The Wings have been rumored to be in the market for a top 6 forward. It makes sense as long as it's not a rental but 1. Ruutu is a UFA this summer and would most likely be a rental, and 2. I don't like Ruutu
Obviously landing Zach Parise or Bobby Ryan would be amazing pickups but they're probably pipe dreams. Alexander Semin is out there as well but he needs to learn how to play defense before he can play in Detroit. I don't like lazy players.
No offense, Tuomo - you have a sensationally silly name, and for that, I will always have a soft spot in my heart for you - but I'd sincerely hope that if Holland thinks the Red Wings need to pick up a center that sucks at faceoffs, his name would be Malkin, not Ruutu.
I think a good place for Tuomo Ruutu would be with the Wild. With the uncertainty of Bouchard and Latendresse, it makes sense to me.
How is Gleason really an upgrade over anything the Leafs have?that depends greatly on if you're looking at right now, or the future, and if you're judging offensively, defensively, or overall.
right now, i'll take gleason over franson, aulie, and gunnarsson. these guys might develop in to better players, but right now they just aren't
.
I don't think Gunnarsson should be mentioned here. In my opinion he is one of the most underated players on the Leafs. For example, in the last 23 games for the Leafs, he ranks 2nd in average ice time by Leaf defensemen. (I admit Jake Garnier was close to being second, however his extra ice time came because Lilies only played in the last 11 of the 23 sample. Also, Lilies ice time was affected by him being weaned off his injury or else he could have easily been second.) Gunnarsson has averaged 22.4 mins for hast 23 games to be exact.
Gunnarsson is definitely the better player for the future. As for the better now player between Gunnarsson and Gleason. If you need a defensive defensemen, more towards the physical side, then Gleason is the now player. Gunnarsson best defensive skills are more to do with smarts than physical. I like Gunnarssons offensive skills better than Gleason, not a lot better right now, but better and with a up side. I personally think Gunnarsson's best game is better than Gleason's best game, but I admit on average, I would give a slight edge to Gleason because he is more consistent. At the very least I don't think Gleason is way better than Gunnarsson right now.