Play Fantasy Use your Fantasy skills to win Cash Prizes. Join or start a league today. Play Now
 
Tag:Jason Terry
Posted on: May 18, 2011 5:17 pm
 

Perkins: I don't like Tyson Chandler

Posted by Royce Young



Prepare yourself for some shocking news: Kendrick Perkins does not like Tyson Chandler.

It only took a couple minutes for Perkins to scuffle with his new adversary Chandler. The two tangled in the first quarter just 70 seconds into the game, both picking up technical fouls.

Perkins has always said he preps himself mentally by thinking of reasons to hate his opponent. Evidently he hasn’t had to do much thinking with Chandler. Because Perk flat out doesn’t like him. Via ESPN Dallas:

“Me and Tyson never got along. I’m serious,” said Perkins. “He don’t like me, I don’t like him and that’s pretty much how it’s been. Everybody always looks at me as kind of like a dirty player if you’re on the opposite team, but he’s just as dirty as anybody else.”

Chandler said he has no issue with Perkins.

“I have nothing against him,” Chandler said of Perkins. “He won a championship with the Boston Celtics, and that’s where I’m trying to take my team. I mean, I’ve got respect for him, what he was able to accomplish. But all the chippy stuff, the after-the-ball stuff, that’s all nonsense and I’m not going to get involved with it.”

As Russ Bengtson tweeted, the bigger news would probably be if Perk DID like Chandler.

Perkins does need to keep it in check though. He has four technical fouls this postseason and three more and he has to serve a one-game suspension. With each game this Dallas series goes, the more chances Perk with scuffle with Chandler. Because if Perk don’t like you, he’s going to let you know about it.

Posted on: May 18, 2011 2:19 am
 

Dirk Nowitzki and the power of efficiency

Sometimes efficiency really is the difference. In Game of Mavericks vs. Thunder, Dirk Nowitzki and his dominating efficiency was the difference. 

Posted by Matt Moore




This wasn't a crazy fast game. There were 91 estimated possessions, which just isn't a lot. It's not an abysmal amount, it's just below the season average for NBA teams. In short, in a game where every possession was crucial, Dirk Nowitzki made the most of his. Every single one, just about.

48 points on 15 shots and 24 free throws. Three misses, combined. Dirk Nowitzki shot a basketball 39 times and missed thrice. It was an other-wordly performance. It was the stuff of legend. And Dallas needed every single bit of net Nowitzki earned. The Thunder will have to focus on how Dirk Nowitzki can't possibly duplicate that performance. The Mavericks will counter how the Thunder can't rely on Kevin Durant scoring 40 each game. The Thunder will reply that Jose Juan Barea isn't likely to continue to play at that level, and the Mavericks will suggest the Thunder ask the Lakers about that. The Thunder have Russell Westbrook's struggles. The Mavericks have Peja Stojakovic and Jason Kidd going 2-9 combined. The list goes on.

But through it all is this. When the Mavericks needed him, Dirk Nowitzki gave the Mavericks exactly what was called for: A nearly flawless game. The Thunder want to continue going one-on-one with Nowitzki, putting players like Thabo Sefolosha and James Harden on him? There's no reason he can't amass 24 free throws per game, or score 50. The Thunder made a decision not to double. It was a not a winning strategy, because Nowitzki is not any other player. He is one of the best offensive players this league has ever known. 

So much of the playoffs depend on matchups. I chose Oklahoma City in six for my prediction, based largely on those matchups, and I feel largely the same about them a game later. But there are players that transcend matchups, who are their own universe of inequality in terms of capability against their opponent. Durant is such a player, when he's truly in his finest form. But Nowitzki was just a little bit better Tuesday night. And that was because of his efficiency. Durant was good in that area, too, scoring 40 on 18 shots, missing only eight. His three turnovers were just one worse than Nowitzki's two. But that difference was very much the game. Nowitzki responded to what his team needed.  

But more than that is the fact that the Mavericks could count on points when Nowitzki touched the ball. It wasn't an opportunity or a good chance, it was a near certainty. "Give this guy the ball, he'll get points." At the most basic level of basketball, it was the very definition of success. When Nowitzki touched the ball, he failed only twice, missed only three times. There are a lot of questions about whether efficiency is really as valuable as some make it out to be.

In Game 1, it was very much the difference between a win and a loss for the Mavericks.

Game 2 is Thursday.  
Posted on: May 18, 2011 1:24 am
Edited on: May 18, 2011 2:05 am
 

The Thunder gets Dirk'd but it's not all bad

Posted by Royce Young



After Dirk Nowitzki started the game 6-6 from the floor, you knew it was a bad sign for the Thunder. The main objective and main fear for Thunder fans was the impossible matchup Dirk presented.

Oklahoma City tried a little bit of everything. Serge Ibaka. Nick Collison. Kevin Durant. Even 6-7 shooting guard Thabo Sefolosha took a spin on Dirk for a few possessions. When Nate Robinson came to the scorer's table to check in to start the fourth, I thought, "Man, Scott Brooks is really desperate. He's willing to try anything on Dirk."

But it was just that type of night. And by "that type of night" I mean a historic playoff night for Dirk. He finished with 48 on only 15 shots (that's 3.2 per attempt) and went 24-24 from the free throw line, which is an NBA record. The Mavs had an offensive efficiency of 130.1, shot 54 percent and got 53 points from their bench. By almost every indication, they whipped the Thunder in Game 1, right?

Wrong.

Oklahoma City was never entirely in the game, but with four minutes left, the Thunder were down just five. A single stop and a basket and OKC would've been right in the game.

The Thunder stayed close because Kevin Durant was terrific (40 points on 10-18 shooting) and the team went to the free throw line a ton (37-43). But despite the Mavs playing what felt like a near perfect game, OKC was right there. And this is without Russell Westbrook -- the Thunder's second best player -- playing a good game at all. Westbrook was just 3-15 from the floor, but did score 20 points thanks to a 14-18 effort at the line.

“I could bet my whole house that Russell Westbrook won’t go 3-15 again,” Durant said after the game. “You can quote me on that.”

Tyson Chandler had a lot to do with that the way he patrolled the rim, but Westbrook is normally better at finishing there. He struggled in Game 1 against Memphis much the same way, but I never thought Westbrook was doing anything to shoot the Thunder out of it or anything. So if you want a reason to be encouraged, I’d say the Thunder’s second best scorer went 3-15 from the floor, Dirk had a historic night and OKC was a stop or two away from having a shot.

Not completely bad, right?

If you're a Thunder fan, you have reason to feel a slight tinge of encouragment after the Game 1 loss. OKC outscored the Mavs in two quarters and held a 27-20 lead after the first. Really what doomed the Thunder was a poor second quarter in which Dallas outscored the Thunder 35-21. Take that away and OKC is completely in the game every step of the way.

It doesn't seem like Dirk will be able to duplicate this sort of game again. The Thunder should do better on him. Maybe he doesn't get to the line 24 times again. Whatever the case, percentages say the Mavs will come back to Earth a bit.

The Thunder just have to regroup a bit and readjust. Come up with a bit better plan for Dirk and try and limit some of the open jumpshooting the Mavs had. I actually am mildly encouraged despite the loss. Being down 0-1 isn’t good and isn’t ideal and it means there’s more pressure for Game 2. But if there’s anything this Thunder team does very well, it’s bounce back.
Posted on: May 18, 2011 1:13 am
 

Andrew Bynum congratulates J.J. Barea for Game 1

Los Angeles Lakers center Andrew Bynum congratulated Dallas Mavericks guard J.J. Barea on his performance in Game 1 of the Western Conferencebarea-fist finals. Posted by Ben Golliver.

The most memorable moment of the 2011 NBA playoffs so far has been either Miami Heat forward LeBron James kneeling to stop and celebrate a second round series victory or Los Angeles Lakers center Andrew Bynum absolutely decking J.J. Barea in the dirtiest play in recent memory.  

Bynum finally apologized and then was fined and suspended. We all thought that was the end of it. Not so.

On Tuesday night, the Dallas Mavericks defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder 121-112 in Game 1 of the Western Conference finals thanks in part to 21 points off the bench from Barea.

Following the game, Bynum took to Twitter to shout out some congratulations to his hit victim: "JJ Barea has a great story, worked his butt off and now killing on the big stage! Congrats you deserve it!"

Barea was once again masterful off the dribble, breaking down Oklahoma City's defense and living in the paint. 

It's funny how perspective can so radically alter someone's opinion. When Barea is bearing down on you, twisting and turning towards the hoop, he's one of the most annoying and frustrating things in the entire world. But when he's doing it to someone else? Hey, it's a "great story" that we can all sit back and enjoy.

Here's video of Bynum's hit again in case you missed it. 



Posted on: May 17, 2011 4:49 pm
Edited on: May 17, 2011 7:57 pm
 

LiveChat: NBA Lottery and WC Finals Game 1

Join us at 8PM EST as we chat about the NBA lottery, and then Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Dallas Mavericks

Franchise fortunes could alter forever and one team will get a game up in the chase for the Western Finals spot. We're so excited we could spit. Not on you. We like you too much.

The fun starts at 8PM EST here on Eye on Basketball.


 
Posted on: May 17, 2011 4:37 pm
Edited on: May 17, 2011 4:39 pm
 

Stevenson to guard Westbrook, Marion on Durant

Posted by Royce Young

For all the talk there has been about Russell Westbrook, he certainly makes opponents adjust. Last playoffs, Kobe Bryant took over the duty of checking Westbrook from Derek Fisher. This playoff season, the Nuggets attempted to use a few different defenders on Westbrook and the Grizzlies switched O.J. Mayo to him.

And the Mavericks, will continue the trend.

Via ESPN Dallas, shooting guard DeShawn Stevenson will get the starting defensive assignment on Westbrook over point guard Jaosn Kidd. And as expected, Shawn Marion will start on Kevin Durant.

A lot has been made about Kidd's age and the fact Westbrook is extremely fast and athletic, so Rick Carlisle is just going to move Kidd over. It's something the Mavs have done with Kidd a lot this season. They try to sort of hide Kidd on a shooting guard who most times isn't as speedy as a point man. I say "hide" but for instance, Kidd guarded Kobe in the Laker series just because it was a solid matchup.

The Grizzlies made the adjustment to put Mike Conley on Thabo Sefolosha and Mayo in the starting five on Westbrook in the second half of Game 4. Since that happened, the Thunder were a +49 with sixth man James Harden on the floor and a -23 with Sefolosha on the floor. Obviously, the Mavs are hoping to cash in on a similar result.

Which is why Harden is so important to the Thunder and why a lot of OKC fans have been calling for Harden to start. It won't happen as Scott Brooks is extremely stubborn on keeping consistency with his lineups and rotations. But bringing Harden in forces the Mavs to re-adjust. The difference in this series from the Grizzly one is that Jason Terry is a similar bench player for Dallas. The question is, once Terry comes in, who guards Westbrook then? Is it Kidd, or Terry?

This series will likely be heavy on the coaching chess match between Carlisle and Brooks. The Thunder can go small with Durant at the 4, but will they? And if they do, how does Dallas match it? There are about 50 of these questions to be asked here.

What's obvious is that Dallas is concerned with Westbrook's size and speed and wants to use a bigger, more athletic guard on him. Marion on the other hand didn't guard Durant all that much during the regular season (according to Synergy Sports, Marion defended Durant on only nine of the 48 shot attempts KD took in half-court sets). I would think Corey Brewer could be dusted off to guard Durant some, but Carlisle seems hesitant to sacrafice offense for defense.

Like I said, this series is full of matchups and decisions. It's going to be a good one.
Posted on: May 16, 2011 7:41 pm
 

What's At Stake: Dirk Nowitzki

What's at stake for Dallas Mavericks forward Dirk Nowitzki in the Western Conference finals? Posted by Ben Golliver.



There's plenty at stake over the next month for Dallas Mavericks forward Dirk Nowitzki, but not much of it it comes in the Western Conference finals. This series is big, but it's mostly a stepping stone.

Nowitzki's list of accomplishments is a mile long and growing, his place as a first-ballot Hall of Famer is secure. 10 All-Star teams. 11 All-NBA selections. An MVP award. He might still be overlooked and underrated by the general public after all that, but nothing could be further from the truth when it comes to his peers. "Unguardable." "Toughest cover in the league." "The best shooting big man ever." Those are just a few of the tags hung on Nowitzki by the players and coaches tasked with stopping him.

Obviously, the major tag that has eluded Nowitzki is "NBA Champion." 

To reach the NBA Finals for the second time in his career, Nowitzki will need to get through the Oklahoma City Thunder, a tough but certainly not insurmountable task. The Mavericks are more experienced, more tested, more rested and owners of home court advantage. Las Vegas and a vast majority of NBA experts agree: Dirk's Dallas squad is the clear favorite. In this light, Nowitzki has more to lose in the Western Conference finals than he has to gain.

Much like LeBron James, Nowitzki seems on the cusp of reorienting his reputation. Derided as a soft big man on a team that excelled in the regular season and flaked out in the playoffs, Dallas' storm through the Portland Trail Blazers and Los Angeles Lakers has begun to rewrite that narrative. Against L.A., he was unquestionably the best player on the court. In averaging 25.3 points and 9.3 rebounds in four straight wins, Nowitzki was better even than Kobe Bryant, the league's premier name for the last decade. His turnaround jumpers and to-the-basket leaners were equally indefensible, and his work on the defensive boards contributed to L.A.'s offensive struggles and overall frustration. His play-making and understanding of the team offense were divine. What Nowitzki lacks in traditional highlight reel fodder he makes up for in intelligent basketball plays.

If the Thunder pull the upset, though, Nowitzki returns to being merely excellent rather than transcendent. He goes back to being "one of the best of his time" rather than "one of the best of all time." The questions about his defense and toughness eventually creep back up. He'd be right back where he started this season, more or less. A consistently amazing force that never got over the top. Time doesn't treat players stuck in that situation nearly as well as it treats champions, and surely Nowitzki is aware of that.

Sadly, putting down the Thunder won't score Nowitzki a lot of new points either. Oklahoma City's big men -- Serge Ibaka, Nick Collison etc. -- are historically anonymous and not all that well equipped to defend him. This won't be a series featuring reputation enhancing one-on-one, back-and-forth action. There's nothing he can do against Oklahoma City that he hasn't already done for a decade. This is a man that has averaged more than 25 points per game over 11 playoff runs. If there's a way to score on you, a way to beat you, Nowitzki has done it. He just hasn't done it four times in seven games on the biggest stage.

And that's what is at stake for Nowitzki against Oklahoma City: one gigantic opportunity. A second crack at an NBA title. Considering the circumstances surrounding his first title shot, that second chance would be career redefining. In 2006, Nowitzki and the Mavericks climbed out to a 2-0 lead in the NBA Finals over the Miami Heat, only to collapse in four straight games amid controversial calls and a parade of Dwyane Wade free throws. Winning a title this season wouldn't erase those memories but it would certainly recast Nowitzki as a world champion before all else.

Given that Dallas has the oldest team in the NBA, a similar opportunity in the future is no guarantee. At age 32, with the aging cast surrounding him, what's at stake for Nowitzki over the next month is his legacy. In that, the Western Conference finals is just the prelude.
Posted on: May 16, 2011 6:50 pm
 

What's at Stake: Russell Westbrook

Posted by Royce Young



A 22-year-old third-year point guard playing in his second postseason ever -- there should be a little leeway for him, right?

Wrong. Very wrong.

In Russell Westbrook's world, the microscope zeroed in on him so hard that during the Thunder's seven-game series win over the Grizzlies, almost every shot he took -- even the good ones -- we critiqued and criticized.

It's true. His usage is up, he's taking more shots than usual, his assists are down and in critical moments, he tended to call his own number over his superstar teammate, Kevin Durant.

But as Westbrook proved with his downright spectacular triple-double in Game 7 versus Memphis, he's completely capable of still being the All-Star point man he was this season. Don't forget: Westbrook had a season almost entirely comparable to MVP Derrick Rose's. It's just when the postseason lights came on, everyone expected him to change or something. Everyone expected him to forget that he's the Thunder's second best scorer and one of the 10 best in the league. Everyone wanted him to be something he's not.

Westbrook though, never wavered. He stood firm, kept playing his game and as he said after Game 7, wasn't about to care what "you guys" had to say. ("You guys" being the media, of course.) It's funny because most looked at Westbrook's Game 7 and used it to slap a backhand compliment on him. See, play like that!

But really, I'm not sure Westbrook played all that much different. I've always maintained that when you're open, Russell Westbrook will find you. And that was what the Thunder's young point guard was working with in Game 7 -- open teammates. Scott Brooks made a slight adjustment to get more weakside action going with some good pick-and-roll stuff with Durant. It opened up more movement, more screening and more good looks. Westbrook took 14 shots and and made just four, but was universally praised for his game.

Here's the thing though: The Thunder needs that Westbrook for sure against Dallas, but they also need the one that's a threat to score 20 points. Oklahoma City's not advancing without Westbrook scoring the ball some. The Thunder didn't win 55 games and get this far with Westbrook doing his best Rajon Rondo impression. He's a score-first point man and that's the guy the Thunder ride, and die, with.

Westbrook took most of the criticism in stride, never lashing out. His teammates defended him, his coach backed him up, but Westbrook did what he always does -- played his game. Both on floor and off. Against the Mavericks, I have no doubt that there will be more ups and downs. Westbrook absolutely will not play a perfect series against the Mavericks. If he does, pencil the Thunder into The Finals.

There will be good nights and some nights that provoke discussion. It's the Russell Westbrook Way. But if he plays well at least four times -- whether it be scoring the ball or dropping triple-doubles -- the Thunder can, and likely will, advance past Dallas. A lot with the Thunder starts with Westbrook, and very well could end there too.
 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com