The Pac-12 Thread....

Views:      
 
 
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 9, 2013 6:44 am

One things for sure, Riley can't teach speed and this kid's a burner!
Riley can't coach offensive linemen to block either.  If you had to take a drink everytime a Texas lineman sacked one of those stiff OSUck quarterbacks you would be hammered!


Orygun Quacks
SinceAug 22, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 9, 2013 12:23 pm

f you had to take a drink everytime a Texas lineman sacked one of those stiff OSUck quarterbacks you would be hammered!
Apparrantly it was you that was drinking to much during the Alamo and had passed out early. You must have missed the fact that most of those 4th quarter sacks on Vaz were at 1 DE guy's hand. It was troubling to watch Lanendorks lack of helping OSU's tackle out in pass protection on that side. Easy for a Smuck to come up with a drinking game analysis of the game tho. Perhaps you were seeing double by the time the game ended Quacker. Is that you behind Puddles in your avi giving that mascot an enima?
mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 9, 2013 7:11 pm

most of those 4th quarter sacks on Vaz were at 1 DE guy's hand
Well that is even worse.  The entire OSU coaching staff can't adjust to block one guy?  Seriously?  Does OSU even know how to make an adjustment?  You know it is legal to have TWO offensive linemen block one guy.  

  
Orygun Quacks
SinceAug 22, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 9, 2013 10:29 pm

This was a few days ago, but when Ted Miller was asked who will win the Pac12 coach of the year for next season he responded Steve Sarkisian. There were many other things he said, but that comment was the only thing users posted about. Not sure if Ted really thinks that or just pulled a name out of his arse, but it made quite a stir for about half a day. 

http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/
_/id/53528/pac-12-chat-wrap-72 
WizardHawk
SinceSep 25, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 9, 2013 10:36 pm

Can't be any worse than some dumb UNDERCOACHED Smuck player out-running his own player WITH THE BALL on the way to the endzone instead of blocking and completing a perfect season and a date with Bama in a Natty game Quacker. I guess all those assistant coaches @UofSmucks don't now how to teach the TOTAL game of football to their players either. Otherwise ya just might have a Natty or two instead of just BCS average wins. Nobody remembers those games in 2 years anywho.

Seriously? 


Put your BIGBOY pants on and clean out your own back yard before finding blame on another team.
mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 1:14 am

It's pretty common for a Duck to correct a rodent so here goes -- UO would have played ND. So ya one brain fart kept UO from winning a natty. You will never see OS that close in your entire lifetime.
Observation 101
SinceOct 16, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 2:56 am

Can't be any worse
Oh I see what you did there.  You tried to shift the focus from a huge, typical failure by the Beavers to somehow trash the Ducks.  Nice try loser.  You want to pick apart Oregon's one loss instead of debate the massive 'coaching failure' of you own team.  Fail.


Oregon State will always be the little brother that couldn't.  Oregon is competing for national titles while Sheep State is losing to teams from Sacramento, CA....ba ha ha ha.   Flame on if that makes you feel better.  meh. 


  
Orygun Quacks
SinceAug 22, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 3:21 am

Oregon over OSU five in a row!

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QeitUNe6SE]
Orygun Quacks
SinceAug 22, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 12:32 pm

You will never see OS that close in your entire lifetime.
One things for sure, I will never see Oregon win a Natty champ either. Teams just not good enuff to climb over the mountain.

Beavers have a better shot at a Natty win before the Smucks in my lifetime, so whats that tell you about the Smucks chances with all Phill's dough?
mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 12:37 pm

from a huge, typical failure by the Beavers
Yeah 9 wins last year from 3 wins the year before somehow translates from your 2 cell brain to mean failure. I aint buying the koolaide your drinking from Smuck. As for 5 wins in a row, a Beav lost is bound to come your way soon. Enjoy your "we almost won again, but came in 2nd" ride. Pac12 teams are catching up to you and lil' Chipper has gotten off the bus ride for a better gig.

HA!
mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 1:42 pm

So ya one brain fart kept UO from winning a natty
Apparrantly from your narrow 1 brain fart observation of the Smucks game, ya forgot to include the fact that they have no kicking game and must go for 4th and whatever all the time. How did that work out for ya?

Alot more brainfarts than you wish to include in yout quest for those elusive Nats. How many more game will be lost with no kicking game till your new coach realizes that there is more to the game of football than just 4th down conversion ratios?
mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 6:24 pm

Beavers have a better shot at a Natty
ba ha ha hah aha....this statement tells me your just a Beaver homer with no credible college football knowledge.  Oregon has been ranked in the top 5 in the country for 3 years in a row.  The team is stacked next season.

There are two things at Beaver nation that you won't see in your lifetime...a football natty and a return trip to the NCAA tournament in hoops.  Beaver basketball has sucked since 1990 and the football team will once again return to it's losing ways.  It's what the Beavs do best!   

  
Orygun Quacks
SinceAug 22, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 10, 2013 7:19 pm

UO has been a whisker away twice and throw in 2001 three times -- OS struggles to win 7 games in back to back years -- who you kidding.
Observation 101
SinceOct 16, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 11, 2013 12:16 am

Oregon State will always be the little brother that couldn't.  Oregon is competing for national titles while Sheep State is losing to teams from Sacramento, CA....ba ha ha ha.   Flame on if that makes you feel better.  meh. 
Oregon is the Little brother that cant until you bring home a NC. That is why USC is superior to Oregon. Yeah you may be on top right now but what do you have to show for it. Be careful about the stats you try to throw because it may backfire.
USC Fight On
SinceDec 5, 2011
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 11, 2013 12:34 am

Oregon is the Little brother
Sorry SC dude, this is a conversation between Oregon/OSU....not you.  So if you don't mind, STFU and don't interrupt.


  
Orygun Quacks
SinceAug 22, 2006
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 11, 2013 2:25 pm

Beaver basketball has sucked since 1990 and the football team will once again return to it's losing ways.  It's what the Beavs do best! 
Wouldn't be talking about BB either Smucks, yer fre-falling down those rankings too. as far a returning to football losing ways again, just another chep shot with no meat. Safe to say the Beavs will pull a few feathers of your teams azz soon. Clost to a Natty? What a statement that is. Guess your happy withh being close rather than actually winning one. Settle back into your easy chair and watch college baseball this season and make another football "wish" samwhich  for next football season. Hope freshman Tyner does good for ya, you'll need it as teams focus on containing Marriotas option reads instead.

BTW...


Throwing Beaver lose stat haymakers @ me doesn't worry me, just shows me have nothing else.

GL in the march madness thing, sure your squad will fade quick as they always do.

mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 11, 2013 4:44 pm

Sorry SC dude, this is a conversation between Oregon/OSU....not you.  So if you don't mind, STFU and don't interrupt.

Translation = "Darnit!! I was picking on my little brother and Dad had to show up and tell me to knock it off!!"Tongue out


trojanfan12
SinceAug 22, 2008
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 11, 2013 5:06 pm

Wallace, you are really out there dude. Oregon should really be called OSU, becuase they do in fact OWN the STATE of OREGON! You should consider it an honor if they even allow you to hold there jock.
drkato
SinceMar 30, 2008
-

The Pac-12 Thread....

February 11, 2013 6:24 pm

becuase they do in fact OWN the STATE of OREGON! You should consider it an honor if they even allow you to hold there jock.
Oh gawd it's darkmeat. Nice to see ya darko! Puttin your Stanford 2 cents in today? That's all your opinions worth these days anywho.

Your wrong about ownership of course. The fact is THE STATE OF OREGON owns both institutions wer talking about. Even tho UO has been trying to privatize their Institution for somw time now. What those Smuck idiots don't get is that they'll have to pay dearly if they ever want privatize, THE STATE OF OREGON owns every building, stick-n-dirtclod, land, football feild and any thing else down there on that 200 acres.

I bleed orange-n-black, so holding a brown stained cotton jock aint in the cards for me, but you can hold em since ya like talking about em.
mrwallace2ku
SinceOct 19, 2012