I hear alot people are saying that the Packers losing Al Harris and Aaron Kampman for the rest of the season is going to be a huge loss, but it is really a blessing in disguise. You mean losing a guy who cannot cover any WR in the NFL and always gets all for the most ridiculous penalties is a huge loss? Al Harris is one of the oldest, if not the oldest player on that defense and yet he is the most immature. He just cannot control himself, he absolutely needs to showboat when he makes a play, no matter how basic it may be he has to showboat. Tremon Williams is just as good if not better than Al Harris, except the only thing is he tends to bat balls down instead of picking them off, but thats a hell of alot better than Al Harris who will either get called for a penalty or give up the huge play at the wrong time. Don't get me wrong, Al Harris USED to be a good CB and one of the best, but now he is just garbage.
Aaron Kampman isn't a big loss because he isn't a natural born linebacker, he is a DE and always will be. He cannot cover anyone he guards and his backup Brad Jones is a very nice replacement. I believe he ran the 40 in 4.2 seconds which means he can get to the QB faster than Aaron Kampman, and he can cover receivers better. The most important thing is that he was always a LB, unlike Aaron Kampman who is trying to become a LB.
I know there are a lot of brainwashed Packer fans who are going to try and back up Al Harris and Aaron Kampman but the fact is that they are not that good. Kampman doesn't play the position he dominates and Al Harris is too old and washed up, we will be fine without them.
Al Harris isn't too much of a problem. Losing a good safety would be tougher. Nick Collins or Atari Bigby would hurt worse. Tramon Williams shows promise and if he is going to replace Harris anyway why not throw him into the fire. Aaorn Kampman is a little more of a loss. Switching to the 3-4 was tough for him but Brad Jones is only a rookie and there will be some fall off there. I still think they'll be okay.
tok first of all you cant call williams a good cb cause he doesnt start against premier recievers so hes a unknown.... but something i can promise you is hes a young cb so blown coverage on miscues will be coming in the next few weeks... always does with young cbs no matter there skill....
Aaron Kampman is a big loss cause hes a leader on the dfense... hes been starting to play better in the 3-4 and i dont know where your getting your numbers but im pretty sure that Brad Jones didnt run a 4.2.... sorry buddy... stop sh!tting out numbers cause it makes u look stupid.. here i will look it up for ya........ok so says he runs a 4.54... which is on the fast side for a linebacker but your losing kampans presence.. theres a reason why hes the starter and to not think losing 2 defensive startsers will change things drastically..
well your a idiot.. thats like me saying the Vikings losing mckinnie on the line cause he gets blown by sometimes or hes a fat ass or he causes penalties... hes a probowl player... fact said... losing Al Harris isnt to big of a loss but kampan will hurt...
just interetsted tho... where did u get that sh!t head running a 4.2 from... ..??????????? ismokeweedtomuch.com???????????
Aaron Kampman is a big loss cause hes a leader on the dfense... hes been starting to play better in the 3-4 and i dont know where your getting your numbers but im pretty sure that Brad Jones didnt run a 4.2.... sorry buddy... stop sh!tting out numbers cause it makes u look stupid.. here i will look it up for ya........ok so says he runs a 4.54... which is on the fast side for a linebacker but your losing kampans presence.. theres a reason why hes the starter and to not think losing 2 defensive startsers will change things drastically..
Aaron Kampman isn't the team leader, that would belong to Charles Woodson and Nick Barnett. Actually Kampman has been way worse in the 3-4 defense because he's not a LB, he's a DE and the Packers potentially ruined his career. I said I BELIEVE he did, I didn't know for sure but that is very fast for a LB. Aaron Kampman being out for the Cowboys game really didn't matter and it won't for the rest of the season. Brad Jones will be able to cover better, and he will be able to get to the QB faster than Kampman would.
Al Harris is the most overrated CB in the NFL, and that's not a joke. He sucks, and this isn't the same thing, game after game he gets called for penalties and burned deep for TD's, he just sucks now, plain and simple he's not what he used to be.
Al Harris isn't too much of a problem. Losing a good safety would be tougher. Nick Collins or Atari Bigby would hurt worse. Tramon Williams shows promise and if he is going to replace Harris anyway why not throw him into the fire. Aaorn Kampman is a little more of a loss. Switching to the 3-4 was tough for him but Brad Jones is only a rookie and there will be some fall off there. I still think they'll be okay.
Aaron Kampman is a rookie at the LB position and hasn't been doing a good job. Read my other post on why Brad Jones is a good replacement and a better LB than Kampman.
Oh and Vikings3060, Frank Who? By your predictions the Packers only have 1 more game to win this season, no backin out now buddy boy. You have been wrong on the last 2 predictions, care to try again?
oh my... 2 predictions wrong.. oh no.. you have had many wrong so please dont talk... almost every thing u say thats going to happen doesnt..... and i said the Packers will win 6-8 games and i said i will take the average for 7...... u said there winning 10-11....so please... dont talk... we both know you rteam is trash....
oh my... 2 predictions wrong.. oh no.. you have had many wrong so please dont talk... almost every thing u say thats going to happen doesnt..... and i said the Packers will win 6-8 games and i said i will take the average for 7...... u said there winning 10-11....so please... dont talk... we both know you rteam is trash....
Lol what have I gotten wrong besides the Vikings and Bucs (which everyone had Bucs losing)? And please tell me what I have said that doesn't happen? No, you said they will be exactly 7-9 and you have said it in multiple threads. I said they were going to be over .500, which is atleast 9 wins. Without a fluke loss to the Bucs we are 7-3. My team is trash, is that right? Must be why you needed our teams QB to be good and once he is gone you're team will be a complete mess (8-8 at best).
Vikings made playoffs easy without favre and 3 qb carrousel.. you also said the Eagles were beating the cowboysl.. you said favre would collapse... ythe bucs won so theres no excuses... in fact.. the the fact that the pack lost to the bucs is just downright funny...... there so bad.... and in multiple threads i said 6-8 wins and i was going witht he middle..... and no u said they were making playoffs with 10-11 wins and were going to beat the vikes in the playoffs
2 possible pro bowlers not big losses?? I voted for both of them on the ballot to go to the pro bowl. Judging by your defense the last few weeks they give up like 20 a game. I think you might be in over your head.
o i dunno which is funnier.. him not thinking that losing both those players will affect the defense.. or the fact that he thought the olb could run a 4.2... that shows he knows nothing about football and hasnt ever played it... no linebacker in the nfl has ever run a 4.2... thats insane speed... thats faster than Chris Johnson....... your a fool dude... that bugs the sh!t out of me that you would try and act like you know what yur talking about... u claim ur source was wrong... for you to "read that" and have nothing click in ur head that says a olb cant run that fast.. means one of two things... you made it up.. like u do most things... or u actually believed it... which would make u a dumbass of football
Vikings made playoffs easy without favre and 3 qb carrousel.. you also said the Eagles were beating the cowboysl.. you said favre would collapse... ythe bucs won so theres no excuses... in fact.. the the fact that the pack lost to the bucs is just downright funny...... there so bad.... and in multiple threads i said 6-8 wins and i was going witht he middle..... and no u said they were making playoffs with 10-11 wins and were going to beat the vikes in the playoffs
They got lucky in the first season and that was when AP was better than he is now. Oh man, one game! I never said Favre would collapse and upsets happen. Oakland beat Cincy and Philly, Chiefs beat Pittsburgh, Rams hung with the Saints in a very close game. I said they could sneak in a wildcard, and the possibility of the Packers beating the Vikings still remains the same.
2 possible pro bowlers not big losses?? I voted for both of them on the ballot to go to the pro bowl. Judging by your defense the last few weeks they give up like 20 a game. I think you might be in over your head.
Actually they gave up 7 to the Cowboys without Kampman and 24 to the Niners, the defense got over their heads in that game because they held em to 3 points at half but we still won. You voted for Aaron Kampman to go to the probowl as a linebacker? You sure know alot about football. And Al Harris in the same sentence as probowl is absolutely ridiculous.
4.2 is faster then a 4.24 what johnson ran at the combine.. so please tell me again to cut my wrists.. you inbred.. u know nothing about footabll. boy... i run a 4.45 by the way.. get out
i just thought id add that to the wound that i keep dumping salt on.. please tell me your source of where you had a outside linebacker running a 4.2........ im waiting????? where did u read this... your ass?
It doesn't even matter, Brad Jones is fast as hell and it will benefit the Packers having him in there rather than Aaron Kampman. I don't care about the times people run at the combine, I care about their football skills and how they play which is all that matters.
