Honestly, the concept of Denard in the NFL is a long-shot in my opinion. If Denard stands a chance to get drafted as a punt returner, he had better play very well and win against Alabama, MSU, Ohio, and Nebraska. I predict that Denard is left sitting around until the 5th round and all UofM haters will laugh at our "star starting QB".I will only state this.....Denard Robinson will play in the NFL. He will never be a QB, but he will definetely play atleast 3 years in the NFL....High Character kids with the speed and talent he has will be a plus to any team. I will go on to further state that he will last longer in the NFL then most 1st round picks that feel entitled.... DR can be on my team any day of the week simply based on his leadership skills.....Heck at the very least he would be a ST captain.....He will be more though.....
I'm fine with him at QB but starting Gardner and putting Denard on the field in other ways isn't a bad idea.Agreed, but I'm still banking on Gardner getting his exta year after DR is gone....Hoke is a smart guy....He will use Gardner for the next two years and Morris will come in ready to take the reigns......I hope he red shirts, but doubt that will happen with only Bellomny as a true back up.....
Kiper's assessment is risky at best. It is based solely on his potential as an athlete. Most of the guys that change from QB to WR going into the NFL fail. It seldom works. Randle El is one of the rare exceptions. Brad Smith has been a modest success, I suppose.Kipers assessment was realistic to what NFL teams are looking for. Its blatently obvious that Denard does not have the skillset to play QB in the NFL. However he does have worldclass speed and ankle breaking cutting ability which is not only at the NFL level but at the high end IMO. So Denard has zero chance of being drafted as a QB so realistically he will be drafted (as an athlete like you said) which puts him at receiver/returner. If he can't catch or route run then that leaves returner..if he can't do that he won't be playing obviously. I think his natural abilities will make him a prolific return man in he NFL.
I have no doubt that he'll be drafted at WR or DB or something like that. It's his assessment that he'll be 1st or 2nd WR on the board that I find ridiculous. I admire Denard as a person, and respect his raw athletic ability. But anyone who puts him as their 1st or 2nd WR on the board is being downright stupid. You don't rate someone that high without knowing from what you have seen that they have at least the basic skills to play the position. No one will have any idea whether he can actually catch the football with a defender on him or coming at him, or whether he can run routes and make the appropriate route adjustments during the play.
As far as Boldin and Jones ...
Boldin - he played QB in his last season just slightly more than how often Denard lined up at WR last year. I rememberr that last season quite well, because Boldin really caught my eye that season at Florida State. He caught my eye primarily as a pass receiver. Since Boldin was primarily a WR, scouts had plenty of opportunity to see him running routes and catching the ball.
Jones - PLEASE ... ARE YOU SERIOUS? He's the classic example of why you don't draft a QB as a WR that high in the draft. He was brutal, even before we found out about the coke.
We don't know how Denard will do as a WR. Nobody does. He might be Randle El. He might be plenty of guys who made the switch and failed. If you think about it, did Randle El or Smith really become 1st round type receivers in the NFL? Not really. Nice guys to have on your team. But they are primarily just depth guys that work well as a 3rd WR. Neither came anywhere close to being a star in the NFL.
Should someone draft Denard based on his potential? Absolutely. Should they draft him anywhere near the top of the draft? Absolutely not.
Jones - PLEASE ... ARE YOU SERIOUS? He's the classic example of why you don't draft a QB as a WR that high in the draft. He was brutal, even before we found out about the coke.
I think the idea of having a 3rd string emergency QB who could also return kicks and line up on O could be quite intriguing for any GM looking for value. His skillset is raw, but he's got enough versatility for someone to take a mid to late round flyer on him. Kiper having him as one of the top receiving prospects seems like more of a statement about the receiving prospects than denard.Hail, I think having DR line up at QB in the NFL and calling it an emergency is underscoring the point. It is doubtful he would even be given that playbook. Speculating where he goes in the 2013 draft is fruitless until we know how he performs his senior year. If it is similar to this year, I would guess you are correct with estimating a 4-5th round pick. If he shows receiver/returner capabilities that could easily get bumped up to the 2nd round, even 1st if he performs well. The issue is that Michigan is unlikely to utilize him as a returner because of the chance of injury. The team doesn't have enough talent at the skill positions to take that risk.
So much for shelving Michigan football til the fall.sorry, my therapist quarantined me to the basement until NSD
you are quickly becoming this boards new KJi do so miss him. Perhaps I should borrow your skirt and try out for the cheerleading squad?
He's an elite talent with the football in his hands.Correction, he an elite college football talent with the football in his hands as long as he isn't throwing the ball. I really do like DR and think he could win a Heisman if used correctly. Tell me, what position should a lightning quick athlete play that can go from zero to gone in half a second? If you answered returner/receiver give yourself that oreo you have been eyeing.
You're quickly becomeing a joke and awfully transparent.I'm starting to cry (bee gees reference). Transparent? While I admire your narrow-minded focus, I think it might be time for you to branch out and embrace your north side brethren.