Hey Losers: Guess what? I'm starting my own fantasy website and I need cut and paste pros to scour the internet and gather pertinet information to make my site relevant. Send me your creds and I'll have Scouts Stink check you out. I've got them on retainer after my good buddy Pat Bowlen recommended them. Naturally, they gave Josh, thumbs up approval. And, if things don't work out, I'm prepared to take the rap on any H.W.I.(Hiring While Intoxicated) charge. (Two buds clinking beer glasses icon )
Seriously, Carson Palmer sell!!! Are you kidding me? With a late 7th round ADP in a 12 team, you can get a guy whose back in a 4,000 yard groove with a QB friendly schedule and poised to approach the 30 TD milestone. He's an excellent 7th round pick and can be backed up with Hasselback to give your team the luxury of holding off on QB selection and stocking up on RB/WR/TE guys early. I guess in some cases the cut doesn't always match with the paste. Well, we all make mistakes, so I'll overlook this.
I would like to start by saying Matt Schaub could very well be a top 5 or even higher fantasy QB. He has crazy weapons from, stud RB, stud WR, good number 2 WR, and great receiving TE. He is extremely under valued and will be a steal for anyone.
Brady- Agree, @23 you will be garaunteed some great outings. His bad games will still get you more points than most other fantasy QBs. A steal @23.
Warner- Agree, @ 39 there is some real talent at other positions. Warner was a great fantasy QB last year, but his turnovers really made some of his bad games really bad. He will get you some great games as well, but @39 it might be a little high considering all of the factors above. If you like him, I don't think anyone could argue if you took him there, but might not pay off for you.
Romo- Disagree, just for the fact that Rodgers on average is available @43. If you really want a QB, Romo could do just fine, but Romo ahead of Rodgers is definitly too high.
Rodgers- Agree, absolute stud and @49 you could get yourself a potential top 3 fantasy QB in the 5th round. Don't really need to say more.
McNabb- Agree, 63 is a good spot for him. He could potentially be a top 5 fantasy QB, and being in round 6, you should have some studs at different positions.
Ryan- Disagree, @ 73, that would mean he is close to the likes of McNabb, which I do not see quite yet. I think he could get there, but maybe to high of expectations for him, they run a lot.
Palmer- Disagree, @93 he would be a steal. He should/could easily outplay Ryan, and at 20 picks later, you are getting great value. He was once a top 5 fantasy QB and could get close if he can stay healthy.
E Manning- Agree, outside of 100 if where he should go, but he isn't a great fantasy player, they run a lot and he will not get you consistent numbers.
Hasselbeck- Agree, outside of the top 100 would be a steal, considering his potential. He has always been underated as a fantasy QB, and now he has a true number 1, solid 2 and 3 and a good TE.
Edwards- Agree, late in the draft, this guy could put up number 1 fantasy QB kind of numbers. He has weapons and could be fairly consistent, just maybe not those blow up games for 40 points.
The downside to Carson is he has to play Pittsburgh and Baltimore twice thats 4 games against two of the toughest defenses around even for a quarterback with no rust it would be tough, and with the loss of T.J. and no dominant running game he might be nice to stash in a keeper league in case of injury to your starter or back up. but I would wait till he has a healthy season under his belt before I get excited.
Peyton has to be on here, he should still be a top fantasy qb and a steal in later rounds if he goes after Brees, Warner, and Brady. Palmer does have 4 tough games each year, but he can still play at an elite level this season if he stays healthy. If you guys enjoy talking about fantasy football, sign up for myfantasyplayers.com today.
