Posted on: February 18, 2008 5:43 pm
Edited on: February 18, 2008 8:13 pm
Wisconsin belongs between Purdue and Indiana.
If you voted differently this week you voted wrong this week.
And I'll explain why in the Poll Attacks ... right after I destroy the credentials of Kent State and Cornell
AP poll: Kent State and Cornell got votes this week. That's proof that voters are either dumb or being different for the sake of being different (or dumb) because Kent State and Cornell -- scrappy as they might be -- belong nowhere near anybody's Top 25 ballot. A team shouldn't be capable of getting votes if it still doesn't have any good wins in the middle of February unless it also doesn't have any bad losses. In fact, I'm going to add that to the official Gary Parrish Rules of Voting Memo I plan to send to all AP voters next October so I can stop spending every Monday exposing flaws.
Frankly, I get bored doing this every week.
It's not even fun anymore.
Anyway, back to Kent State and Cornell.
Kent State is 21-5 overall, and I understand why that might look nice at first glance. But 15 of those 21 victories have come against teams ranked outside the Top 100 at CollegeRPI.com while 10 have come against teams ranked outside the Top 200. Put another way, that's a 21-5 record against a schedule ranked 153rd nationally, and it features no Top 50 wins and two losses to opponents ranked 195th or worse (No. 197 Toledo and No. 286 Detroit). The Golden Flashes have only played two Top 50 opponents. They lost to North Carolina by 29 points and to Xavier by 13 points. And that's why Kent State shouldn't be getting the three points it got in this week's AP poll from the Idaho Statesman's Nick Jezierny.
(If that name sounds familiar it's because Nick is the same voter I Poll Attacked last week. I'm sure Nick is a swell guy. But he might be the worst voter in America. Not only does he have Kent State at No. 23, but he has Butler two spots ahead of North Carolina and three spots ahead of UCLA. I love Butler, but that's ridiculous. And Nick, if you're reading this, you're on your way to induction into the Poll Attack Hall of Fame.)
Cornell's body of work is similarly unimpressive.
Cornell is 16-5 overall, and I understand why that might look nice at first glance. But 15 of those 16 victories have come against teams ranked outside the Top 100 at CollegeRPI.com while 10 have come against teams ranked outside the Top 200. Put another way, that's a 16-5 record against a schedule ranked 237th nationally, and it features no Top 50 wins and two losses to opponents ranked 195th or worse (No. 198 Colgate and No. 208 Bucknell). The Big Red have only played two Top 50 opponents. They lost to Duke by 14 points and to Syracuse by 16 points. And that's why Cornell shouldn't be getting the one point it got in this week's AP poll from The Washington Post's John Feinstein.
(If that name sounds familiar it's because John is ... ah, you know who John is. He's a brilliant author, a living Legend and a gift from God for the Poll Attacks.)
Coaches poll: No team in the Top 25 of this silly poll has a losing record against the Top 100 at CollegeRPI.com except Wisconsin (3-4 against the Top 100). Yet somehow the Badgers are 10th in the coaches poll -- ahead of such schools as Xavier (10-4 against the Top 100), Connecticut (9-5 against the Top 100) and Stanford (9-4 against the Top 100).
Also ranked below the Badgers: Purdue.
And that's the one that really doesn't make sense.
The Boilermakers are 5-3 against the Top 100, the winners of 11 consecutive games and occupiers of the top spot in the Big Ten standings. If that's not enough, voters should also know that Purdue has beaten Wisconsin -- not once but twice.
1/26/08 (at Purdue): Boilermakers 60, Badgers 56.
2/9/08 (at Wisconsin): Boilermakers 72, Badgers 67.
To be clear, I don't mind Wisconsin being ranked; I like the team a lot, particularly how it owns two wins over Indiana. But it's difficult to make sense of the Badgers being 10th in the coaches poll when the only smart thing to do is to have them somewhere between Purdue and Indiana -- which is why I had Wisconsin at No. 15 in my Top 25 (and one) -- four spots below No. 11 Purdue and one spot ahead of No. 16 Indiana.
Posted on: February 18, 2008 10:12 am
Edited on: February 18, 2008 8:14 pm
Wake Forest got a huge win.
Kevin Love had a (somewhat) huge game.
Here's Monday morning's edition of What You Need To Know.
Notable game from Sunday: Dino Gaudio got the biggest win of his career, an 86-63 victory over No. 2 Duke that led to a storming of the court. It was nice to see, particularly for a program that has endured tragedy with the death of Skip Prosser. And the byproduct is that it should shoot Tennessee to second in Monday's AP poll, meaning Saturday's game at FedExForum between Memphis and Tennessee will be a No. 1 vs. No. 2 showdown.
Notable performance from Sunday: Kevin Love sank a pair of 3-pointers and finished with 13 points and 11 rebounds to lead UCLA to a 56-46 victory over crosstown rival Southern California. The freshman center has scored in double-figures every game this season while recording 15 double-doubles for the Pac-10-leading Bruins.
Notable game scheduled for Monday: Two of the top three teams in the Atlantic 10 will get together when Xavier plays at Rhode Island. The Musketeers are 21-4 overall, 9-1 in the league. The Rams are 20-5 overall, 6-4 in the league. Tip-off is set for 7 p.m. ET.
Posted on: February 17, 2008 10:15 pm
Edited on: February 18, 2008 8:14 pm
Thank you, Wake Forest.
By beating Duke late Sunday you managed to make next weekend's showdown bigger than it was already going to be, and it was already going to be super huge. Now, it's going to be super duper huge. Because barring some voting irregularities the top two teams in the rankings will meet Saturday at FedExForum.
It should be No. 1 Memphis vs. No. 2 Tennessee.
It should be two rivals with a combined record of 48-2.
It should be no wonder that the asking price for courtside seats is up to $10,000 each.
Posted on: February 16, 2008 9:54 pm
Edited on: February 17, 2008 6:49 pm
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. -- I finished at Butler and made the drive south to Assembly Hall, where I'm now soaking up an atmosphere that is awkward by any standards. Yes, Kelvin Sampson was booed during introductions. He looked like a man who knows the end is near, but that's not why I'm writing.
I'll get to Sampson in a column to come later.
What I wanted to tell you now is that while researching my Butler column -- click this link to check it out -- I learned there are only six Top 25 teams that have a higher winning percentage against Top 100 opponents than Butler. I listed the teams in the column, but didn't provide the statistics. So if you're interested, here are the statistics ...
The point remains the same.
And now I'm gonna get back to watching Kelvin Sampson.
Late breaking RPI update (Part II): Bradley's RPI shot to 103 this morning. So now Drake and Butler are both 6-2 against the Top 100. Meantime, Saint Mary's is now 7-2 against the Top 100 (because Fullerton rose to No. 95 this morning), which means I'm finally gonna have to give in tonight and rank Saint Mary's in the Top 25 (and one). Can't justify believing in Butler based on this statistic if I don't also believe in Saint Mary's, can I?
Posted on: February 16, 2008 12:12 am
INDIANAPOLIS -- The return of Levance Fields to Pitt went about like the return of Tito Trinidad to Madison Square Garden.
Or the return of Britney Spears to the MTV Video Music Awards.
Or the return of ... ah, you get the point.
It didn't go well.
Not well at all.
And the byproduct was Friday night's 72-54 loss at Marquette that ruined Fields' first game back since breaking his foot in a Dec. 29 loss at Dayton. The junior point guard had missed 12 contests in between Dayton and Marquette. Pitt went 8-4 in that span, which was respectable if not impressive. But Fields clanked 6-of-7 shots in his return to finish with four points and as many turnovers as assists (two each) in 20 minutes.
Again, not well at all.
And things aren't getting any easier because Pitt's next game is at 20th-ranked Notre Dame on Thursday.
As for me, I'm in the Hoosier State -- a place where lying about phone calls will apparently cost you your job.
First it's Cleveland State at Butler on Saturday afternoon.
Then it's Michigan State at Indiana on Saturday night.
So in a matter of hours I'll see a Top 10 team (Butler) host a game in Hinkle Fieldhouse and a Top 10 program (Indiana) play a game for a coach who is on his way to forced unemployment. Crazy, huh? But either way, it should be a fun Saturday. And by fun, I mean strange.
Posted on: February 15, 2008 6:01 am
Arizona State upset Stanford.
Tyrese Rice got 32 against N.C. State.
Here's Friday morning's edition of What You Need To Know.
Notable game from Thursday: Arizona State improved to 4-0 in overtime games with a 72-68 upset of seventh-ranked Stanford. The Sun Devils trailed by seven points with 1:49 remaining in regulation but rallied behind freshman star James Harden (23 points, five rebounds and five assists) to earn their third win over a ranked opponent in two years under Herb Sendek. "A lot of guys don't like to play OTs," ASU's Jeff Pendergraph told reporters afterward. "We love it."
Notable performance from Thursday: Tyrese Rice made 12-of-18 shots -- including 3-of-6 3-point attempts -- to finish with 32 points, six assists and four rebounds in Boston College's 82-65 thrashing of North Carolina State. It was the kind of effort that sent the Wolfpack to the wrong side of the NCAA Tournament bubble, and at this point the ACC seems like a four-bid league. Meantime, Rice is averaging 30 points and 6.5 assists in his past two outings.
Notable game scheduled for Friday: There's no need to wait until Saturday to get your college basketball fix this weekend considering No. 22 Pittsburgh will visit Marquette on Friday night in a contest expected to mark the return of Pitt point guard Levance Fields. A 5-foot-10 junior, Fields hasn't played since breaking a bone in his left foot during an 80-55 loss at Dayton on Dec. 29. The Panthers managed to go 8-4 in his absence, impressive given the nature of the Big East. And if they can win at Marquette they will clinch their seventh consecutive 20-win season, though it's worth noting Pitt has lost three straight trips to Marquette since a 24-18 win in 1930. Tip-off is scheduled for 9 p.m. ET.
Posted on: February 14, 2008 12:49 am
Drake finally took a loss.
Pat Knight finally notched a win.
Here's Thursday morning's edition of What You Need To Know.
Notable game from Wednesday: Drake isn't going undefeated in the Missouri Valley Conference, not after that 65-62 loss at Southern Illinois that snapped the 14th-ranked Bulldogs' 21-game winning streak. Randal Falker had 13 points and 10 rebounds for SIU, which is now 13-12 overall and 8-6 in the MVC. Meantime, Drake is 22-2 overall, 13-1 in the league and still one victory away from clinching its first conference title in 37 years.
Notable performance from Wednesday: Alan Voskuil hit 9-of-14 shots (including 7-of-9 3-point attempts) to finish with 30 points and six rebounds in Texas Tech's 84-75 victory over 18th-ranked Kansas State. The 6-foot-3 junior has scored at least 14 points in three straight games and his latest effort helped Pat Knight get his first career victory while Bob Knight sat in the crowd and seemed slightly emotional when the final buzzer sounded. Honestly, it was a sweet little moment. And now Pat is merely 901 victories away from tying his father on the all-time wins list.
Notable game scheduled for Thursday: The surprise of the Pac-10 will be on display when Stanford visits Arizona State. The Cardinal is ranked seventh in the nation thanks to a 20-3 overall record that includes a 9-2 mark in the league. Arizona State is 15-7 overall, 5-5 in the Pac-10 and coming off a 59-54 victory at Arizona that snapped a five-game losing streak. Tip-off is set for 10:30 p.m. ET.
Posted on: February 13, 2008 11:11 am
The NCAA thinks Kelvin Sampson broke rules and lied when asked for an explanation.
Funny, that's the same thing I thought ... four months ago.
Here's my blog entry from last Oct. 16, the day after it was revealed Sampson acknowledged being on three-way calls with prospects and an assistant but denied he understood he was on three-way calls with prospects and an assistant.
CINCINNATI -- On a Monday drive from Lexington to Cincinnati I spent time talking to multiple basketball coaches. Naturally, Kelvin Sampson was a subject of conversation, and all I can tell you is that -- take this for what it's worth -- I couldn't find a single person in the business who believes it's possible that Sampson could've been on those three-way calls (that are OK by NCAA standards but weren't OK under Sampson's sanctions) with an assistant and recruit without knowing.
Of course, this is what Sampson claimed Sunday.
His phone would ring. He would answer it. A recruit would start talking. His assistant (Rob Senderoff) would stay quiet. And Sampson would just think that the recruit had called him on his own accord, which would've been perfectly legal. But here's the problem with that explanation: Unless Sampson's phone works differently from the way every other phone of every other coach I spoke with works -- and my own phone, it's worth noting -- then when Senderoff called Sampson to initiate the three-way call it would've been Senderoff's phone number that showed up on Sampson's caller ID. So if this was all innocent, wouldn't Sampson have been shocked to hear a recruit's voice after seeing Senderoff's phone number in the caller ID? Wouldn't the first question have been, "Hey recruit. Why are you calling me from Rob's phone?"
"That's why his story isn't believable," said one high-major assistant. "We use three-way calls all the time, and what he's describing just isn't the way it works. The way it works is for me to get a recruit on the phone and then patch Coach in, and when Coach answers I say, 'Hey Coach. I've got so-and-so on the line here for you.' That's why it's hard to believe this is all innocent."
To be clear, all the facts aren't out yet. There could be more we don't know, like that Sampson's caller ID was broken or that Senderoff had a call block on his phone that wouldn't show Sampson who was on the other end of line. But barring such unusual circumstances, the explanation doesn't ring true, and that's why Sampson is taking a beating in the business both publicly from the media and privately from his colleagues.
So am I surprised by Wednesday's news?
In a word, no.
As the above blog shows I never believed Sampson was believable.
And the crazy thing is that though the phone calls would not have cost him his job the subsequent lies just might.