Tag:Loyola
Posted on: November 26, 2008 2:41 pm
 

Dear Gary (on stupidity in college basketball)

Here's Wednesday's Dear Gary ...
 
Dear Gary: Have we seen this season -- with one team intentionally fouling in the Arizona game when it was tied and (another) double-teaming one guy every play and losing by 30 -- the two stupidest plays since Chris Webber called a timeout in the national title game?

-- Joe

Not sure, Joe.

But I can tell you this: Yes, those were two pretty stupid plays/decisions, and the second (i.e., most recent) was worse.

The first so-called stupid play was Jamelle Horne's crazy run and lunge and foul with 0.8 second left that allowed UAB to break a tie and win a game that advanced the Blazers to tonight's showdown with Oklahoma. So that was stupid, sure. But that was just a player getting confused in the heat of the moment, and that kind of stuff happens, and what can you do?

The second source of stupidity is inexcusable, because what we had Tuesday night was a coach (Loyola's Jimmy Patsos) opting to lose by 30 just to try to shutdown Stephen Curry, which was an embarrassment to the Greyhounds. Remember, this is the same coach who spent part of an earlier game in the stands and/or at the end of the bench after receiving a technical foul, so bizarre is his middle name. And just so we're clear, I'm fine with bizarre gameplans as long as they are designed to help a team compete or win. But that's not what this was. Patsos used a strategy that had his team down 22 at the half, and he never altered it because he was more concerned with suffocating Curry than trying to compete. That's incomprehensible and inexcusable, and so if you want to call him stupid (and myopic and bone-headed), trust me, I won't stand in your way.

Posted on: November 26, 2008 6:56 am
Edited on: November 26, 2008 7:02 am
 

Loyola coach should be embarrassed, ashamed

I've never been a basketball coach.

Let me preface this with that.

But everything I know tells me the top priority when it comes to coaching should be to win or at the very least stay competitive, which is what makes Jimmy Patsos' decision to double-team Stephen Curry pretty much every minute of Tuesday's game (even when he didn't have the ball) one of the most bizarre sights I've ever seen. I mean, seriously, the whole thing was a joke, and that Patsos let his Loyola Greyhounds lose 78-48 to Davidson while basically playing three-on-four is an embarrassment to his profession, program and the players he supposedly coaches.

Sure, Loyola held Curry to three shots and no points.

That's great.

But if such an achievement comes at the expense of a 30-point loss then it's stupid, and Patsos didn't help himself in the post-game press conference when he explained his rationale and essentially acknowledged that he was more interested in not letting Curry play than he was in actually trying to win.

"Anybody else ever hold him scoreless?" Patsos asked. "I'm a history major. (Are people) going to remember that we held him scoreless or (that) we lost by 30?"

Actually, they'll remember neither, Jimmy.

What people will remember is the putz who let his team get embarrassed to prove a point that had no point.

 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com