information that could lead to a settlement of the labor issues isn't doing the NFL any public relations favors.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
Posted on: March 9, 2011 8:21 pm
Edited on: March 9, 2011 8:33 pm
 

DeMaurice Smith on 18 games: 'We're not doing it'

Posted by Will Brinson

The labor discussions between the NFL and NFLPA center around three main points: revenue sharing, a rookie wage scale and an 18-game schedule. According to DeMaurice Smith, Executive Director for the Players Association, the schedule issue is no longer on the bargaining table.

That's what he told Jim Trotter of Sports Illustrated -- who recently appeared on our Eye on Football podcast -- Wednesday evening anyway.

"First of all, the league has never presented a formal proposal for 18 games," Smith said, per Trotter. "But more importantly, it's something that our players don't want. Eighteen games is not in the best interest of our players' safety, so we're not doing it."

There are two days worth of mediation remaining before the current CBA deadline expires, which makes these strong words indeed.

Smith, apparently, spoke to fans after Wednesday's mediation session adjourned, when he had some similarly strong comments about the owners' willingness to open their books.

"How much financial information would you want before you write a $5 billion check?" Smith asked following mediation.

NFL Labor

Provided that Smith and the union won't budge on this issue, and provided that the prior report about a tentative rookie-wage scale are accurate, negotiations between now and Friday could become quite interesting.

If those two issues are off the table, then negotiating a new CBA would come down to revenue sharing, and nothing else. If the owners will allow the union to stand fast by their stance on the schedule, it's conceivable that the union will cave some on the list of required financial documents. (Although the investment bank they hired for an audit may not let them, based on available information.)

On the other hand, this could just as easily lead to a full-on disintegration of any possible CBA discussion and prompt the Armageddon scenario that involves decertification and lots of lawsuits. Either way, the union has made its stance on schedule expansion clear, and they don't appear to be budging.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
Posted on: March 9, 2011 6:20 pm
Edited on: March 9, 2011 6:48 pm
 

Why owners don't want an antitrust suit

Posted by Will Brinson
NFL Labor

As everyone knows by now, the big sticking point in the NFL and NFLPA negotiations is revenue sharing, and it involves the owners opening up their books.

If the owners open up those books, they will be scrutinized by auditors for the union, which is something the owners don't want happening.

Worse than that, for the owners, is the possibility of the two sides getting involved in a court battle and having all those finances publicly splashed all over legal documents vis-a-vis testimony and/or discovery.

Want proof that will end poorly for the owners? How about recalling the last time it happened, in 1992, when Robert Noll, a Stanford University economics professor, testified that the NFL's $1.3 billion in revenue was "substantially understated."

Per an old-school New York Times article, the NFL reported operating profits at $163 million. However, Noll testified that such a number was "shielded from costs such as the $600,000 per team contributed to the World League of American Football and two antitrust lawsuits that are 'the costs of defending and maintaining a monopoly.'"

This was big news in 1992, obviously, but it wasn't the sort of news that got splashed all over Twitter or replayed 24/7 on every single sports-related television channel. That's because those things didn't exist as such back then. They do now, and such testimony, were it to become public, would be ugly news for the owners.

Oh yes, and there was the financial document showing that Norman Braman, Eagles owner at the time, paid himself a $7.5 million salary. Which wasn't counted as profit.  

Add in 20 years worth of inflation, and whatever gets reported should play just wonderfully with the press, especially with in this economic climate.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
Posted on: March 8, 2011 10:46 am
 

Feely: Doty ruling 'gave us a chance'

Posted by Mike Freeman

One of the smartest guys in this entire labor battle between the NFL and players is Arizona kicker Jay Feely. Few people on either side are capable of succinctly breaking down the issues with clarity as Feely.

He's a member of the union's executive committee and while there is little Feely can say about the negotiations now because of the sensitivity of the talks he did take time to explain in detail why the recent Judge David Doty ruling regarding the league's network TV deals -- which amounted to a $4 billion lockout slush fund for the owners -- was so critical.

Feely had just arrived in Washington on Tuesday morning when he spoke with CBSSports.com.

"With that lockout fund the owners basically had $4 billion in the bank and we had zero," said Feely. "They had such a massive financial advantage over us. The Doty ruling gave us a chance.

NFL Labor

"I've told people that basically it was like the real estate market. One person trying to buy a house has a lot of cash on hand and someone else doesn't. The other part of the ruling was the language Doty used. He stated the actions of the owners was egregious and an attempt to defraud the players.

"I think the next big thing is what the penalty will be. Doty hasn't decided yet."

That is critical and hasn't been talked about enough in the media. Doty could put that $4 billion pool in an escrow account for an entire year, give the players 59.6 percent of it or hold it until a deal is done. None of those options are good for certain owners like Danny Snyder who have gigantic stadium mortgage payments.

"I get what the NFL was trying to do from a business perspective," Feely said. "But it was still wrong and Doty's ruling showed it was wrong. Now we just want to get a deal done. Hopefully that can happen."

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsnfl on Twitter and subscribe to our RSS Feed.
 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com