Forget about Lakers fans being Lebron haters for a second, tell me what is wrong with someone wanting their player to let the team know they wont come back like Melo, Howard and Paul did, rather having their player not say anything like Lebron did and have their team to take a major gambleForget about Lakers fans being Lebron haters for a second, tell me what is wrong with someone wanting their player to let the team know they wont come back like Melo, Howard and Paul did, rather having their player not say anything like Lebron did and have their team to take a major gambleColor me silly but I'd actually prefer that my star player plays 100%, gives maximum effort for the duration of his contract and then he's free to go when he wants.
Lebron not knowing he was going to Miami is right up there in NBA methology with David Sterns not knowing that the Hornets had confirmed the Chris Paul to the Lakers deal. But I guess when we live in a world where communication seems to be at its most primitive level, I can how one can believe that information doesn't pass hands easily.Possibly but, even still, then that's on Dan Gilbert to make the move. It's not LeBron James' responsibility to quit on his team. It's the ownerships responsibility to quit on the player. Again, you all say you like it a certain way now, but had LeBron James quit on Cleveland in the middle of that season and stated he wanted to go elsewhere, the outrage would have been insane. Kobe Bryant let the Lakers know that he wanted out. Aren't you excited they didn't go through with it? You should be. Management makes their own decisions and good management prevails regardless. Cleveland sucking is not LeBron's fault but Cleveland's fault and there's no other argument to it.
It's really nice that it all worked out well for Sterns with that CP3 to the Clippers. Luckily the Clippers were able to land Billups at the last minute with their "secret" bid that landed them Billups. We all know how wanting the Clippers were at the point guard position with Randy Foye, Eric Bledsoe and Mo Williams, the guy they gave up Baron Davis and their number one draft pick for which landed Cleveland Kyrie Irving. Everything tied up in a nice little bow.
Lebron did not claim he only wanted Miami, he claimed there was a real list of team which came courting. Those would have been the teams Cleveland would have negotiated with if, you in fact, believe Lebron was telling the truth about his options.
If he were completely lying and told the truth that he wanted to only go to Miami, you either trade with Miami or you look for a team that wanted him as a rental, like almost any team that was in the playoff run that Lebron could have lifted to elite status.You yourself said that Miami didn't have any players to trade to Cleveland, so you're telling me that the Cavs should have traded him in the middle of a championship run? So what would they have gotten in return? Maybe a lot of draft picks and cash like they did at the end of the season? Gilbert isn't stupid enough to do that in the middle of the season, more than likely end up one and done in the playoffs (if they made it all), while losing LOTS of money by not making a deep playoff run with HCA.
And don't put to much stock in the draft picks received in sign and trade deals. The Cavs got two first round pick from Miami starting this year up until 2017. There isn't a lot top talent at the bottom of the first round. I think 2017 is when Lebron should be winning his, not 4, not 5, but 6th championship. Where did Cleveland get the Kevin Irving pick? That was from the Clippers in the Mo Williams deal. Before this year, the Clippers were the type of team where you got valuable draft picks.The more draft picks the better and there's no way of spinning that into a bad thing.
When Lebron was a free agent, Griffin had yet to play a professional game, but was still a number one draft pick. Lebron or the number one draft pick who had yet to play? Yes, I think the answer would have been easy.
Yes, exactly. But that didn't stop Chris Paul from stating he wanted to go to the Knicks when the Knicks had nothing to trade. But it let New Orleans know he wanted out. Just as Howard has mentioned ciites like Dallas, who have nothing to trade, or the Knicks, who have no one to trade (unless they toss Amare). But the fact is, they are not pretending one of their destinations was and is their current city.
Ugh. The lebron argument again...all I got to say is still no title.Which has nothing to do with this conversation.
OK, fine. Lebron had every right to be a selfish, egotistical, self promoting jerk that screwed an entire organization and an entire city. Still doesn't change the fact that he's a selfish, egotistical, self promoting jerk that screwed an entire organization and an entire city. I personally don't see a title in his future. He's one of the top all time regular season players and that's it.Still has nothing to do with the thread.
Color me silly but I'd actually prefer that my star player plays 100%, gives maximum effort for the duration of his contract and then he's free to go when he wants.Me and you both.
But that's just me.
Just like lebron had nothing to do with the thread...What are you talking about? This thread is about whether LeBron James leaving Cleveland as a free agent or Carmelo Anthony/Dwight Howard demanding trades is a better situation for leaving your team. You're talking about LeBron in a fourth quarter or something.