First, let's recognize that, love him or hate him, Kobe's one of the (but not THE) all-time greats. But just how great?
It's obvious that, barring injury, Kobe's going to continue to climb the all-time scoring ladder. How far will he go? Assuming Kobe retires about the same age Jordan did (and wouldn't that be just like Kobe?) and he averages what Jordan did in his Jordan's last two years (about 1,500 pts/season) and doubles this season's output for the remainder of the season (700 pts), Kobe will score about 9,700 more than his current 28,600 giving him about 38,300 pts for his career. This would put him just about where Kareem is, plus or minus a few. So depending on how Kobe performs at the end of his career, he will be get near to Kareem's all-time mark and could conceivably break it.
As far as field goals are concerned, Kareem's field goal record of 15,837 is safe. Kobe's sitting just under 10,000 now. Even if Kobe averages the same number of FG's as he has for the last 2 years until age 39 (about 725) and doubles his current FG's for the remainder of this season, Kobe's totals would be 14,600, good enough for #2. And that's optimistic. Jordan averaged 615 FG's/year in his last two seasons, so it's likely Kobe would be closer to 14,000, still good enough for #2 but quite a bit off of Kareem's #'s.
Where Kobe's numbers begin to fall flat starts with his FG%, where his career .454 average isn't in the top 250 all-time and a far cry from Jordan's .494 no less John Stockton's .515 (take that Rubio! Best PG since Magic, righhhhhht.) Add that to his high turnover ratio (he'll likely end up w/ 50% more turvovers than Jordan) and it's clear that, though Kobe will probably put up stellar numbers before he's done, his penchant for taking tough shots and tendancy to try and shoot his way out of every slump he's ever been in leaves him behind other all-time greats like Kareem, Russell, Wilt or Jordan.
Still, assuming Kobe keeps his scoring up (and there's no reason to believe he won't given what he's doing this season) there's no doubt he'll end his career near the top of a few all-time lists.
My 1st question is simple: Will Kobe's end-of-career attempt to become the all-time career scoring leader help or hurt his all-time ranking regardless if he is 2nd or 1st in scoring?
My 2nd question is: Will any of Kobe's numbers matter if Lebron is able to extend his career into his late 30's, or will Lebron's numbers tumble once his legs/athleticism begin to recede?
My 1st question is simple: Will Kobe's end-of-career attempt to become the all-time career scoring leader help or hurt his all-time ranking regardless if he is 2nd or 1st in scoring?
My 2nd question is: Will any of Kobe's numbers matter if Lebron is able to extend his career into his late 30's, or will Lebron's numbers tumble once his legs/athleticism begin to recede?
Horns,
Even as a Lakers/Kobe fan you're 100% on the mark. I'd rather see Kobe adjust his game and feed the post earlier in his possessions. In fact, if Kobe would give the ball up earlier he'd get it back more frequently for open shots or cuts to the basket. Kobe scores more by giving the ball up - but it would take an exceptional coach to convince him of that.He would be better served to stop shooting it so much and pass to Bynum.
The Lakers will only win by Bynum being the centerpiece NOT Kobe.
If he beats Jordan's ring totals, that is more impressive than chasing down his scoring number
Trojan,
I think Kobe controls his own destiny on the scoring record, but has only a remote chance of getting another title needing a big assist from a) other players and b) management. My bet is Kobe opts for the scoring, as has been his penchant throughout his career.However, if he decides to chase Kareem, the he will almost assuredly catch and pass him on the all-time scoring list, but will not catch or pass MJ in titles.
The Lakers will only win by Bynum being the centerpiece NOT KobeHorns, sorry as a Lakers fan ... your foundation, or centerpiece, if it's Bynum, not necessarily the most stable so have to respectfully disagree completely. Passing it to Bynum who has no go to shot and heck it urks me when he misses up close shots most of all, might as well pick another center piece and of course dealing with his health as well.
LeBron James is likely to smash it.Cool ... so if that's the case
If he beats Jordan's ring totals, that is more impressive than chasing down his scoring numbers.Assuming that's the rationale ... then LeBron has far more to go than Kobe if that is the true standard. I don't care about the selfish label, it's a great accomplishment in terms of longevity as well and being a effective scorer, Kudos to Kobe but the Lakers still lost the game to the 76ers.
tfitz,
When I started the thread I contemplated whether both Durant and Lebron might grab the top scoring honor, and decided Durant will climb the ladder but not to the top. Certainly Durant has had a stellar start, he's a pure shooter with moves and hops. But time will dull his skills and he'll need to compensate by changing his style over time. Where Lebron has the size to move closer to the rim, Durant will get a beat-down in the low post with his toothpick body type should he attempt to do so. As age diminishes his legs and quickness his scoring will likely take a big hit that cannot be compensated for by developing a low post game.
Centers like Kareem have the advantage over other positions, they can get closer to the basket toward the end. But smaller players like Jordan and Durant have to change their style if they're going to prevail. Whereas Lebron's body type he can survive in the low post, his approach to scoring will keep him from reaching the top, he's just too much of a team player. Kobe's somewhat of an anomaly in that, though his game hasn't changed much, he just keeps shooting no matter how often he misses. Still, he'll need to go low post toward the end if he's going to keep his scoring average up.
One note about the all-time record: Jordan took the better part of four seasons off. Had he played each season, by my estimate Jordan could have scored somewhere around another 8,500 points and would easily have passed Kareem in scoring and, perhaps even in FG's. Jordan was simply an amazing scorer and all-around player. No knock on Russell or Kareem, but I really think Jordan was the best player all-time with his all-around game, ability to score, and history of stepping up when it counted the most. As a Lakers fan I hated him, but as an NBA fan I hold him above all others.
Didn't he come out and say today that he won't be one of those guys that averages 18 pts a game?
That's either a testament to he'll retire when he can no longer score 24-25 a game while still shooting around 45%, or he'll just shoot his team out of games to get to 24-25 pts a game because he's too old to get to the hoop.
Didn't he come out and say today that he won't be one of those guys that averages 18 pts a game?
That's either a testament to he'll retire when he can no longer score 24-25 a game while still shooting around 45%, or he'll just shoot his team out of games to get to 24-25 pts a game because he's too old to get to the hoop.
Him saying that just shows that he is thinking about points and not titles in this point of his career. If he thinks that scoring only 18-19 while maybe getting 5 boards and dimes isn't contributing enough to get to another title, then he's just being selfish by wanting to make sure he hits that 24-25pt game all the time...regardless how many shots it takes.It seems that what he said is being taken out of context a bit (I know, I'm as shocked as anyone to see that on these boards. LOL!!). He also said that he is not going to be one of those guys going from team to team trying to chase rings. That if he gets anymore rings, it will be as a Laker. What that tells me, is that he still wants rings, but isn't going to try to get one by being an 18 ppg player hopping from one contending team to another (you know, like Shaq and others have done).
18-19 a game isn't going to get him to Kareem faster than 24-25.
If Kobe is able to accept being a #2 option, he could be a pretty devastating #2 option.Then, if only the Lakers could find a #1, they'd be set!
Then, if only the Lakers could find a #1, they'd be set!