Likewise, I like this team's chances in the NCAA tourney. The 1-pt. loss to Kentucky will be a good thing if that is the team we eventually have to face.
-----------------------------
I hope you get your wish. I honestly would like to see UNC face Kentucky again. The UK team that beat UNC two months ago was a young team in search of itself. These young men were just barely out of high school. Since that time UK has grown and has lost just one game; a buzzer beater. And, UK’s Jones played the worse game of his life.
Meanwhile UNC has lost three more times: once by 33 points to an unranked team. And, recently they blew a 10 point lead (at home) in the final 2 minutes. This is not what winners do. UK would have been on Duke’s -ss. Duke would have never done this to the present UK team.
You people have a poor conception of Calipari. This should be the third year in a row for him to win the national COY. And, if people were not biased he would do just that. Here’s why.
He took over a program that had just been to the NIT. And, he won 35 games; won both the SEC & regular season titles; sent 5 players to the NBA (first round); and, went to the elite 8.
The following season he won 29 games; the SEC tournament title; and, went to the final 4. He did all this despite losing 5 players to the NBA, and having the NCAA cheat him out of the services of Kanter—and, he was cheated.
This year he regrouped after sending another four players to the NBA. This team is the best defensive team in the nation. They can shoot the three; they can shoot FT’s; and, they have upperclassmen that have been to a final 4. They improve weekly.
Look back to when Cal first came to UK. He plainly said that it would take about three years for him to have UK challenging for the NT every year. This is the third year. Only a fool would want his team to face UK in the title. If UNC does this, I look for Williams to drop to 1 & 4 against Cal instead of the present 1 & 3.
Topcat it's hard to win coach of the year when every year you have the most NBA talent on your team.
-------------------------
Recruiting is one of the most difficult challenges of coaching. And, it might very well be the most important. Why would we not consider this aspect when evaluating a coach’s performance? A coach’s achievement is/should be based on what talent he inherited/ended the season with and what he did from that point to better next year’s production.
What Cal meant by “three years” was having a mix of sophomores, juniors, and seniors; as well as loads of freshmen.
Cal does an excellent job of getting the most out of his young talent. He is excellent at getting these egotistical young men to buy into the team concept. And, more difficult still, he gets them to play defense.
You want an example of this. Then look at the Heels. UNC is made up of 5star players of seniors, juniors, sophomores, and freshmen. UNC is loaded with 5star players, but Williams is having a difficult time defining roles, and in getting his team to play defense. Simply having talent (even upperclassmen) isn't in itself enough to guarantee a win.
Cal is able to do this with freshmen. I mean, h-ll, this blows my mind. I’ve never seen anything like it. He does this with team after team.
I would rather face any team in the tournament other than the Heels. One of these two teams will win the NT—in my opinion. But, if Cal wasn’t able to get his young talent to buy into the team concept (year after year) UK would be a non-factor. Because he is able to do what he does Cal should be winning his third straight COY award.
Really people?? Giving up on the season??
Makes one wonder.........![]()